perfectly. I suspect that Hadoop does some "fun" with
class loading, but I am not sure, since I did not invested time into
this yet (still hope someone will tell me where could be a problem).
--
Kind regards, BM
Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely.
egular GlassFish it works fine.
Thanks! Case closed, was not Hadoop issue. :-)
--
Kind regards, BM
Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely.
y, but sounds like not Hadoop issue anymore.
--
Kind regards, BM
Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely.
(SunOS 5.11). Get Java 6 for appropriate
platform and that's it. It is just like Sun in their "best" traditions
continue to make a complete mess with their brands and thus
professionally confuse people as much as possible... I really hate
that.
--
Kind regards, BM
Things, that are st
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 12:36 AM, Edward Capriolo wrote:
> What is so confusing about putting Java in the name of every product? :)
...and use JNI. I hear you. :-)
--
Kind regards, BM
Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely.
_memory is turned off, then Java is gonna locks its VM
memory into non-swap area. So when system is trying to spawn a process
(chmod in your case) that is not really belongs to VM, process is
gonna get launched more in swap, which in your case might be very
small one.
HTH.
P.S. Or go my way ant g
>> > > had a "distributed process" that would be sufficient to say hadoop
>> > > technology does not infringe on this patent.
>> > >
>> > > I think it would be interesting to look deeply at each claim and
>> > > determine if hadoop could be designed to not infringe on these
>> > > patents, to deal with what if scenarios.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Ravi > >
>> > > wrote:
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > > I too read about that news. I don't think that it will be any
>> problem.
>> > > > However Google didn't invent the model.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks.
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Udaya Lakshmi
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> Hi,
>> > > >> As an user of hadoop, Is there anything to worry about Google
>> > > obtaining
>> > > >> the patent over mapreduce?
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Thanks.
>> > > >>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
--
Kind regards, BM
Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely.
you, SCO:
prove or shut up". The only stupid end-users started to purchase silly
copies. I'd say, SCO should be sued for this, because basically they
said for that Linux is stolen from them and is illegal, while it is
not true at all.
So I don't see the point here about Map Reduce...
ocking [him/her]self in a cell of
monastery for that whole Hadoop mission... :-)
--
Kind regards, BM
Things, that are stupid at the beginning, rarely ends up wisely.
