tasanuma commented on pull request #3538:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/3538#issuecomment-960354847
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscr
tasanuma commented on pull request #3538:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/3538#issuecomment-955873323
@tomscut Thanks for your thoughts. That makes sense to me.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and u
tasanuma commented on pull request #3538:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/3538#issuecomment-954558413
How about using the word of "port" instead of "clientPort" here, and adding
"clientPort" as the actual client server port for RBF in another JIRA?
--
This is an automated mess
tasanuma commented on pull request #3538:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/3538#issuecomment-954546028
Thanks for updating it, @tomscut.
I tried it with my RBF cluster. There is a client server (1.1.1.1), a DFS
Router (2.2.2.2), and NameNode. When a client sends a request to th
tasanuma commented on pull request #3538:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/3538#issuecomment-948371693
Thanks for updating the PR, @tomscut.
- I discussed with my colleagues, and they suggested that adding a new port
field would have less impact on users who are analyzing the a
