psteitz 2004/08/15 23:45:37
Modified:math maven.xml
Log:
Added pregoals to copy NOTICE.txt to both distributions and to drop /experimental
from source distro.
Revision ChangesPath
1.6 +14 -1 jakarta-commons/math/maven.xml
Index: maven.xml
Phil Steitz wrote:
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
1) No NOTICE.txt files in ZIPs or JARs - Critical!!
Fixed, new distros up.
Will fix. Thanks.
2) Experimental .java files included in src ZIP
Ouch! Thought maven would exclude these. My bad.
Fixed.
3) I couldn't find the javadoc on the main website
To whom it may satisfy...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-configuration *no longer* has an issue.
Project State : 'Success'
Full
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30655.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi Matthew, could you hold on your code until [configuration] 1.0 is
released please ? I'd like to keep the focus on fixing the bugs for our
first release and include the enhancements in the 1.1 release. Thanks :)
Emmanuel Bourg
Inger, Matthew wrote:
Barring any objections, I'd like to commit
Pak, Young-rok wrote:
I want this feature in Commons-Configuration. I think it'll be easily add to current version. If you agree to my proposal, I will be able to help you.
Hi, this would certainly be a useful addition to [configuration] but
it's too late to include it in the 1.0 release. Could
Eric Pugh wrote:
Any suggestions on how to fix this? I am somewhere deep down in private
void setXmlProperty(String name, Object value) and quite lost!
Hehe welcome to the setXmlProperty hell ;) I think we'd better use comma
separated values for list properties in attributes:
test
attribute
Hi,
I believe this has already been fixed. The solution I used was:
test
array attribute=value1/
array attribute=value2/
array attribute=value3/
array attribute=value4/
/test
Using one comma seperated string would mean that attributes cannot
otherwise contain comma characters.
Kind
Ricardo Gladwell wrote:
Hi,
I believe this has already been fixed. The solution I used was:
test
array attribute=value1/
array attribute=value2/
array attribute=value3/
array attribute=value4/
/test
Using one comma seperated string would mean that attributes cannot
otherwise contain comma
--- Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kim van der Linde wrote:
I generally use the RandomX package that you can
find here.
Where is here?
Oeps, I forgot the link:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/hotbits/source/randomX/randomX.html
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30545.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
That sounds like a good plan to me Martin.
Thanks,
David
--- Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We voted on this a while back, and the outcome was positive. As far as
I'm
aware, all that needs to happen to complete the process is:
* Notify the PMC of the successful vote.
* Move the
Hi Simon,
You can post your enhancements to this list or we can discuss them
first. Buy the way, are you talking about SQLConnection pooling?
When describing/contributing your enhancements please seperate them
into individual patches, also think about javadoc JUnit tests for
each of them.
+1 to just start doing it.
Niall
- Original Message -
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 15, 2004 9:02 PM
Subject: [Validator] Completing the 1.1.3 GA release
We voted on this a while back, and the outcome was positive. As far as I'm
I also use this release without issue.
+1 (non-binding), lets get this thing out there!!!
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
EdgeTech, Inc.
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
- Original Message -
From: David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers
Well, I think should step back and ask a few design questions concerning
the objects that will use these Sample/Population variances and that
will assist us in their own design.
1.) Is it the case that a covariance matrix could be built off of
either Sample or Population Variances?
2.) Are
dirkv 2004/08/16 07:16:05
Modified:launcher build.xml
Log:
prepare for release
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +2 -2 jakarta-commons/launcher/build.xml
Index: build.xml
===
RCS file:
dirkv 2004/08/16 07:16:29
Modified:launcher project.xml
Log:
prepare for release
Revision ChangesPath
1.11 +3 -3 jakarta-commons/launcher/project.xml
Index: project.xml
===
RCS file:
dirkv 2004/08/16 07:17:21
Modified:launcher/xdocs downloads.xml
Added: launcher/xdocs release-notes-1.0.xml release-plan.xml
Log:
prepare for release
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +12 -7 jakarta-commons/launcher/xdocs/downloads.xml
Index:
I'm pretty sure CLI2 is ready as far as features are concerned, and is
just in need of more testing and documentation. I'd be happy to roll a
beta if someone could give me a few pointers on what how to get the
binaries and website in place (my jakarta foo is rusty)
Thats assuming that I ever
This is a call for a vote to release version 1.0 of Commons Launcher.
There are no unresolved issues, more info below.
your votes, please:
Release Commons-Launcher 1.0
-
[ ] +1 I support this release and will help
[ ] -1 I do not support this release, and
+1 of course
-- Dirk
Dirk Verbeeck wrote:
This is a call for a vote to release version 1.0 of Commons Launcher.
There are no unresolved issues, more info below.
your votes, please:
Release Commons-Launcher 1.0
-
[ ] +1 I support this release and will help
[
Hi,
Actually, I have an issue. It's not that big a deal, but... Can we call
this launcher 1.1? Tomcat has been shipping with launcher 1.0-dev for
more than a year now, making that the de-facto 1.0 release. I think
calling this 1.1 will make references easier in the future.
Yoav Shapira
Emmanuel Bourg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Pak, Young-rok wrote:
I want this feature in Commons-Configuration. I think it'll be easily add to
current version. If you agree to my proposal, I will be able to help you.
Hi, this would certainly be a useful addition to [configuration] but
it's too
Henning P. Schmiedehausen wrote:
The current 1.0-RC candidate is _NOT_ compatible to the various
pre-1.0 snapshots that are in wide use with e.g. Turbine.
If you drop it in, there will be complaints about the missing
getVector() methods from the Configuration interface.
I will rework the Turbine
+1 .. if I can vote despite of my tiny contribution :o)
On Mon, 2004-08-16 at 17:38, Dirk Verbeeck wrote:
This is a call for a vote to release version 1.0 of Commons Launcher.
There are no unresolved issues, more info below.
your votes, please:
Release Commons-Launcher 1.0
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30597.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30597.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30597.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30700.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
OK, 1.1 it is
-- Dirk
Shapira, Yoav wrote:
Hi,
Actually, I have an issue. It's not that big a deal, but... Can we call
this launcher 1.1? Tomcat has been shipping with launcher 1.0-dev for
more than a year now, making that the de-facto 1.0 release. I think
calling this 1.1 will make references
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30700.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
(i've not been too well recently but i'm better know and ready to push
the 1.6 release forward.)
the source for org.apache.commons.digester.rss has been moved into
examples (or somewhere like that). this means that these classes will
no longer be available as part of 1.6 release. some folks
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 09:44, robert burrell donkin wrote:
(i've not been too well recently but i'm better know and ready to push
the 1.6 release forward.)
Sorry to hear you haven't been well, but I'm glad to see you're back!
the source for org.apache.commons.digester.rss has been moved
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30702.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 16 Aug 2004, at 22:53, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 09:44, robert burrell donkin wrote:
snip
the source for org.apache.commons.digester.rss has been moved into
examples (or somewhere like that). this means that these classes will
no longer be available as part of 1.6 release.
henning 2004/08/16 15:16:33
Modified:configuration project.xml
configuration/src/java/org/apache/commons/configuration
AbstractConfiguration.java
CompositeConfiguration.java Configuration.java
henning 2004/08/16 15:25:43
Modified:commons-build/xdocs contributors.xml
Log:
added yours truly. ;-)
Revision ChangesPath
1.21 +1 -0 jakarta-commons/commons-build/xdocs/contributors.xml
Index: contributors.xml
burton 2004/08/16 16:17:45
Modified:feedparser/src/java/org/apache/commons/feedparser
AtomFeedParser.java
feedparser/src/java/org/apache/commons/feedparser/locate
FeedLocator.java
Hi
The purpose of the new class is to maintain a minimum number idle instances in a pool,
but grow as required up to a maximum number of active instances. The reason for
maintaining a minimum level of idle instances in a pool, is for efficiency. A call to
borrowObject() when there are no
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30705.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30705.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30705.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30705.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30705.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30705.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30705.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hey, is the Jira for Jelly 1.0b4 correct? Are there really only 6 issues to
be fixed in b4 or is Jira out of date?
Hans
There are lots of unscheduled issues that we need to look at before the release.
But my thoughts are that we cut another beta very soon.
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 21:55:02 -0400, Hans Gilde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, is the Jira for Jelly 1.0b4 correct? Are there really only 6 issues to
be fixed
--- Mark R. Diggory [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Well, I think should step back and ask a few design
questions concerning the objects that will use these
Sample/Population variances and that will assist us
in their own design.
1.) Is it the case that a covariance matrix could be
built off
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29550.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22193.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
52 matches
Mail list logo
