Re: Release numbering for 3.x leading up to GA

Thanks Andrew. I also had a talk with Kai offline. Agreed that we should try our best to finalize coder config changes for alpha1. On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:34 PM Andrew Wang wrote: > The sooner the better for incompatible changes, but at this point we are > explicitly not guaranteeing any compa

Build failed in Jenkins: Hadoop-common-trunk-Java8 #1515

See Changes: [cnauroth] HADOOP-13183. S3A proxy tests fail after httpclient/httpcore upgrade. -- [...truncated 5338 lines...] Tests run: 90, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time ela

RE: [Release thread] 2.8.0 release activities

There are few test cases regularly failing in YARN because of HADOOP-12687(issue with DNS). This issue is blocker for releases since YARN test cases do not guarantee quality. There are some patches ready for this issue. But we doubt will this violate RFC-1535? I would like to hear opinion fr

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-13185) Multiple Instances of KMS Behind a Load-Balancer or VIP AuthenticationException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13185?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Wei-Chiu Chuang resolved HADOOP-13185. -- Resolution: Duplicate Hello [~lushuai] thanks for reporting the issue. This looks ve

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-13185) Multiple Instances of KMS Behind a Load-Balancer or VIP AuthenticationException

lushuai created HADOOP-13185: Summary: Multiple Instances of KMS Behind a Load-Balancer or VIP AuthenticationException Key: HADOOP-13185 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13185 Project:

Build failed in Jenkins: Hadoop-common-trunk-Java8 #1514

See Changes: [jianhe] MAPREDUCE-6696. Add a configuration to limit the number of map tasks -- [...truncated 5316 lines...] Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed

Re: [DISCUSS] Release blocker HADOOP-12893 (LICENSE and NOTICE files)

> The problem I described influences not only binary tar ball, but also > binaries which is deployed on maven. We need to check them. I checked GPL sentences to check whether we need eliminate LGPL files: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#GPLCompatInstaller Quoting from the sentence: >

Re: [DISCUSS] Release blocker HADOOP-12893 (LICENSE and NOTICE files)

Andrew has been working on the next patch recently, but he's on PTO since today until next Mon. We still have some license merging work to do, I'll handle it. I think we can have an update on Monday or Tuesday. So far looks like the deps using LGPL are all dual-licensed, so we don't have legal iss

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-13184) Add "Apache" to Hadoop project logo

Chris Douglas created HADOOP-13184: -- Summary: Add "Apache" to Hadoop project logo Key: HADOOP-13184 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13184 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type:

Re: [DISCUSS] Release blocker HADOOP-12893 (LICENSE and NOTICE files)

Can you please summarize on how much effort is still left with HADOOP-12893? Like the starting email mentioned, for all purposes, all Hadoop releases are blocked on this decision - even though they are ready otherwise (for e.g. 2.7.3). +Vinod > On May 19, 2016, at 1:34 AM, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrot

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-13183) S3A proxy tests fail after httpclient/httpcore upgrade.

Chris Nauroth created HADOOP-13183: -- Summary: S3A proxy tests fail after httpclient/httpcore upgrade. Key: HADOOP-13183 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13183 Project: Hadoop Common

Re: ASF OS X Build Infrastructure

Allen, thank you for doing this. Regarding lack of personal access to anything but Linux, I'll take this as an opportunity to remind everyone that ASF committers (not just limited to Hadoop committers) are entitled to a free MSDN license, which can get you a Windows VM for validating Windows issue

ASF OS X Build Infrastructure

Some of you may not know that the ASF actually does have an OS X machine (a Mac mini, so it’s not a speed demon) in the build infrastructure. While messing around with getting all? of the trunk jobs reconfigured to do Java 8 and separate maven repos, I noticed that this box ten

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-13182) Cannot find a link to the source code repository for Hadoop

Sebb created HADOOP-13182: - Summary: Cannot find a link to the source code repository for Hadoop Key: HADOOP-13182 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13182 Project: Hadoop Common Issu

Jenkins build is back to normal : Hadoop-common-trunk-Java8 #1508

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-dev-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: common-dev-h...@hadoop.apache.org

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-13181) WASB append support: getPos incorrect

Bogdan Raducanu created HADOOP-13181: Summary: WASB append support: getPos incorrect Key: HADOOP-13181 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13181 Project: Hadoop Common Issue

Build failed in Jenkins: Hadoop-common-trunk-Java8 #1507

See Changes: [aajisaka] YARN-5107. TestContainerMetrics fails. (aajisaka) -- [...truncated 5314 lines...] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 5.426 sec - in

Re: Is Hadoop's TooRunner thread-safe?

I'd rather move new code to JCommander; its way, way better at parsing, as it uses annotation + introspection for its binding > On 18 May 2016, at 19:05, Chris Nauroth wrote: > > Hello, > > Thank you for reporting this. The root cause is that commons-cli > OptionBuilder is not thread-safe. >

Re: Hadoop CI with alternate architectures.

> On 18 May 2016, at 16:29, Allen Wittenauer wrote: > > > > That’s really a question for infrastructure-...@apache.org . They > manage the ASF build infrastructure which Apache Hadoop and lots of other > projects utilize. (Bigtop uses something custom, which I think is funded by > Cl

Re: [DISCUSS] Release blocker HADOOP-12893 (LICENSE and NOTICE files)

> so I'm thinking this is not a problem. We need to update the patch to address the above comments. Especially, we need to investigate what dependency is in binary tarball or not. The problem I described influences not only binary tar ball, but also binaries which is deployed on maven. We need to

Re: [DISCUSS] Release blocker HADOOP-12893 (LICENSE and NOTICE files)

Quoting from offline discussion by Akira's comment: In HADOOP-12893, the LGPL2.1 dependencies are as follows: > Logback Core Module > jdiff > Javaassist They are not included in binary tarball. > FindBugs-jsr305 jsr305-3.0.0.jar is included in binary tarball. This is actually New BSD license. ht

Re: [DISCUSS] Release blocker HADOOP-12893 (LICENSE and NOTICE files)

> We used to say "the src tarball is the only official release artifact, the > bin tarball and jars are only provided as a convenience", but I don't think > we're actually allowed to do that. Yes, I know it's not useful for end users. I'd like to clarify the problems we're facing here. Currently,