I've never understood removing the ability to use a standard XML
feature. I understand why it would be discouraged, but removing seems
wrong.
It'll be optional. The parser used without it, I'm told, is an order of
magnitude faster with it turned off. This becomes an issue when things
like
I may have been the one doing this.
It is related to the fact that, at least at the time, maven had no way
to specify to digester the system-ID of the parsed document which made
it that the parser was only able to resolve the entities wrt to the
working directory which broke in...
+1
Stefan
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Dear community,
I would like to see a 1.0 release candidate. The code is stable, junt
tests pass, document exists and the scripts are in good shape. Still
we should check that everything looks the way we expect before
releasing a final 1.0.
I already created the
Not to jump all over you, but Chain was there for a year, and I too used
it in prouduction. Alternative interfaces would mean redesign and maybe
even problems for current users, it is not backwards compatible.
A key to its power is the Map. I realy think that if you got a chance to
use it it
-0
I haven't been involved with this project at all,
however I haven't had any impression of there being an
active community working with the component. In fact,
I can't remember seeing any emails about [resources]
except for lots of failed gump reports (which
indicates a lack of maintainance to
Hi,
---
[ X ] +1 I support this release and am willing to help
[ ] +0 I support this release but am unable to help
[ ] -0 I do not support this release
[ ] -1 I do not support this release, and here are my reasons
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 8:09 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Promote Resources to Commons Proper
-0
I haven't been involved with this project at all,
however I haven't
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32347.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32347.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
cool, thanks Emmanuel.
Eric will this be the last step
for leaving sandbox?
Regards,
Matthias
-Original Message-
From: Emmanuel Venisse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 3:48 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; Henri Yandell
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Promote
Hi,
Perhaps you could clarify who the users of this are,
and why now is the time to promote it?
That was exactly my question too before voting ;) ?
Yoav
This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business
communication, and may contain information that is confidential,
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32347.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi everyone, thanks for your feedback. Sounds like my ideas for a different
Context are an enhancement request for Chain 1.1 or Chain 2.0.
As for the Context vs. Map issue, I think the approach I'll take in the
Morph framework is to have the DelegatingContext class implement Map. That
way,
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 18:20:33 -0800 (PST), Martin Cooper
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Resources project has been in the sandbox for quite some time, and is
essentially complete and almost ready for a release. Several projects are
using it already, and others are ready to pick it up once it is
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:09:41 + (GMT), Stephen Colebourne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-0
I haven't been involved with this project at all,
however I haven't had any impression of there being an
active community working with the component. In fact,
I can't remember seeing any emails about
On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 15:01:02 -0800 (PST), Martin Cooper
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe Chain is now sufficiently complete and stable to warrant an
official 1.0 release. There are no outstanding bug reports, and the
component is already in use in a number of projects.
The plan is to
Hi Martin,
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 20:39, Martin Cooper wrote:
This sounds like an enhancement request to me. Are you really
suggesting that Chain should not be released until your specific
enhancement is endorsed and incorporated into the component? I'm
afraid I, for one, can't sign up for
Sorry, one more comment for ServletWebContext, below...
- Original Message -
From: Don Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 11:11 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Chain 1.0
As for ServletWebContext, I see your point,
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:37:27 +1300, Simon Kitching
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Martin,
On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 20:39, Martin Cooper wrote:
This sounds like an enhancement request to me. Are you really
suggesting that Chain should not be released until your specific
enhancement is endorsed
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:09:41 + (GMT), Stephen Colebourne
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-0
I haven't been involved with this project at all,
however I haven't had any impression of there being an
active community working with the component. In fact,
I can't remember seeing any emails about
OK, I'm going to leave my vote as -0.
I do believe that there should be some signs of life in a component before
promotion, rather than seeing a vote thread appear from thin air.
I am not going to try to actively block the component however. Instead, I
trust that you and the other struts
On 18 Nov 2004, at 21:41, Brian Stansberry wrote:
custom LogFactory implementations are not very
useful at the moment and
so i'd be happy just to live with a note in the
documentation about
this limitation.
Sounds good. I'll put some thought to a good note,
although it might be a few days. Were
rdonkin 2004/11/22 14:50:07
Modified:logging/optional/src/test/org/apache/commons/logging
LogFactoryTest.java
Log:
Improved test cases for WeakHashMap classloading. Contributed by Brian
Stansberry.
Revision ChangesPath
1.3 +146 -96
rdonkin 2004/11/22 14:50:25
Added: logging/optional/src/test/org/apache/commons/logging
SubDeploymentClass.java
Log:
Improved test cases for WeakHashMap classloading. Contributed by Brian
Stansberry.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
rdonkin 2004/11/22 14:50:51
Added: logging/optional/src/test/org/apache/commons/logging
IFactoryCreator.java
Log:
Improved test cases for WeakHashMap classloading. Contributed by Brian
Stansberry.
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31286.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 19 Nov 2004, at 16:35, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
OK, do not know why but after a while I was just convinced: I will
start a vote for a release candicate :)
generally, the combination of a noisy, high volume list together with
committers who are involved in a variety of projects means that a
On 22 Nov 2004, at 05:38, Dion Gillard wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:00:47 +0800, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is there any reason not to modify the inheritence to remove the
entity?
Just the history of inheritance not quite working.
since the commons moved to maven for documentation
since the commons moved to maven for documentation (and many build),
there's been quite a history of pain associated with getting the
inheritance to work as we'd like.
Yep - a lot of work was needed in this through the 1.0 release candidates.
Is it ok to assume Maven 1.0+ for building?
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 07:30:26 +0800, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
since the commons moved to maven for documentation (and many build),
there's been quite a history of pain associated with getting the
inheritance to work as we'd like.
Yep - a lot of work was needed in this through
Is it ok to assume Maven 1.0+ for building?
My only addition would be a 1.0.x release only, no CVS builds.
Absolutely.
Sure, I'll try this on Jelly as soon as I get a chance, and look at the
broader
commons if everyone is happy with it.
That'd be great.
Ok, hopefully should be able
At 3:01 PM -0800 11/21/04, Martin Cooper wrote:
I believe Chain is now sufficiently complete and stable to warrant
an official 1.0 release. There are no outstanding bug reports, and
the component is already in use in a number of projects.
Just now, running maven java:install-snapshot from CVS
scolebourne2004/11/22 16:04:29
Modified:io/src/test/org/apache/commons/io FilenameUtilsTestCase.java
io/src/java/org/apache/commons/io FilenameUtils.java
Log:
Add methods to handle filename prefixes
Revision ChangesPath
1.20 +166 -6
From: Tim O'Brien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What happens to getExtension() when there is no . character?
Then there is no extension, returns .
what is there are multiple ., are you thinking name.substring(
name.lastIndexOf( . ) + 1 )?
Yes
What does getPrefix() return on Unix? Nothing?
absolute paths
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32350.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Martin Cooper wrote:
I believe Chain is now sufficiently complete and stable to warrant an
official 1.0 release. There are no outstanding bug reports, and the
component is already in use in a number of projects.
The plan is to release HEAD as Commons Chain 1.0 on completion of a
successful
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32350.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32350.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
The commons-jelly team is pleased to announce the commons-jelly 1.0-RC1
release!
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/jelly/
Jelly is a Java and XML based scripting engine. Jelly combines the best ideas
from JSTL, Velocity, DVSL, Ant and Cocoon all together in a simple yet
powerful scripting
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32350.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Paul,
For most tags, expressions are evaluated at runtime, but immediately before
the tag itself becomes aware of them. They're evaluated by the enclosing
TagScript (a Script that runs a Tag) immediately before the tag itself is
run. The tag just knows about the result of the expression, not the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31286.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
42 matches
Mail list logo
