Re: [VOTE] Merge Absolute resource configuration support in Capacity Scheduler (YARN-5881) to trunk

2017-12-07 Thread Jian He
My late +1 > On Dec 7, 2017, at 7:38 PM, Sunil G wrote: > > Thank You all. > > We merged the branch to trunk and updated jiras accordingly. Thanks > everyone who helped in this feature. > > - Sunil and Wangda > > > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 10:13 PM Sunil G wrote: > >> And lastly +1 (binding

Re: [VOTE] Merge Absolute resource configuration support in Capacity Scheduler (YARN-5881) to trunk

2017-12-07 Thread Sunil G
Thank You all. We merged the branch to trunk and updated jiras accordingly. Thanks everyone who helped in this feature. - Sunil and Wangda On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 10:13 PM Sunil G wrote: > And lastly +1 (binding) from myself. > Vote passes with 6 (+1) bindings by considering Weiwei's vote as b

Re: [VOTE] Merge Absolute resource configuration support in Capacity Scheduler (YARN-5881) to trunk

2017-12-07 Thread Sunil G
And lastly +1 (binding) from myself. Vote passes with 6 (+1) bindings by considering Weiwei's vote as binding itself. Thank you very much for all who voted. I’ll merge to trunk by the end of today. - Sunil On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 8:08 AM Subramaniam V K wrote: > +1. > > Skimmed through the de

Re: [VOTE] Merge Absolute resource configuration support in Capacity Scheduler (YARN-5881) to trunk

2017-12-06 Thread Subramaniam V K
+1. Skimmed through the design doc and uber patch and seems to be reasonable. This is a welcome addition especially w.r.t. cloud deployments so thanks to everyone who worked on this. On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 8:18 PM, Rohith Sharma K S wrote: > +1 > > On Nov 30, 2017 7:26 AM, "Sunil G" wrote: >

Re: [VOTE] Merge Absolute resource configuration support in Capacity Scheduler (YARN-5881) to trunk

2017-12-04 Thread Rohith Sharma K S
+1 On Nov 30, 2017 7:26 AM, "Sunil G" wrote: > Hi All, > > > Based on the discussion at [1], I'd like to start a vote to merge feature > branch > > YARN-5881 to trunk. Vote will run for 7 days, ending Wednesday Dec 6 at > 6:00PM PDT. > > > This branch adds support to configure queue capacity as

Re: [VOTE] Merge Absolute resource configuration support in Capacity Scheduler (YARN-5881) to trunk

2017-12-04 Thread Weiwei Yang
+1 (non-binding) Thanks for getting this done Sunil. -- Weiwei On 5 Dec 2017, 4:06 AM +0800, Eric Payne , wrote: +1. Thanks Sunil for the work on this branch. Eric From: Sunil G ; Hdfs-dev ; Hadoop Common ; "mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org" http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hadoop-yarn

Re: [VOTE] Merge Absolute resource configuration support in Capacity Scheduler (YARN-5881) to trunk

2017-12-04 Thread Eric Payne
+1. Thanks Sunil for the work on this branch. Eric From: Sunil G To: "yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org" ; Hdfs-dev ; Hadoop Common ; "mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org" Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2017 7:56 PM Subject: [VOTE] Merge Absolute resource configuration

Re: [VOTE] Merge Absolute resource configuration support in Capacity Scheduler (YARN-5881) to trunk

2017-11-30 Thread Wangda Tan
+1, thanks Sunil! Wangda Tan On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Sunil G wrote: > Hi All, > > > Based on the discussion at [1], I'd like to start a vote to merge feature > branch > > YARN-5881 to trunk. Vote will run for 7 days, ending Wednesday Dec 6 at > 6:00PM PDT. > > > This branch adds suppor

[VOTE] Merge Absolute resource configuration support in Capacity Scheduler (YARN-5881) to trunk

2017-11-29 Thread Sunil G
Hi All, Based on the discussion at [1], I'd like to start a vote to merge feature branch YARN-5881 to trunk. Vote will run for 7 days, ending Wednesday Dec 6 at 6:00PM PDT. This branch adds support to configure queue capacity as absolute resource in capacity scheduler. This will help admins w