RE: Release numbering for 3.x leading up to GA

To: Andrew Wang <andrew.w...@cloudera.com> Cc: Gangumalla, Uma <uma.ganguma...@intel.com>; Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>; Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com>; common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Release numbering for 3.x leading up to GA Thanks Andrew. I

Re: Release numbering for 3.x leading up to GA

Thanks Andrew. I also had a talk with Kai offline. Agreed that we should try our best to finalize coder config changes for alpha1. On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:34 PM Andrew Wang wrote: > The sooner the better for incompatible changes, but at this point we are > explicitly

Re: Release numbering for 3.x leading up to GA

The sooner the better for incompatible changes, but at this point we are explicitly not guaranteeing any compatibility between alpha releases. For EC, my understanding is that we're still working on the coder configuration. Given that we're still working on L changes, I think it's possible that

Re: Release numbering for 3.x leading up to GA

Naming convention looks good. Thanks Andrew for driving this! Could you explain a little more on the criteria of cutting alpha1 / alpha2? What are the goals we want to achieve for alpha1? From EC's perspective, maybe we should target on having all compatibility-related changes in alpha1, like new

Re: Release numbering for 3.x leading up to GA

Hi folks, I think it's working, though it takes some time for the rename to propagate in JIRA. JIRA is also currently being hammered by spammers, which might be related. Anyway, the new "3.0.0-alpha1" version should be live for all four subprojects, so have at it! Best, Andrew On Thu, May 12,

Re: Release numbering for 3.x leading up to GA

Thanks Andrew for driving. Sounds good. Go ahead please. Good luck :-) Regards, Uma On 5/12/16, 10:52 AM, "Andrew Wang" wrote: >Hi all, > >Sounds like we have general agreement on this release numbering scheme for >3.x. > >I'm going to attempt some mvn and JIRA

Re: Release numbering for 3.x leading up to GA

Hi all, Sounds like we have general agreement on this release numbering scheme for 3.x. I'm going to attempt some mvn and JIRA invocations to get the version numbers lined up for alpha1, wish me luck. Best, Andrew On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:

Re: Release numbering for 3.x leading up to GA

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 8:18 AM, Karthik Kambatla wrote: > The naming scheme sounds good. Since we want to start out sooner, I am > assuming we are not limiting ourselves to two alphas as the email might > indicate. > > Also, as the release manager, can you elaborate on your

Re: Release numbering for 3.x leading up to GA

zh...@intel.com> > Cc: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: Release numbering for 3.x leading up to GA > > >> but I'm going to spend time on our first RC this week. > Sorry what does this mean? Did you mean the first RC version or > 3.0.0-alpha1 will be cut ou

RE: Release numbering for 3.x leading up to GA

Ok, got it. Thanks for the explanation. Regards, Kai From: Andrew Wang [mailto:andrew.w...@cloudera.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 5:41 AM To: Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> Cc: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Release numbering for 3.x leading up to GA >> but I'm go

Re: Release numbering for 3.x leading up to GA

> > >> but I'm going to spend time on our first RC this week. > Sorry what does this mean? Did you mean the first RC version or > 3.0.0-alpha1 will be cut out this week? > Anyway will try to get some tasks done sooner. > > First RC for whatever we name the first 3.0 alpha release. There's no need

RE: Release numbering for 3.x leading up to GA

essage- From: Andrew Wang [mailto:andrew.w...@cloudera.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 5:07 AM To: Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> Cc: common-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Release numbering for 3.x leading up to GA On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...

Re: Release numbering for 3.x leading up to GA

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Andrew Wang > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I wanted to confirm my version numbering plan for Hadoop 3.x. We had a > > related thread on this topic about a year

Re: Release numbering for 3.x leading up to GA

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Andrew Wang wrote: > Hi all, > > I wanted to confirm my version numbering plan for Hadoop 3.x. We had a > related thread on this topic about a year ago, mostly focusing on the > branch-2 maintenance releases: > >

Release numbering for 3.x leading up to GA

Hi all, I wanted to confirm my version numbering plan for Hadoop 3.x. We had a related thread on this topic about a year ago, mostly focusing on the branch-2 maintenance releases: