Tsuyoshi OZAWA created HADOOP-11313:
---
Summary: Adding a document about NativeLibraryChecker
Key: HADOOP-11313
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11313
Project: Hadoop Common
Suresh, Tsz-Wo,
Thanks for your comments.
Could you check a comment by Masatake on HDFS-6833?
thanks,
- Tsuyoshi
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 7:14 AM, Tsz Wo Sze wrote:
> I agree that HDFS-6833 is not a blocker. It is not a problem for the blocks
> with replication >= 3 and it is not a regression
+1 (suppose using md5 is intentional.)
Verified md5 and ran a single node HA HDFS cluster for some time. Everything
worked great.
Regards,Tsz-Wo
On Monday, November 17, 2014 4:48 PM, Tsz Wo Sze
wrote:
Hi Arun,
Only md5 is provided but not mds? Is it intentional?
Tsz-Wo
On
Sorry, my vote should be non-binding.
Regards,
Yi Liu
-Original Message-
From: Liu, Yi A [mailto:yi.a@intel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2014 10:03 AM
To: hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org; common-dev@hadoop.apache.org;
yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org
Subje
+1 (binding)
- Built from source
- Setup a security cluster with 4 nodes, and verified various fs operations.
- Verified MapReduce examples in security mode.
- Verify HDFS encryption at rest in security mode.
Regards,
Yi Liu
-Original Message-
From: Arun C Murthy [mailto:a...@hortonworks
Andrew Wang created HADOOP-11312:
Summary: Fix TestKMS to not use uppercase key names
Key: HADOOP-11312
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11312
Project: Hadoop Common
Issue Ty
Hi Arun,
Only md5 is provided but not mds? Is it intentional?
Tsz-Wo
On Monday, November 17, 2014 2:14 PM, Tsz Wo Sze
wrote:
I agree that HDFS-6833 is not a blocker. It is not a problem for the blocks
with replication >= 3 and it is not a regression (please correct me if I am
w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kannan Rajah resolved HADOOP-11310.
---
Resolution: Implemented
> Load AuthenticationFilter config params from core-site.xml
> -
I agree that HDFS-6833 is not a blocker. It is not a problem for the blocks
with replication >= 3 and it is not a regression (please correct me if I am
wrong.)Tsz-Wo
On Monday, November 17, 2014 10:06 AM, Suresh Srinivas
wrote:
Tsuyoshi, thanks for bringing up HDFS-6833. However
+1 (binding)
Verified the signatures and hashes for both src and binary tars. Built from
the source, the binary distribution and the documentation. Started a single
node cluster and tested the following:
- Started HDFS cluster, verified the hdfs CLI commands such ls, copying
data back and forth, v
+1 (non-binding)
- Deployed single node cluster
- Verified reservation system works (YARN-1051) by making reservations and
submitting sample MR jobs against the reservations
- Verified move apps between capacity scheduler queues (YARN-2378)
Thanks,
Subru
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Charles
Hi Suresh,
I did review HDFS-6833 and the patch Shinichi provided a while back. It's
not really directly related to replication factor. The problem reported
there is, DirectoryScanner tries to register with NN blocks already
scheduled to be deleted as regular blocks, due to the delay in block
remo
Andrew Wang created HADOOP-11311:
Summary: Restrict uppercase key names from being created with JCEKS
Key: HADOOP-11311
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11311
Project: Hadoop Common
Kannan Rajah created HADOOP-11310:
-
Summary: Load AuthenticationFilter config params from core-site.xml
Key: HADOOP-11310
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11310
Project: Hadoop Common
Tsuyoshi, thanks for bringing up HDFS-6833. However, given it is a boundary
condition (and should not cause issues when for files with replication
factor 3), we should perhaps target this into 2.6.1 and not block this
release. Thoughts?
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA
wrote:
> +0
I built from the src package, started a cluster, created an encryption
zone and read/wrote data from/to it.
+1 (non-binding)
Charles
+1 (binding)
- verified signatures and digests- verified late-arriving fixes for YARN-2846
and MAPREDUCE-6156 were present
- built from source- deployed to a single-node cluster
- ran some sample MapReduce jobs
Jason
From: Arun C Murthy
To: "common-dev@hadoop.apache.org" ;
"hdfs-...@hado
+1 (non-binding)
+ download and compile source code
+ deployed on a pseudo cluster
+ successfully run sample MR jobs
+ verified checksum
Thanks,Mit Desai
On Monday, November 17, 2014 6:19 AM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA
wrote:
+0(non-binding)
HDFS-6833 is critical issue for us - could you help
+0(non-binding)
HDFS-6833 is critical issue for us - could you help us to merge it into 2.6?
Thanks,
- Tsuyoshi
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Hitesh Shah wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Built Hadoop from source, compiled Tez against the hadoop jars pushed to
> staging repo and ran a few example T
19 matches
Mail list logo
