If you happen to know which committers tend to do a lot of code reviews in
the specific area of the code covered by your patch, then tagging them in
a jira comment is an effective approach. If you're unsure who to contact,
then please feel free to email the appropriate project-specific *-dev list
1. I really like the new patch process, especially the at-a-glance summary
2. I think being -1 on whitespace is overkill; Its just part of my git apply
-p 0 -3 --verbose --whitespace=fix action. Accordingly, I won't reject
patches on whitespace alone.
3. if checkstyle is complaining, how to
As we talked before [1], I am going to start the push for 2.7.1 [2].
Here are the things I am going to do, with help from others in the community
- Review current 2.7.1 content to make sure only bug fixes went in
- Review 2.8 to see if any important bug fixes didn't get merged into 2.7.1
-
About (3.) , a lot of the check style rules seem to be arcane/unnecessary.
Please see : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11869
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com
wrote:
1. I really like the new patch process, especially the at-a-glance summary
Steve Loughran created HADOOP-11874:
---
Summary: s3a can throw spurious IOEs on close()
Key: HADOOP-11874
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11874
Project: Hadoop Common
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steve Loughran resolved HADOOP-11851.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.7.1
s3n to swallow IOEs on inner stream
Varun Vasudev created HADOOP-11872:
--
Summary: hadoop dfs command prints message about using yarn
jar on Windows(branch-2 only)
Key: HADOOP-11872
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11872
Hi Tsuyoshi
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa oz...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Darrell,
Thank you for having interest for contributions to Hadoop project!
* How do I know if a newbie Jira is even still valid?
Please ping committers whether the issue is valid when the issue looks
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-common-trunk-Java8/174/changes
On Apr 22, 2015, at 11:34 PM, Zheng, Kai kai.zh...@intel.com wrote:
Hi Allen,
This sounds great.
Naming a patch foo-HDFS-7285.00.patch should get tested on the HDFS-7285
branch.
Does it happen locally in developer's machine when running test-patch.sh, or
also mean something in
Overall approach and summary is very good... well done
Apart from steve pointed which I had also noticed, following one also i had
seen where I did not seen any clue..
The patch artifact directory on has been removed!
This is a fatal error for test-patch.sh. Aborting.
Jenkins (node H8)
11 matches
Mail list logo