DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20807.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20807.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19857.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19857.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mdiggory2003/06/16 07:29:31
Modified:math/xdocs developers.xml
math/src/java/org/apache/commons/math/stat
UnivariateImpl.java
math/src/test/org/apache/commons/math/stat
CertifiedDataTest.java
Log:
PR:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20782.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mdiggory2003/06/16 07:29:31
Modified:math/xdocs developers.xml
math/src/java/org/apache/commons/math/stat
UnivariateImpl.java
math/src/test/org/apache/commons/math/stat
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20813.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19857.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20815.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20815.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Please see
http://cvs.apache.org/~luehe/commons-el-1.0_RC1
for the release candidate deliverables.
I need one additional +1 vote in order to be able to proceed with the
release. ;-)
So far, I've already received +1s from Remy Maucherat and Patrick Luby.
Thanks,
Jan
Howdy,
+1. And I've actually taken a look at it, too! ;)
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
-Original Message-
From: Jan Luehe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] commons-el 1.0 release
Al Chou wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mdiggory2003/06/16 07:29:31
Modified:math/xdocs developers.xml
math/src/java/org/apache/commons/math/stat
UnivariateImpl.java
math/src/test/org/apache/commons/math/stat
jfclere 2003/06/16 10:05:13
Modified:daemon/src/native/nt/procrun Makefile procrun.c
Log:
Arrange win9x and add some debugs.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +5 -1 jakarta-commons-sandbox/daemon/src/native/nt/procrun/Makefile
Index: Makefile
mpoeschl2003/06/16 10:44:41
Modified:configuration PROPOSAL.html
Log:
add myself as initial committer
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +1 -0 jakarta-commons-sandbox/configuration/PROPOSAL.html
Index: PROPOSAL.html
+1, on package structure
(and if the hotel I'm in bothers to install an
ethernet in my room this after, I'll execute this plan barring any binding
-1s)
Also, don't both submitting a patch for this, I'm going to submit to the
power of GNU Emacs. :-)
Tim
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, J.Pietschmann
[ This message is crossposted between commons-dev and jpackage-discuss.
Please keep the crosspost while replying - most interested parties won't
be subscribed to more than one of the lists ]
Hi,
The jpackage project (http://www.jpackage.org/) is a volunteer project
devoted to providing
Mark R. Diggory wrote:
I've got a design decision to make that I'd like to get others opinion
on. Currently, the strategy in UnivariateImpl is to calculate the
rudimentary building blocks of the statistics and then calculate the
statistics in the getters (getVariance, getSkewness, getKurtosis
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
(1) Bean etiquette suggests getters are for bean properties, its
usually recommended that this means that they do nothing more than
return the value for a property. This is beneficial in our Univariate
case when calling a getter many times
I don't work on commons-logging so I won't speak to satisfying your request
but I am curious about why you need this behavior. I would *never* allow
all of my apps to share jars between them and upgrade them all at the same
time. The amount of testing that would require is simply unreasonable
Howdy,
I couldn't agree more, Senor Graham ;)
Yoav Shapira
Millennium ChemInformatics
-Original Message-
From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 3:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Logging packaging
I appear to occasionally get JUnit test failures from ValueServer and
RandomData Tests. This would appear to be because the mean sampled
values can sometimes deviate from the expected mean even for 1000 case
draws, I know this happens rarely, just enough over the last month or
so for me to
Here are the voting results
(see thread at
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg19833.html):
-
binding non-binding
+1 [3] [0]
+0 [0] [0]
-0 [0] [0]
-1 [0] [0]
Hey folks,
I would disagree if the jar sharing mechanism provided for versioning.
There are several ways to accomplish this, but the maven repository does
it in a very simple and practical way. All that would be left to
jpackage-type tools is the dynamic runtime classpaths.
--
Ryan Hoegg
I would disagree if the jar sharing mechanism provided for versioning.
There are several ways to accomplish this, but the maven repository does it
in a very simple and practical way. All that would be left to
jpackage-type tools is the dynamic runtime classpaths.
Saving disk space is the only
--- Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreou Andreas wrote:
Mark, I would go for the latter approach (the one on the p.s.) cause
it doesn't seem that complex to me...
Why not add a CachableUnivariateImpl class
that extends UnivariateImpl
and also keeps track in a cache the
Le lun 16/06/2003 à 21:17, David Graham a écrit :
I don't work on commons-logging so I won't speak to satisfying your request
but I am curious about why you need this behavior.
Because that's how it's done on linux systems:).
I would *never* allow
all of my apps to share jars between them
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
big snip
I'm talking strictly about UnivariateImpl at this time, I'm not quite
ready to delve into the Storage Implementations.
...another snip...
could be detected by the the Univariate
Implementation and such a
caching mechanism could be
jkeyes 2003/06/16 13:01:57
Modified:cli/src/java/org/apache/commons/cli Tag: cli_1_x
MissingValueException.java ValueValidator.java
OptionImpl.java AlreadySelectedException.java
InclusiveOptionGroup.java
mdiggory2003/06/16 13:42:25
Modified:math/src/java/org/apache/commons/math/stat
UnivariateImpl.java
Log:
This house-cleaning improves UnivariateImpl, in a number of ways.
1.) insertValue is abolished and its contents are now in addValue
2.)
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
If the split goes through,
the situation is likely to arise where log4j is used as a commons-logging
backend, but since log4j is not configured by default, all the commons-logging
logging will be automatically brocken. Come to think of it, this is exactly
what we have now,
mdiggory2003/06/16 13:58:53
Modified:math/src/java/org/apache/commons/math/stat Univariate.java
Log:
Correction of Javadoc errors that end up propigating into UnivarImpl and other
implementations.
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +24 -48
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17650.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17769.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17957.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7367.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15744.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16859.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mdiggory2003/06/16 14:24:30
Modified:math/src/java/org/apache/commons/math/stat Univariate.java
UnivariateImpl.java
Log:
More correction of Javadoc errors that end up propigating into UnivarImpl and other
implementations.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3
mdiggory2003/06/16 14:29:49
Modified:math/src/java/org/apache/commons/math/stat
StoreUnivariate.java
Log:
More correction of Javadoc errors.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +6 -6
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20782.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mdiggory2003/06/16 14:38:15
Modified:math/src/java/org/apache/commons/math/stat
UnivariateImpl.java
Log:
I'm not sure with this algorithm, but I'm going to add this test back into the
Variance that protects it from returning a value less than 0.
Hence the need to maintain commons-logging.jar AS-IS.
We already HAVE commons-logging-api.jar, we simply need to add new jar
files for each implementation 'flavor'. Consideration could be given to
including a commons-logging.properties file that configures the logger,
though there are
Hence the need to maintain commons-logging.jar AS-IS.
We already HAVE commons-logging-api.jar, we simply need to add new jar
files for each implementation 'flavor'. Consideration could be given to
including a commons-logging.properties file that configures the logger,
though there are pro/cons
--- Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I appear to occasionally get JUnit test failures from ValueServer and
RandomData Tests. This would appear to be because the mean sampled
values can sometimes deviate from the expected mean even for 1000 case
draws, I know this happens rarely,
dmitri 2003/06/16 18:30:21
Modified:jxpath/src/java/org/apache/commons/jxpath/ri/model/jdom
JDOMNodePointer.java JDOMNamespaceIterator.java
Log:
Temporary fix pending the release of the next version of JDOM,
which currently has an incompatible API change.
Al Chou wrote:
--- Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I appear to occasionally get JUnit test failures from ValueServer and
RandomData Tests. This would appear to be because the mean sampled
values can sometimes deviate from the expected mean even for 1000 case
draws, I know this
dmitri 2003/06/16 18:37:59
Modified:jxpath/src/java/org/apache/commons/jxpath/ri/model/dynabeans
DynaBeanPropertyPointer.java
Log:
Removed unnessary printStackTrace
Revision ChangesPath
1.8 +4 -5
dmitri 2003/06/16 18:39:51
Modified:jxpath/src/java/org/apache/commons/jxpath/util
ValueUtils.java
jxpath/src/test/org/apache/commons/jxpath/ri/model/beans
BeanModelTest.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16859.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20774.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17957.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
mdiggory03/06/13 15:41:27
jakarta-commons-sandbox/math/src/test/org/apache/commons/math/special - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, robert burrell donkin wrote:
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 10:43:41 +0100
From: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [beanutils] extending
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20744.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20744.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20744.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20744.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20744.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
60 matches
Mail list logo
