Re: [DISCUSS] drop mapreduce-pipes

2020-01-06 Thread Esteban Gutierrez
As long as there is a proper announcement and deprecation path I'm +1. I know some third party products relied on hadoop pipes as a workaround to run parallelized version of their existing binaries, so assuming some are still being used people should be aware of this proposal. Thanks! esteban.

Re: [DISCUSS] Changing the default class path for clients

2017-04-03 Thread Esteban Gutierrez
I agreed with Andrew too. Users have relied for years on `hadoop classpath` for their script to launch jobs or other tools, perhaps no the best idea to change the behavior without providing a proper deprecation path. thanks! esteban. -- Cloudera, Inc. On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Andrew

Re: about CHANGES.txt

2015-03-13 Thread Esteban Gutierrez
JIRA already provides a report: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?version=12327179styleName=HtmlprojectId=12310240 cheers, esteban. -- Cloudera, Inc. On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Sean Busbey bus...@cloudera.com wrote: So long as you include the issue number, you

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9737) JarFinder#getJar should delete the jar file upon destruction of the JVM

2013-07-16 Thread Esteban Gutierrez (JIRA)
Esteban Gutierrez created HADOOP-9737: - Summary: JarFinder#getJar should delete the jar file upon destruction of the JVM Key: HADOOP-9737 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9737