[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-85?page=comments#action_57616
]
Paul Libbrecht commented on JELLY-85:
-
I have now committed modifications to TagScript and JellyContext to prevent any
caching outside of the JellyContext.
At least
Fine with that but I think it would be nice to have a test at history,
at least for one project...
paul
Le 13 janv. 05, à 19:11, Tim O'Brien a écrit :
Paul, I can add Jelly to this mix as well. Let me know if you want me
to and I'll put it on my stack. I can assure you that jelly made it
into
polx2005/01/14 02:05:01
Modified:jelly/jelly-tags/sql/src/java/org/apache/commons/jelly/tags/sql
SqlTagSupport.java
Log:
The body of the tags is now passed unescaped.
This is important for SQL strings using for example.
No test for this, positive or
skitching2005/01/14 03:04:31
Modified:digester/src/java/org/apache/commons/digester/xmlrules
digester-rules.dtd
Log:
* Use Parameter Entity to define list of rule elements instead of using
copy-and paste. This also fixed a few inconsistencies.
* Add
skitching2005/01/14 03:06:58
Modified:digester project.xml
Log:
Added Wendy Smoak as contributor (to xmlrules)
Revision ChangesPath
1.26 +4 -0 jakarta-commons/digester/project.xml
Index: project.xml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33001.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33001.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18942.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32891.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32925.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Paul,
Try this repository,
https://brahe.discursive.com/svn/commons-test/jakarta/commons/proper/jelly/
The same process was used to generate this that was used to generate the
structure of the ASF test repository exception this one has history. This was
an export from two weeks ago.
Tim
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33071.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Just a reminder that there are some files associated with an
enhancement that need to be committed
(http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33006)
sean
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33006.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I saw that, but I was waiting for more comments from others. Forgive me,
I'm still new to this whole chain thing. I'm still in the hey, look what I
can do with this.this is sooo cool!!! phase ;)
From everything I've read, a Command should have a single entry method
called execute. I
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-175?page=comments#action_57623 ]
dion gillard commented on JELLY-175:
I'm still unsure if we can *use* LGPL binaries in ASF code. Note: we wont be
distributing it.
patch for jelly-tags-interaction
Our list of changes since the initial release has grown quite long and
it contains some nice new features like reloading facilities or optional
configurations. So I think this would justify a 1.1 release.
In bugzilla ATM there are only enhancement requests, no evil bug
reports. Emmanuel, is
I'm trying to convert a String into a Timestamp using:
ConvertUtils.register(new SqlTimestampConverter(), Timestamp.class);
SqlTimestampConverter converter = new SqlTimestampConverter();
try {
timestamp = (Timestamp)ConvertUtils.convert(fullStringTimestamp,
Timestamp.class);
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33101.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I plead guilty to being lukewarm (is lukecold a word? :-) about
DispatchChain and friends being part of the standard chain package --
I'd like to spend some time tomorrow (Saturday) looking at the code
and seeing if I buy in to Sean's use cases.
Craig
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:20:44 -0500, James
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33102.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
ozeigermann2005/01/14 10:38:03
Added: transaction/xdocs/locks deadlock.sxd
Log:
Added OpenOffice source of the deadlock pngs
Revision ChangesPath
1.1 jakarta-commons/transaction/xdocs/locks/deadlock.sxd
Binary file
--
Use Rojo (RSS/Atom aggregator). Visit http://rojo.com. Ask me for an
invite! Also see irc.freenode.net #rojo if you want to chat.
Rojo is Hiring! - http://www.rojonetworks.com/JobsAtRojo.html
If you're interested in RSS, Weblogs, Social Networking, etc... then you
should work for Rojo! If
burton 2005/01/14 11:06:26
Modified:feedparser/src/java/org/apache/commons/feedparser
AtomFeedParser.java
Log:
never called finished...
Revision ChangesPath
1.15 +3 -1
Daniel Massie wrote:
Thanks for the reply :)
I've been playing around with it this afternoon, and found it pretty easy
to use. One thing that I think may be broken just now is the
AtomFeedParser, it doesn't call listener.finished() at the end of its
parse method.
Crap... thats not good...
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18942.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18942.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
olegk 2005/01/14 11:40:39
Modified:httpclient/src/java/org/apache/commons/httpclient
HttpMethodDirector.java
httpclient/src/test/org/apache/commons/httpclient
TestRedirects.java
Added:
I would start by saying that you can make the case for DispatchChain
more than you can for DispatchCommand or LookupDispatchCommand both of
which are now in there.
Joe should probably weigh in on this because of his initial
contribution of DispatchCommand. I added LookupDispatchCommand to
round
At 9:20 AM -0800 1/14/05, Craig McClanahan wrote:
I plead guilty to being lukewarm (is lukecold a word? :-) about
DispatchChain and friends being part of the standard chain package --
I'd like to spend some time tomorrow (Saturday) looking at the code
and seeing if I buy in to Sean's use cases.
My original post to bugzilla didn't generate any responses. I figured
once I wrote something and started pestering for a commit that would
get the discussion going ;-)
I will await your guys feedback once you've had a chance to think
about use cases, etc.
Let me know if you have any questions.
olegk 2005/01/14 13:16:40
Modified:httpclient/src/java/org/apache/commons/httpclient
HostConfiguration.java HttpConnection.java
HttpHost.java HttpMethodBase.java ProxyHost.java
olegk 2005/01/14 13:28:24
Modified:httpclient release_notes.txt
Log:
PR #33021
Revision ChangesPath
1.48 +5 -1 jakarta-commons/httpclient/release_notes.txt
Index: release_notes.txt
===
olegk 2005/01/14 13:31:00
Modified:httpclient/src/java/org/apache/commons/httpclient
HttpConnection.java
Log:
My bad
Revision ChangesPath
1.107 +6 -6
jakarta-commons/httpclient/src/java/org/apache/commons/httpclient/HttpConnection.java
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33108.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-175?page=comments#action_57644 ]
Paul Libbrecht commented on JELLY-175:
--
I think the situation sounds pretty delicate and that currently linking to LGPL
is not a good idea. See:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33109.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33109.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33109.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33109.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-email has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33001.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33001.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
43 matches
Mail list logo
