Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.0

+1 (binding) Verified the signatures and hashes for both src and binary tars. Built from the source, the binary distribution and the documentation. Started a single node cluster and tested the following: - Started HDFS cluster, verified the hdfs CLI commands such ls, copying data back and forth, v

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.0

Tsuyoshi, thanks for bringing up HDFS-6833. However, given it is a boundary condition (and should not cause issues when for files with replication factor 3), we should perhaps target this into 2.6.1 and not block this release. Thoughts? On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Tsuyoshi OZAWA wrote: > +0

Re: Thinking ahead to hadoop-2.6

es specified > by > > storage policies assigned to the files/directories. Cluster admin could > > disable the feature by simply not configuring any storage type and not > > setting any storage policy as before. As Suresh mentioned, HDFS-6584 is > > in the final stages

Re: Thinking ahead to hadoop-2.6

I actually would like to see both archival storage and single replica memory writes to be in 2.6 release. Archival storage is in the final stages of getting ready for branch-2 merge as Nicholas has already indicated on the dev mailing list. Hopefully HDFS-6581 gets ready sooner. Both of these featu

Re: Updates on migration to git

, Suresh Srinivas wrote: > Karthik, > > I would like to see detailed information on how this migration will be > done, how it will affect the existing project and commit process. This > should be done in a document that can be reviewed instead of in an email > thread on an ad-ho

Re: Updates on migration to git

Karthik, I would like to see detailed information on how this migration will be done, how it will affect the existing project and commit process. This should be done in a document that can be reviewed instead of in an email thread on an ad-hoc basis. Was there any voting on this in PMC and should

Re: hadoop-2.5 - June end?

We should also include extended attributes feature for HDFS from HDFS-2006 for release 2.5. On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Folks, > > As you can see from the Roadmap wiki, it looks like several items are > still a bit away from being ready. > > I think rather than wait

Re: #Contributors on JIRA

Last time we cleaned up names of people who had not contributed in a long time. That could be an option. On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Karthik Kambatla wrote: > Hi devs > > Looks like we ran over the max contributors allowed for a project, again. I > don't remember what we did last time and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.4.0

+1 (binding) Verified the signatures and hashes for both src and binary tars. Built from the source, the binary distribution and the documentation. Started a single node cluster and tested the following: # Started HDFS cluster, verified the hdfs CLI commands such ls, copying data back and forth, v

Re: Thinking ahead to 2.4

Arun, Some of the previously 2.4 targeted features were made available in 2.3: - Heterogeneous storage support - Datanode cache The following are being targeted for 2.4: - Use protobuf for fsimge (already in) - ACLs (in trunk. In a week or so, this will be merged to branch-2.4) - Rolling upgrades

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-10311) Cleanup vendor names in the code base

Suresh Srinivas created HADOOP-10311: Summary: Cleanup vendor names in the code base Key: HADOOP-10311 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10311 Project: Hadoop Common

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-10292) Restore HttpServer from branch-2.2 in branch-2

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-10292. -- Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed I have committed this change to

Re: Logistics for releasing 2.4

There is not much progress on symlinks issue. I think we should move forward with 2.4 release with symlinks disabled. Status of 2.4 features from HDFS so far: - HDFS-2832 Heterogeneous storage support has been merged - HDFS-5535 rolling upgrades work is in progress - HDFS-4685 ACL related work is

Re: Possible Length issue

Can you please share the details on the issue you found? Sent from phone > On Dec 29, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Dhaivat Pandya wrote: > > Actually, we can relegate this as a non-issue; I have found a different > source of error in the system. > > > On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 3:03 PM, Dhaivat Pandya > w

Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-2832 Heterogeneous Storage Phase 1 to trunk

n.pdffor > the details. Once the feature is > merged into trunk, we will continue to test and fix any bugs that may be > found on trunk as well as add further tests as outlined in the test plan. > > The bulk of the design and implementation was done by Suresh Srinivas, > Sanjay

Re: [VOTE] Merge HDFS-4949 to trunk

I posted a comment in the other thread about feature branch merges. My preference is to make sure the requirements we have for regular patches be applied to feature branch patch as well (3 +1s is the only exception). Also adding details about what functionality is missing (I posted a comment on HD

Re: [DISCUSS] What is the purpose of merge vote threads?

I agree with what Nicholas is saying. Feature branch merge votes are similar to traditional review-commit process. That means the code should be ready, and pass the Jenkins build tests. Also similar to regular patches where one describes what changes the patch brings, having an updated design docu

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.2.0

+1 (binding) On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Folks, > > I've created a release candidate (rc0) for hadoop-2.2.0 that I would like > to get released - this release fixes a small number of bugs and some > protocol/api issues which should ensure they are now stable and will

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-10042) Heap space error during copy from maptask to reduce task

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-10042. -- Resolution: Invalid > Heap space error during copy from maptask to reduce t

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-10035) Cleanup TestFilterFileSystem

Suresh Srinivas created HADOOP-10035: Summary: Cleanup TestFilterFileSystem Key: HADOOP-10035 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10035 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-10029) Specifying har file to MR job fails in secure cluster

Suresh Srinivas created HADOOP-10029: Summary: Specifying har file to MR job fails in secure cluster Key: HADOOP-10029 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10029 Project: Hadoop

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-10020) disable symlinks temporarily

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10020?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-10020. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.1.2-beta Release Note: During review

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-10023) Add https support in HDFS

Suresh Srinivas created HADOOP-10023: Summary: Add https support in HDFS Key: HADOOP-10023 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10023 Project: Hadoop Common Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-10022) Add support for per project https support

Suresh Srinivas created HADOOP-10022: Summary: Add support for per project https support Key: HADOOP-10022 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10022 Project: Hadoop Common

Re: 2.1.2 (Was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.1.1-beta)

(This time copying all the lists) I am +1 for naming the new branch 2.2.0. On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > Guys, > > I took a look at the content in 2.1.2-beta so far, other than the > critical fixes such as HADOOP-9984 (symlinks) and few others in YARN/MR, > there is f

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.1.1-beta

+1 (binding) Verified the signatures and hashes for both src and binary tars. Built from the source, the binary distribution and the documentation. Started a single node cluster and tested the following: # Started HDFS cluster, verified the hdfs CLI commands such ls, copying data back and forth,

Re: symlink support in Hadoop 2 GA

I agree that this is an important change. However, 2.2.0 GA is getting ready to rollout in weeks. I am concerned that these changes will add not only incompatible changes late in the game, but also possibly instability. Java API incompatibility is some thing we have avoided for the most part and I

Re: [DISCUSS] Hadoop SSO/Token Server Components

> One aside: if you come across a bug, please try to fix it upstream and > then merge into the feature branch rather than cherry-picking patches > or only fixing it on the branch. It becomes very awkward to track. -C Related to this, when refactoring the code, generally required for large feature

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9745) TestZKFailoverController test fails

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9745. - Resolution: Not A Problem > TestZKFailoverController test fa

[jira] [Reopened] (HADOOP-9745) TestZKFailoverController test fails

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas reopened HADOOP-9745: - > TestZKFailoverController test fa

[jira] [Reopened] (HADOOP-9381) Document dfs cp -f option

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9381?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas reopened HADOOP-9381: - Notices that the document still does not capture -f option, though the copy command does

Re: [jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9822) create constant maxCapacity in RetryCache rather than hard-coding 16 in RetryCache constructor

I do not think this is worth making a change. Even Java code has these kinds of instances. This is essentially private static used in one single class, only in the constructor. That said, if you still want to make this change, it is not maxCapacity. It is DEFAULT_INITIAL_CAPACITY. On Aug 1, 20

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9793) RetryInvocationHandler uses raw types that should be parameterized

Suresh Srinivas created HADOOP-9793: --- Summary: RetryInvocationHandler uses raw types that should be parameterized Key: HADOOP-9793 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9793 Project

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9792) Retry the methods that are tagged @AtMostOnce along with @Idempotent

Suresh Srinivas created HADOOP-9792: --- Summary: Retry the methods that are tagged @AtMostOnce along with @Idempotent Key: HADOOP-9792 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9792 Project

Re: [VOTE] Hadoop 1.2.1 release candidate 0 -- stable release

+1 (binding) Ran some HDFS commands, TestDFSIO and few other sample jobs on a single node cluster. Verified the signature as well. Regards, Suresh On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Matt Foley wrote: > Colleagues, > This is a stabilization release of the Hadoop-1.2 codeline. It has 18 > patche

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9770) RetryCache#state need not be volatile

Suresh Srinivas created HADOOP-9770: --- Summary: RetryCache#state need not be volatile Key: HADOOP-9770 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9770 Project: Hadoop Common Issue

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9764) MapReduce output issue

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9764. - Resolution: Invalid > MapReduce output is

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9762) RetryCache utility for implementing RPC retries

Suresh Srinivas created HADOOP-9762: --- Summary: RetryCache utility for implementing RPC retries Key: HADOOP-9762 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9762 Project: Hadoop Common

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9760) Move GSet and LightWeightGSet to hadoop-common

Suresh Srinivas created HADOOP-9760: --- Summary: Move GSet and LightWeightGSet to hadoop-common Key: HADOOP-9760 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9760 Project: Hadoop Common

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-8873) Port HADOOP-8175 (Add mkdir -p flag) to branch-1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8873?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-8873. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.3.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed I committed

Re: protobuf 2.5.0 failure should be known by wiki

> Now I know HADOOP-9346 and HADOOP-9440 for enabling protobuf 2.5.0, but > these issues have been left for months. > Have you seen the reason why these issues have not been fixed; see - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9346?focusedCommentId=13657835&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.syst

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9717) Add retry flag/retry attempt count to the RPC requests

Suresh Srinivas created HADOOP-9717: --- Summary: Add retry flag/retry attempt count to the RPC requests Key: HADOOP-9717 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9717 Project: Hadoop Common

Re: Bringing Hadoop to Fedora

Isn't Jetty used by WebHDFS? Given that, Jetty performance is still important. On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:06 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote: > [moving bigtop to bcc] > > Tim, > > Except from HADOOP-9680 which has significant code changes and some false > changes (which I did not go thru), all other

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9702) FileSystem should fail create call with OverWrite and Append flags

Suresh Srinivas created HADOOP-9702: --- Summary: FileSystem should fail create call with OverWrite and Append flags Key: HADOOP-9702 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9702 Project

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9690) RPC Client#setupIOStreams declares throws InterruptedException that is not necessary

Suresh Srinivas created HADOOP-9690: --- Summary: RPC Client#setupIOStreams declares throws InterruptedException that is not necessary Key: HADOOP-9690 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9690

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9688) Add globally unique request ID to RPC requests

Suresh Srinivas created HADOOP-9688: --- Summary: Add globally unique request ID to RPC requests Key: HADOOP-9688 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9688 Project: Hadoop Common

Re: creating 2.2.0 version in JIRA

I have added in to HDFS, HADOOP, MAPREDUCE projects. Can someone add it for YARN? On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:35 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote: > When Arun created branch-2.1-beta he stated: > > > The expectation is that 2.2.0 will be limited to content in > branch-2.1-beta > > and we stick to stab

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9615) Hadoop Jar command not working when used with Spring ORM

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9615?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9615. - Resolution: Invalid I agree that this is not a Hadoop issue. I am going to close this

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-8958) ViewFs:Non absolute mount name failures when running multiple tests on Windows

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-8958. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0.0) 2.1.0-beta

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9131) TestLocalFileSystem#testListStatusWithColons cannot run on Windows

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9131. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0.0) 2.1.0-beta

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-8957) AbstractFileSystem#IsValidName should be overridden for embedded file systems like ViewFs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8957?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-8957. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.1.0-beta Hadoop Flags: Reviewed I merged

Re: HADOOP-8545 OpenStack Swift patch ready for commit -reviewers needed

Steve, I will review this. Might need a couple of days though. On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Steve Loughran wrote: > Hi, > > We've got the HADOOP-8545< > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8545>patch > stable enough that I'd like it checked in and in the 2.1 beta so that > we can see

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9597) FileSystem open() API is not clear if FileNotFoundException is throw when the path does not exist

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9597. - Resolution: Invalid > FileSystem open() API is not clear if FileNotFoundExcept

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-8562) Enhancements to support Hadoop on Windows Server and Windows Azure environments

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8562?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-8562. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0.0) 2.0.5-beta

[jira] [Reopened] (HADOOP-8562) Enhancements to support Hadoop on Windows Server and Windows Azure environments

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8562?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas reopened HADOOP-8562: - Reopening the issue for merging. > Enhancements to support Hadoop

Re: [PROPOSAL] change in bylaws to remove Release Plan vote

+1 On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 2:10 PM, Matt Foley wrote: > Hi all, > This has been a side topic in several email threads recently. Currently we > have an ambiguity. We have a tradition in the dev community that any > committer can create a branch, and propose release candidates from it. Yet > t

Re: [VOTE] - Release 2.0.5-beta

What I am seeing times and again in these endless discussion threads is > this: > > a) "downstream or bigtop: we are seeing a bunch of integration issues > with > every new feature introduced/something even a commit made" > b) "feature developers: no-no, these features are developed for a l

Re: [VOTE] - Release 2.0.5-beta

> Assuming that you are talking about HDFS features when you say > > "features going into a beta on a very short short timetable" and > > "laundry list" etc, > > > > No, that would not be a correct assumption. > > So these features are not something that are impulsively developed > > and irrespons

Re: [VOTE] - Release 2.0.5-beta

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 9:25 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote: > The other thread or "vote" or whatever at least served the purpose in fresh > surfacing of concerns. Talk of new features going in to a "beta" on a very > short short timetable is concerning for anyone with experience working on > large sof

Re: [VOTE] - Release 2.0.5-beta

This is the course that we were taking before the unfortunate disruption. We should be able to meet both the stabilization goals and compatibility goals quickly with this proposal. I personally am willing to invest a lot of time in testing, code reviews and work on adding missing functionality to e

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9523) Provide a generic IBM java vendor flag in PlatformName.java to support non-Sun JREs

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9523?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9523. - Resolution: Fixed Marking the issue as resolved. > Provide a gene

Re: [VOTE] Hadoop release candidate 1.2.0-rc1

Matt, Thanks for getting the release out. I downloaded the tarballs and verified the checksums. I ran the following tests on a single node cluster: - Ensured a newly installed cluster can be started and is functional. Also checked the cluster restarts. - Checked webUI for HDFS and MapReduce. - Te

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9537) Backport AIX patches to branch-1

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9537?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9537. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: 1.3.0) 1.2.0

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9472) Cleanup hadoop-config.cmd

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9472. - Resolution: Fixed I committed this patch to branch-1-win. Thank you Ivan

Re: Heads up - 2.0.5-beta

Eli, I will post a more detailed reply soon. But one small correction: I'm also not sure there's currently consensus on what an incompatible > change is. For example, I think HADOOP-9151 is incompatible because it > broke client/server wire compatibility with previous releases and any > change th

Re: Heads up - 2.0.5-beta

Thanks for starting this discussion. I volunteer to do a final review of protocol changes, so we can avoid incompatible changes to API and wire protocol post 2.0.5 in Common and HDFS. We have been working really hard on the following features. I would like to get into 2.x and see it reach HDFS use

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9452) Windows install scripts bugfixes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9452?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9452. - Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed I committed the patch to trunk. Thank

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9480) The windows installer should pick the config from src\packages\win\template\conf

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9480. - Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed I committed the patch to branch-1-win

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9071) configure ivy log levels for resolve/retrieve

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9071. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.2.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Committed the

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9253) Capture ulimit info in the logs at service start time

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9253?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9253. - Resolution: Fixed Target Version/s: 2.0.3-alpha, 1.2.0 (was: 1.2.0, 2.0.3

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9442) Splitting issue when using NLineInputFormat with compression

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9442. - Resolution: Invalid Jira is for reporting bugs and not for asking bugs. Please use the

Re: [Vote] Merge branch-trunk-win to trunk

Adding other mailing lists I missed earlier. Cos, There is progress being made on that ticket. Also it has nothing to do with that. Please follow the discussion here and why this happened due to an invalid commit that was reverted - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-4615?focusedComment

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9408) misleading description for net.topology.table.file.name property in core-default.xml

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9408. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0.5-beta Committed to both trunk and branch-2

Re: [PROPOSAL] Hadoop branch-1.2

Steve, is there a timeline all these changes will be ready? If it is not going to be ready soon, perhaps these changes could be consider for 1.3? On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Matt Foley wrote: > Steve, I'm okay with this, but > HADOOP-9258 i

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9326) maven-surefire-plugin:2.12.3:test (default-test) on project hadoop-common: There a test failures.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9326. - Resolution: Invalid > maven-surefire-plugin:2.12.3:test (default-test) on proj

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-8796) commands_manual.html link is broken

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8796?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-8796. - Resolution: Not A Problem Resolving the bug as "Not A Pr

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9378) start_thrift_server can not run successfully.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9378?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9378. - Resolution: Not A Problem > start_thrift_server can not run successfu

Re: [Vote] Merge branch-trunk-win to trunk

Thank you all for voting and participating in the discussions. With 11 +1s from committers (more than the required 3 +1s from active committers per the Hadoop bylaws), 1 +0, 8 +1s from other contributors, and no -1s the merge vote passes. I have committed the consolidated patch from branch-trunk-

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-9373) Merge CHANGES.branch-trunk-win.txt to CHANGES.txt

Suresh Srinivas created HADOOP-9373: --- Summary: Merge CHANGES.branch-trunk-win.txt to CHANGES.txt Key: HADOOP-9373 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9373 Project: Hadoop Common

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9368) Add timeouts to new tests in branch-trunk-win

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9368. - Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed +1. I committed the patch. Thank you

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9250) Windows installer bugfixes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9250. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1-win Hadoop Flags: Reviewed +1. I

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9232) JniBasedUnixGroupsMappingWithFallback fails on Windows with UnsatisfiedLinkError

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9232. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: trunk-win Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Committed

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9356) remove remaining references to cygwin/cygpath from scripts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9356. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: trunk-win Hadoop Flags: Reviewed I

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9354) Windows native project files missing license headers

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9354?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9354. - Resolution: Fixed Hadoop Flags: Reviewed +1. I committed the patch to branch

Re: [Vote] Merge branch-trunk-win to trunk

On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Harsh J wrote: > Have we agreed (and stated it somewhere proper) that a -1 obtained for > a Windows CI build for a test-patch will not block the ongoing work > (unless it is Windows specific) and patches may still be committed to > trunk despite that? > This threa

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9348) address TODO in winutils to add more command line usage and examples

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9348. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: trunk-win Hadoop Flags: Reviewed +1

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9347) add instructions to BUILDING.txt describing how to build on Windows

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9347?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9347. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: trunk-win Hadoop Flags: Reviewed I

Re: [Vote] Merge branch-trunk-win to trunk

e able to run nightly tests to > > validate everything still compiles/runs. This is not a blocker for me > > because we often rely on individuals and groups to test Hadoop, but I do > > think we need to have this discussion before we put it in. > > > > --Bobby > >

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9279) Document the need to build hadoop-maven-plugins for eclipse and separate project builds

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9279. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.0.4-beta Hadoop Flags: Reviewed I

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9309) test failures on Windows due to UnsatisfiedLinkError in NativeCodeLoader#buildSupportsSnappy

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9309. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: trunk-win Hadoop Flags: Reviewed I

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9313) Remove spurious mkdir from hadoop-config.cmd

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9313. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: trunk-win Hadoop Flags: Reviewed +1 for

Re: Heads up - merge branch-trunk-win to trunk

: > Thanks for the update Suresh. Has any testing been done on the branch on > Linux aside from running the unit tests? > > Thanks, > Eli > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Suresh Srinivas >wrote: > > > The support for Hadoop on Windows was proposed in >

Heads up - merge branch-trunk-win to trunk

The support for Hadoop on Windows was proposed in HADOOP-8079 almost a year ago. The goal was to make Hadoop natively integrated, full-featured, and performance and scalability tuned on Windows Server or Windows Azure. We are happy to announce that

Re: Release numbering for branch-2 releases

On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote: > I think that using "-(alpha,beta)" tags on the release versions is a really > bad idea. Why? Can you please share some reasons? I actually think alpha and beta and stable/GA are much better way to set the expectation of the quality of a re

Re: Release numbering for branch-2 releases

On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Arun C Murthy wrote: > > On Feb 1, 2013, at 2:34 AM, Tom White wrote: > > Whereas Arun is proposing > > > > 2.0.0-alpha, 2.0.1-alpha, 2.0.2-alpha, 2.1.0-alpha, 2.2.0-beta, 2.3.0 > > > > and the casual observer might expect there to be a stable 2.0.1 (say) > > on

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9271) revert Python build scripts from branch-trunk-win

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9271?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9271. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: trunk-win Hadoop Flags: Reviewed I

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9266) correct javac, findbugs, and release audit warnings on branch-trunk-win

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9266. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: trunk-win Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Committed

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9245) mvn clean without running mvn install before fails

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9245?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9245. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.0.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed I committed

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-8580) ant compile-native fails with automake version 1.11.3

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8580?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-8580. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.2.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed I committed

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-9197) Some little confusion in official documentation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Suresh Srinivas resolved HADOOP-9197. - Resolution: Invalid Jason, for now I am going to resolve this jira as invalid, since

  1   2   3   >