Thanks, Andrew and Joep.
+1 for maintaining wire and API compatibility, but moving to JDK8 in 3.0
best,
Colin
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Andrew Wang wrote:
> I took the liberty of adding line breaks to Joep's mail.
>
> Thanks for the great feedback Joep. The goal with 3.x is to maintain A
I took the liberty of adding line breaks to Joep's mail.
Thanks for the great feedback Joep. The goal with 3.x is to maintain API
and wire compatibility with 2.x, which I think addresses most of your
concerns. A 2.x client running on JDK7 would then still be able to talk to
a 3.x server running on
Here are some of our thought on the discussions of the past few days with
respect to backwards compatibility.
In general at Twitter we're not necessarily against backwards incompatible
changes per se.
*It depends on the "Return on Pain". While it is hard to quantify the
returns in the a
Hi Mayank,
> 1. We would be moving to Hadoop -3 (Not this year though) however I don't
> see we can do another JDK upgrade so soon. So the point I am trying to make
> is we should be supporting jdk 7 as well for Hadoop-3.
>
> We'll still be releasing 2.x releases for a while, with similar
feature
Hi Andrew,
I wish things are as simple as you are pointing out. At least they are not
for us so far.
Couple of things
1. We would be moving to Hadoop -3 (Not this year though) however I don't
see we can do another JDK upgrade so soon. So the point I am trying to make
is we should be supporting j
Thichphuoctien
On Mar 9, 2015 3:35 PM, "Andrew Wang" wrote:
> Hi Mayank,
>
> Note that Hadoop 3 does not mean the end of updates for Hadoop 2.x, which
> will keep supporting JDK7 for a while yet. Someone on the original thread
> also proposed keeping Hadoop 3 JDK7-source compatible to make backpo
Hi Mayank,
Note that Hadoop 3 does not mean the end of updates for Hadoop 2.x, which
will keep supporting JDK7 for a while yet. Someone on the original thread
also proposed keeping Hadoop 3 JDK7-source compatible to make backports to
2.x easier. I support this.
Note also that the jump from Hadoop
Hi Guys,
>From my prospective @ ebay we are not going to upgrade to JDK 8 any time
soon we just upgraded to 7 and not want to move further at least this year
so I will request you guys not to drop the support for JDK 7 as that would
be very crucial for us to move forward.
We also just completed o
Over the last few days, we have had lots of discussions that have intertwined
several major themes:
# When/why do we make major Hadoop releases?
# When/how do we move to major JDK versions?
# To a lesser extent, we have debated another theme: what do we do about trunk?
For now, let's park
