Re: [dbutils] Current Status

I will fix this, I do not use JDK 1.4 in production myself at this time. - Original Message - From: "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2003 3:39 AM Subject: Re: [dbutils] Current Status > > ProcedureUti

Re: [dbutils] Current Status

ProcedureUtils uses BitSet.clear(), which is a JDK 1.4 method. It's the only 1.4 only thing there, so I reckon it'd be good to try and fix it to work differently. That possible? Hen On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Juozas Baliuka wrote: > > It is report about code I added last week and status: > > 1.Handle

RE: [configuration] Should we update the current version?

Okay, I thought that was how it worked, but I couldn't remember. I think that configuration is in okay shape, and some work I am doing with Turbine means that having a released version would be nice. What is required to promote something? I have seen other things promoted, but I can't find the d

RE: [configuration] Should we update the current version?

The current XML configuration is a DOM4JConfiguration, and it seems to work quite well. I added a testcase for it, check out the sample test.xml file. However, I don't know what else is desired for the XML configuration, if someone can maybe post a list? Eric -Original Message- From: He

Re: [configuration] Should we update the current version?

Rodney Waldhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> what is required to cut a release of a sandbox component? >Promotion to commons "proper". We shouldn't be releasing stuff >from the sandbox, indeed our guidelines expressly prohibit it. As the main road

Re: [configuration] Should we update the current version?

On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > what is required to cut a release of a sandbox component? Promotion to commons "proper". We shouldn't be releasing stuff from the sandbox, indeed our guidelines expressly prohibit it. -

[configuration] Should we update the current version?

Hi all, The current version of configuration is 0.8.1, however, in keeping with most commons projects, it seems it should be 0.8.1-dev, is that correct? Also, over the past couple weeks I have contributed a CompositeConfigurator and a new ConfiguratorFactory. I would like to get a release out, w

cvs commit: jakarta-commons/betwixt/src/java/org/apache/commons/betwixt/digester ElementRule.java

rdonkin 2003/03/18 14:30:43 Modified:betwixt/src/resources dotbetwixt.dtd betwixt/src/java/org/apache/commons/betwixt/digester ElementRule.java Log: Made name attribute mandatory and added test for attribute to rule. Revision ChangesPa

SSLSocket hangs in commons-net-1.0.0

I'm trying to implement an FTP over SSL client and I'm having problems with the FTPClient in the commons-net API. I pass in a SocketFactory to the FTPClient class but it just hangs after the SSL handshake completes succesfully ( It never returns from the connect(...) method) Has anyone else tried t

RE: [LANG] Jira?

Glen, a colleague of mine posted a request to the Scarab user list regarding getting out a next beta, and the basic response is in the message here: http://scarab.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=users&msgNo=1503 I'm not deeply involved in the Scarab stuff, but it may be an Oracle 8i support issue

Commons SQL Proposal

Ladies and Gentlemen, Daniel Rall, Jason van Zyl, and James Strachan, et al., Hi, my name is Les Hazlewood, and I've been working with Java, SQL, and XML for quite a while now. I have started my own XML -> DDL converter project on sourceforge, as I wasn't aware that the Commons SQL project exi

Re: [VFS] FtpFileSystem and passive connections

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Mario Ivankovits" wr ites: >So maybe VFS should be able to handle such urls >"ftp://[EMAIL PROTECTED]@proxy:proxyport/" > >Do you agree. That's one for the VFS folks, but I do think the issues you've brought up lie in VFS, above the Commons Net layer. daniel

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16823] - Add a fixed order Comparator

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16823] - Add a fixed order Comparator

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16823] - Add a fixed order Comparator

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [validator] New Contribution

Cool, thanks - Original Message - From: "David Graham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 11:06 AM Subject: Re: [validator] New Contribution > Sounds like a Struts specific addition. Open an enhancement request and > attach patches to it. > > Prefix

Re: [LANG][UTIL] Where did WordWrapUtils go?

Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >wrapLine and wrapText came from Turbine I believe. wordWrap came from >String Taglib and there are bugs fixed for wordWrap in String Taglib's >StringW class currently. >Just to flag that a resurrection of this class ought to grab the word-wrap >code fro

Re: [validator] New Contribution

Sounds like a Struts specific addition. Open an enhancement request and attach patches to it. Prefix posts to commons-dev with [project] so people know which project the email applies to. David From: "Max Kremer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTE

New Contribution

Hi, I've been working with the validator for several months now and I'd like to make a contribution. My work with the validator has been entirely in Struts and most of my code is Struts related. I've developed a way to validate Map-Backed forms, how can I contribute this code? Should I do it

Re: [resources]ResourceBundle.getBundle

Actually, we'll be changing that to take the full properties file name instead of just the package so you can specify it however you like. David From: george stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [resou

Re: [LANG][UTIL] Where did WordWrapUtils go?

wrapLine and wrapText came from Turbine I believe. wordWrap came from String Taglib and there are bugs fixed for wordWrap in String Taglib's StringW class currently. Just to flag that a resurrection of this class ought to grab the word-wrap code from String Taglib. Hen On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Henn

[resources]ResourceBundle.getBundle

In the messages class, there's static method: public static Messages getMessages(String name) which does this: Resources resources = factory.getResources(name + ".LocalStrings"); This doesn't work for ResourceBundle.getBundle on W2K with JDK 1.3.1_04. You could use name of the form name + "_

Typed Accessors

Hello I was wondering if there was any code in commons (probably lang) providing typed accessor support. As you probably know with Java you have System.getProperty() which returns strings only, Map interface which returns Object, and code can become messy casting, using .intValue() etc. Within so

[GUMP] Build Failure - commons-jelly-tags-html

This email is autogenerated from the output from: Buildfile: build.xml init: [mkdir] Created dir: /home/rubys/j

Re: [LANG][UTIL] Where did WordWrapUtils go?

[util] got closed down (no possibility of release). I think I would support a StringWordUtils class in [lang] if it contains resonable methods (not too high level functionality). Stephen > from:"Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > date:Tue, 18 Mar 2003 09:19:33 > to:

[LANG][UTIL] Where did WordWrapUtils go?

Hi, we're using in the Turbine project some methods from the ex-Turbine StringUtils package which got moved into the commons-sandbox WordWrapUtils package. These got removed in December without any replacement. As we want to move this dated code out of Turbine and into commons, where would be th