Re: [DISCUSS] Merge Jersey upgrade(HADOOP-9613) to trunk

Thanks all for your reply! Based on discussion here, I merged HADOOP-9613 to trunk after the reviews. Thank you for the great helps. The problems reported on HADOOP-9613 by Wangda, Li, and Sunil is filed as YARN-5275. I'll also take a look at it. I believe this change is a great step for

Re: [DISCUSS] Merge Jersey upgrade(HADOOP-9613) to trunk

+1. Awesome effort Tsuyoshi. This has been blocking compression on the wire too. On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 11:24 AM, Colin McCabe wrote: > +1 for updating this in trunk. Thanks, Tsuyoshi Ozawa. > > cheers, > Colin > > On Mon, May 9, 2016, at 12:12, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote: > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Merge Jersey upgrade(HADOOP-9613) to trunk

+1 for updating this in trunk. Thanks, Tsuyoshi Ozawa. cheers, Colin On Mon, May 9, 2016, at 12:12, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote: > Hi developers, > > We’ve worked on upgrading jersey(HADOOP-9613) for a years. It's > essential change to support complication with JDK8. It’s almost there. > > One

Re: [DISCUSS] Merge Jersey upgrade(HADOOP-9613) to trunk

+1 agreed. > On May 9, 2016, at 2:13 PM, Akira AJISAKA wrote: > > +1 for marking HADOOP-9613 as incompatible change and upgrading the version > in trunk. > > Thanks, > Akira > > On 5/9/16 12:12, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote: >> Hi developers, >> >> We’ve worked on

Re: [DISCUSS] Merge Jersey upgrade(HADOOP-9613) to trunk

+1 for marking HADOOP-9613 as incompatible change and upgrading the version in trunk. Thanks, Akira On 5/9/16 12:12, Tsuyoshi Ozawa wrote: Hi developers, We’ve worked on upgrading jersey(HADOOP-9613) for a years. It's essential change to support complication with JDK8. It’s almost there.

[DISCUSS] Merge Jersey upgrade(HADOOP-9613) to trunk

Hi developers, We’ve worked on upgrading jersey(HADOOP-9613) for a years. It's essential change to support complication with JDK8. It’s almost there. One concern to merge this to trunk is incompatibility. After the release of Jersey 1.13, the root element whose content is empty collection is