Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-2832 Heterogeneous Storage Phase 1 to trunk

+1 nice feature for HDFS On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Arpit Agarwal wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > Our plan as stated back in August was to do this work principally in two > phases. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2832?focusedCommentId=13739041 > > For the second phase which includes AP

Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-2832 Heterogeneous Storage Phase 1 to trunk

Hi Andrew, Our plan as stated back in August was to do this work principally in two phases. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-2832?focusedCommentId=13739041 For the second phase which includes API support, we also need quota management. For changes of this scope, to do all the work at on

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-10149) Create ByteBuffer-based cipher API

Owen O'Malley created HADOOP-10149: -- Summary: Create ByteBuffer-based cipher API Key: HADOOP-10149 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10149 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type:

Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-2832 Heterogeneous Storage Phase 1 to trunk

Hi everyone, I'm still getting up to speed on the changes here (my fault for not following development more closely, other priorities etc etc), but the branch thus far is already quite impressive. It's quite an undertaking to turn the DN into a collection of Storages, along with the corresponding

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 0.23.10

+1 (non-binding) Environment: Fedora17, protobuf 2.4.1, JDK 1.7.0_45 -successful built from source -successful native build -deployed source build to my single-node cluster and ran multiple instances of wordcount -verified signature and digests - M!T On 12/3/13, 12:22 AM, "Thomas Graves"

Re: Next releases

Thanks Suresh & Colin. Please update the Roadmap wiki with your proposals. As always, we will try our best to get these in - but we can collectively decide to slip some of these to subsequent releases based on timelines. Arun On Dec 6, 2013, at 10:43 AM, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > Arun, > > I

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 0.23.10

+1 (non-binding) -source successfully build under Fedora 17 -deployed source build to single-node cluster -verified by running some example jobs - file a minor non-blocking bug HADOOP-10148 On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Jason Lowe wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - verified signatures and digests >

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-10148) backport hadoop-10107 to branch-0.23

Chen He created HADOOP-10148: Summary: backport hadoop-10107 to branch-0.23 Key: HADOOP-10148 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10148 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Sub-task

Re: Next releases

If 2.4 is released in January, I think it's very unlikely to include symlinks. There is still a lot of work to be done before they're usable. You can look at the progress on HADOOP-10019. For some of the subtasks, it will require some community discussion before any code can be written. For bet

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-10147) Upgrade to commons-logging 1.1.3 to avoid potential deadlock in MiniDFSCluster

Eric Sirianni created HADOOP-10147: -- Summary: Upgrade to commons-logging 1.1.3 to avoid potential deadlock in MiniDFSCluster Key: HADOOP-10147 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10147

Re: branch development for HADOOP-9639

+1good idea Thanks for contributing Sangjin. On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote: > We have been having discussions on HADOOP-9639 (shared cache for jars) and > the proposed design there for some time now. We are going to start work on > this and have it vetted and reviewed b

Re: branch development for HADOOP-9639

Chris, I'm already on it. Thanks. On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Chris Nauroth wrote: > +1 for the idea. The branch committership clause was added for exactly > this kind of scenario. > > From the phrasing in the bylaws, it looks like we'll need assistance from > PMC to get the ball rolling.

Re: branch development for HADOOP-9639

+1 for the idea. The branch committership clause was added for exactly this kind of scenario. >From the phrasing in the bylaws, it looks like we'll need assistance from PMC to get the ball rolling. Is there a PMC member out there who could volunteer to help start the process with Sangjin? Chris

Jenkins build is back to normal : Hadoop-Common-0.23-Build #814

See