/ant-trax.jar:/data3/gump/ant/dist/lib/ant.jar:/data3/gump/ant/dist/lib/ant-nodeps.jar:/data3/gump/jakarta-commons/collections/build/commons-collections-20040517.jar:/data3/gump/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging.jar:/data3/gump/jakarta-commons/logging/dist/commons-logging-api.jar:/data3
Given all of the recent discussion of dependencies among commons
components, I think we should take a more conservative approach than we
have up to now, duplicating some code / functionality in a few place to
limit dependencies. If we do all of the things below, we will have no
hard
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
If this might make a serious problem in your environment, please let
me know.
Received three misgivings - how bad :-(
Tim Reilly wrote:
My personal thought on this is that 200+K is a lot. Is something like
osjava's gj-xml sufficient?
No - digester is much more than just an
What do you think about making these dependencies optional.
If digesterbeanutils are available, vfs will use them and
you could use
the new globals sections, else you are stick to the old
parsing with
their limitations (which might get more and more in the future).
In the case of
Ok, here is the initial version of the transaction package. TODOs:
- Add build.xml
- Refactor classes in memory package to XALRUCache to reflect Map
interface and have tx id in thread local instead of passing it over
- Add tx map to memory package
- Add PriorityLock to locking package
- Adapt to
Paul Smith wrote:
Yeah, that might work. If the current xml parsing code can deal with the
default xml file included in the dist that is accessed via the
VFS.getInstance() method, then if they need to load their own custom xml
file they could load it them selves... Perhaps that's the answer,
Although newly created package transaction is active and actually almost
feature complete as it has been factored out from the Jakarta Slide
Project. What is involved to make a release or is it pre-mature to think
about it now?
Oliver
Henri Yandell wrote:
I'm interested in finding out which
Right now the code for persisting sequences is in the transaction
package along with other code that transactionally modifies files.
Should we move it into the Id project or should we try to release both
packages along and have Id use Transation?
Still wondering...
Oliver
Tim Reilly wrote:
Id
I built jelly from CVS and replaced the one maven uses with the generated
jar, and there's only one failing test case.
This was without replacing dom4j.
If we can fix that one test case, we can look at the differences between
the new jar and Maven's and work out what the benefit is to moving
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29031.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
Your suggested removals sound fine to me ;)
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2004 11:34 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [general] improvements to the charter
Hi,
Yeah, Ant is good at generating manifests. The decision to use or not
use (and then remove) manifest files should be up to each component's
developers. I think we should encourage their use to assist in
dependency resolution.
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original
Phil Wrote
commons-beanutils doesn't seem to be used, so shouldn't be in project
xml
BeanUils is used in the BeanList stuff that I recently rectified but have
not moved back into src from test. I guess I am in favor of relegating this
to experimental and dropping the dependency for
Hi,
Whew, I'm glad other people already expressed their misgivings about
these new dependencies, as I agree with the concerns expressed.
Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics
-Original Message-
From: Mario Ivankovits [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 3:42 AM
Hola,
The first is shown via strikethrough's, the second is in red text.
On 'Removing Text':
[ X ] +1 Remove it
[ ] -1 Keep it
On 'Versioning the Charter':
[ X ] +1 Add a version
[ ] -1 No need to version things
I'm glad someone is picking this less glamorous piece up and working on
it ;)
ozeigermann2004/05/17 05:58:06
jakarta-commons-sandbox/transaction/src/test - New directory
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 16-May-04, at 21:17 Uhr, Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
wrote a GetStaticTag that works like this:
v:getStatic var=closeOperation className=javax.swing.JFrame
field=EXIT_ON_CLOSE/
That allowed me to then do:
frame title=Tree Frame var=frame size=400,400
A kind of related point, but much more delicate, is the signing of jars.
For several purposes, in particular for all the security-intrusion type
of things like Java-Web-Start-full-priviledges, it would be nice to
have signed jars. And it would be much more meaningful that such signed
jars are
Hi,
We sign distributions (but not individual jars) for nearly every Apache
project I work on. But when we sign these distributions, we do so with
the release manager's public key. There's no general Apache public key
for all of us to use that I'm aware of. Nor am I sure there should be
one,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29013.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29012.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29036.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29036.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Still no news on this item?
On 2004-05-13 17:20:38 Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
From: Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just for the records - i already posted a patch, maybe a
logging-committer might pick it up
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28933
Excellent, thank
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28918.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Yes, I had placed it into test a while back which reduced it to a build
time dependency as opposed to a runtime dependency. Originally, I was
attempting to isolate this as an example as opposed to a Class which
users would utilize, so I was working hard to remove it from the
distribution jar.
ggregory2004/05/17 10:06:11
Modified:codecproject.xml RELEASE-NOTES.txt default.properties
codec/src/java/org/apache/commons/codec overview.html
codec/xdocs index.xml
Log:
Change from 1.3-dev to 1.3 in preparation for release.
Revision Changes
imario 2004/05/17 10:38:32
Modified:vfs build.xml
Log:
commons-logging-1.0.3
jcifs-0.8.3
Revision ChangesPath
1.21 +2 -2 jakarta-commons-sandbox/vfs/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
imario 2004/05/17 10:39:26
Modified:vfs project.xml
Log:
commons-logging-1.0.3
Revision ChangesPath
1.30 +1 -1 jakarta-commons-sandbox/vfs/project.xml
Index: project.xml
===
RCS
imario 2004/05/17 10:53:08
Modified:vfs/src/java/org/apache/commons/vfs/impl
DefaultFileReplicator.java
Log:
BUG29007: Allow overloading of
filename-creation = createFilename()
and
file-creation = createFile()
Revision ChangesPath
1.17
imario 2004/05/17 10:56:35
Modified:vfs/src/java/org/apache/commons/vfs/impl
StandardFileSystemManager.java
Log:
BUG29007: Allow overloading of
FileReplicator = cretaeDefaultFileReplicator
Introduced GlobalConfiguration and moved configuration for
imario 2004/05/17 10:56:57
Modified:vfs/src/test/org/apache/commons/vfs/test
AbstractTestSuite.java
vfs/xdocs api.xml
vfs/src/java/org/apache/commons/vfs/impl
DefaultFileSystemManager.java providers.xml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29007.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
imario 2004/05/17 11:22:17
Modified:vfs/src/java/org/apache/commons/vfs/provider
AbstractFileName.java
vfs/src/test/org/apache/commons/vfs/provider/smb/test
FileNameTestCase.java
Log:
PR: 29007
Submitted by:Anthony
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29007.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
imario 2004/05/17 11:25:51
Modified:vfs/xdocs download.xml
Log:
Changed commons-logging path (BUG29007) and updated the version-numbers of the other
dependencies
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +18 -14jakarta-commons-sandbox/vfs/xdocs/download.xml
Index:
I used DynaBeans to enable addValue as well. I am +1 to dropping from 1.0 so we can
remove this dependency. Not a bad idea to eventually produce an extensions, optional
or examples jar as well.
Frequency is kind of basic, but it could in theory also fit into this category, since
it is the
imario 2004/05/17 11:30:45
Added: vfs/src/java/org/apache/commons/vfs/example
ShowProperties.java
Log:
PR: 29007
Submitted By: Anthony Goubard ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Example showing how to resolv Files and prints their filename-components and
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29007.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
dirkv 2004/05/17 11:36:45
Modified:dbcp/src/test/org/apache/commons/dbcp TestManual.java
Log:
Bugzilla Bug 28912: (PoolingDriver) Connection re-use conflates logical and physical
connections
- JUnit test
(bug reported by Ken Arnold)
Revision ChangesPath
1.19
Hi,
What you are telling, it seems, is that there is a key practice at
Apaache, amazing!
Yup, and there has been for a long time ;) I think we're decent at
keeping KEYS files and documenting the signing of a release as part of
the SOP for cutting a new release. Keep in mind I'm speaking for
.
The current state is 'Failed', for reason 'Build Failed'
Full details are available at:
http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/jelly-tags/commons-jelly-tags-jsl/index.html
That said, some snippets follow:
Gump provided these annotations:
- Info - Sole jar [commons-jelly-tags-jsl-20040517.jar
.
The current state is 'Failed', for reason 'Build Failed'
Full details are available at:
http://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/jelly-tags/commons-jelly-tags-define/index.html
That said, some snippets follow:
Gump provided these annotations:
- Info - Sole jar [commons-jelly-tags-define-20040517
/xalan-unbundled.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/xml-commons/java/external/build/xml-apis.jar
org.apache.tools.ant.Main -debug
-Dgump.merge=/usr/local/gump/public/gump/work/merge.xml -Dbuild.sysclasspath=only
-Djaxen.jar=/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jaxen/target/jaxen-20040517.jar dist
://brutus.apache.org:8080/gump/jakarta-commons/commons-betwixt/index.html
That said, some snippets follow:
Gump provided these annotations:
- Info - Sole jar [commons-betwixt-20040517.jar] identifier set to project name
- Info - Enable debug output, due to a sequence of 17 previous errors.
- Info - Failed
What you are telling, it seems, is that there is a key practice at
Apaache, amazing!
Distributions are to be signed. Individuals jars aren't code signed,
though. There is on-going work to establish an ASF Certificate Authority
server, and that will help to further the authenticated
/target/jaxen-20040517.jar dist
[Working Directory:
/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-commons/latka]
CLASSPATH :
/usr/local/j2sdk1.4.2_04/lib/tools.jar:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jaka
rta-commons/latka/target/classes:/usr/local/gump/public/workspace/jakarta-co
mmons/latka/target/test
I just closed the last outstanding DBCP issue.
Time for a release I think, the enhancements are for the next
development cycle.
Lets say a RC1 this week and 1.2 final next week or so?
Unless somebody needs more time?
-- Dirk
-
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Paul Libbrech
t writes:
I keep believing, however, that such a thing should be done by Jexl or
something else... it makes no sense to need this getStatic, at least
compared to Java.
I agree. After I shot off my email I was going to reply to it and add
maybe the
Joel,
Thanks for the feedback.
1) Is there a specific reason why ttest would throw an exception if there
is not sufficient data. In my case I would like to execute it with only 2
data (even if it does not mean anything). The developer should be smart
enough to make this test BEFORE calling the
i am more than a little confused about this whole issue. i've taken a
look in cvs and priority still seems to be in existence (and
undeprecated). when i looked at the gump record for sunday,
common-logging seems to have passed. can someone please either explain
where the log4j changes are and
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29013.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
imario 2004/05/17 13:14:33
Modified:vfs/src/java/org/apache/commons/vfs VfsLog.java
Log:
added private constructor
Revision ChangesPath
1.2 +6 -1
jakarta-commons-sandbox/vfs/src/java/org/apache/commons/vfs/VfsLog.java
Index: VfsLog.java
Please could 'Primitives' be added as a component within Commons
Thanks in advance
Stephen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know logger know this better than I, but in case quick answer help w/
timezones...
i am more than a little confused about this whole issue. i've taken a
look in cvs and priority still seems to be in existence (and
undeprecated). when i looked at the gump record for sunday,
common-logging
robert burrell donkin wrote:
i am more than a little confused about this whole issue. i've taken a
look in cvs and priority still seems to be in existence (and
undeprecated). when i looked at the gump record for sunday,
common-logging seems to have passed. can someone please either explain
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28358.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28358.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28358.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'm no expert on when to [or not to] cross post, but this looks like a good
topic for discussion in these two places at once.
regards
Adam
- Original Message -
From: Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 2:33
I guess you have not seen this:
http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/api/org/apache/log4j/package-summary.html
nor this
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-commons-devm=108436289322053w=2
At 10:09 PM 5/17/2004, robert burrell donkin wrote:
i am more than a little confused about this whole
At 10:33 PM 5/17/2004, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
The change was in the Category class, formerly the log methods accepted a
priority but this has change to a level now.
But it looks like the change isnt really backward compatible, i have tried
this now and got the following exception (patched
Go for it.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 17 May 2004, at 21:47, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
I guess you have not seen this:
http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/api/org/apache/log4j/package-
summary.html
technically it's a recommendation rather than a deprecation which is
why i was asking :)
nor this
On 17-May-04, at 21:44 Uhr, Daniel F. Savarese wrote:
[...] add static field access. Yet expression manipulation is limited
to JavaBean
properties (otherwise there would be no need for the invoke tag),
which makes
it seem like Jexl isn't the right place. If static field access were
to
be
please take into account that most old hands on jakarta commons use
filtering extensively to ensure they have some time to do coding
(rather than just reading mailing lists). cross posts may well be filed
into low priority directories. unless the rules of the commons-dev
mailing list are
On 17 May 2004, at 22:14, Adam R. B. Jack wrote:
please take into account that most old hands on jakarta commons use
filtering extensively to ensure they have some time to do coding
(rather than just reading mailing lists). cross posts may well be
filed
into low priority directories. unless the
On 17 May 2004, at 21:33, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
i am more than a little confused about this whole issue. i've taken a
look in cvs and priority still seems to be in existence (and
undeprecated). when i looked at the gump record for sunday,
common-logging seems to
We are pleased to announce the first HttpClient 3.0 release.
HttpClient 3.0 provides a wealth of features and enhancements that did
not make it into the 2.0 release. We have attempted to preserve API
compatibility as much as possible. In a relatively few cases API
compatibility with
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29050.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29049.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help
understanding the request please visit
http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-logging has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Mike,
I feel we need a little stronger and more focused sales pitch. This is going to be a
very important release for all of us and our message must be loud and clear with
regards to what this release is intended to be and what its intended target is. If we
fail to generate enough interest in
Grrr.
This time inline
---
Index: news.xml
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/jakarta-commons/httpclient/xdocs/news.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.26
diff -u -r1.26
Almost forgot. Javadocs need fixing. I'll take care of the problem tonight unless
someone beats me to it
Oleg
-Original Message-
From: Michael Becke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 6:11
To: Commons HttpClient Project
Subject: 3.0 alpha1 build
I've uploaded the
What in the Javadocs needs fixing?
Mike
On May 17, 2004, at 7:58 AM, Kalnichevski, Oleg wrote:
Almost forgot. Javadocs need fixing. I'll take care of the problem
tonight unless someone beats me to it
Oleg
-Original Message-
From: Michael Becke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May
Javadoc compiler reported 20 some warnings when I ran maven's site generate. Most of
those warnings seem to be related to the latest changes introduced with the most
recent patches
Oleg
-Original Message-
From: Michael Becke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 14:44
Congratulations dev,
I am looking forward to test the 3.0 alpa1 within my application!
Good work everybody, keep it up ;-)
King regards
thorsten
Michael Becke wrote:
I've uploaded the 3.0 alpha1 build to my apache account
http://www.apache.org/~mbecke/httpclient-3.0-alpha1/. Please have a
look
Hi Folks,
I'm not sure if this problem is still on CVS HEAD, but we're seeing it
against 2.0rc2. In StatusLine (line 139 in my version), when it walks
through the spaces, it is possible that the entire line was spaces (and
thus a malformed response). The code will throw an
Hi
I have a problem, I'm using HttpClient to connect to a website. The
intial page contains a redirect, I think through JavaScript, which spawns a new
browser. I need to get to the ne wbrowser to login. The initial HttpClient
invocation return a status code 200, I don't even see the
3xx
Hi Ed,
It depends on the content of the page returned. You can look at the
actual content returned (which should contain the JavaScript), and parse out
the redirect location. It may look something like this:
self.location.replace(/app/self-registration);
Then you can do a GET or POST
Chris
Thanks for the reply, unfortunately I can't see the Javascript content since it's
loaded
as a JavaScript source file. Do I have any other options.
Thanks
Chris Lamprecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ed,
It depends on the content of the page returned. You can look at the
actual
Do you mean the JavaScript is included, perhaps using an HTML tag like the
following?
script language=javascript type=text/javascript
src=/system/utd_jscript.js/script
(there may be other ways to include javascript source, I'm not an
HTML/javascript expert)
If this is the case, you should be
We are pleased to announce the first HttpClient 3.0 release.
HttpClient 3.0 provides a wealth of features and enhancements that did
not make it into the 2.0 release. We have attempted to preserve API
compatibility as much as possible. In a relatively few cases API
compatibility with
Mike,
Maven usually pre-reqs 1.3 as a build platform, I'm not sure about
runtime.
Would you like me to try and get it built/running under 1.2 for us?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Thorsten Scherler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on
18/05/2004 12:20:07 AM:
Congratulations dev,
I am
85 matches
Mail list logo
