[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-201?page=history ]
Nacho G. Mac Dowell updated JELLY-201:
--
Attachment: NotAvailableTag.patch
Updated AvailableTag and created NotAvailableTag
NotAvailableTag
---
Key: JELLY-201
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33554.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 16:44 -0700, Travis Stevens wrote:
I just added a Bugzilla entry which includes a patch. What do I need to
do to persuade someone to look at the bug and apply the patch?
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33574
Just creating the bugzilla entry sends
NotAvailableTag
---
Key: JELLY-201
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-201
Project: jelly
Type: Improvement
Components: taglib.util
Reporter: Nacho G. Mac Dowell
It would be useful to have a NotAvailableTag. Even though (for
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-201?page=history ]
Nacho G. Mac Dowell updated JELLY-201:
--
Attachment: UtilTagLibrary.patch
Included NotAvailableTag in UtilTagLibrary for testing purposes
NotAvailableTag
---
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33580.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-201?page=history ]
Nacho G. Mac Dowell updated JELLY-201:
--
Attachment: NotAvailableTag.patch
Previous NotAvailableTag patch doesn't work... Too early in the morning...
The new patch now includes
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-201?page=history ]
Nacho G. Mac Dowell updated JELLY-201:
--
Attachment: suite.jelly.patch
Test cases for NotAvailableTag.
NotAvailableTag
---
Key: JELLY-201
URL:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-201?page=comments#action_59192 ]
Nacho G. Mac Dowell commented on JELLY-201:
---
Only attachments 2 and 4 should be used. I don't know why the order went weird
as it should be attachments 3 and 4...
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33574.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Date: 2005-02-15T00:48:06
Editor: SimonKitching
Wiki: Jakarta Commons Wiki
Page: Logging/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Logging/FrequentlyAskedQuestions
no comment
Change Log:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33561.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33550.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33581.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33581.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33581.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-201?page=comments#action_59193 ]
Paul Libbrecht commented on JELLY-201:
--
Do I understand that you are wishing a negative version of ant:available ?
Why not in ant taglib ? Or... even... in ant itself ?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33561.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20903.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi everybody and especially functor folks.
I've a question about functor status.
I know it's still in sandbox, but how far is project from going out of
sandbox ?
I know too API can still change, but how functor folks would qualify project
statibility ?
There is a futur promotion vote planified ?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33581.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33580.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-201?page=comments#action_59199 ]
Nacho G. Mac Dowell commented on JELLY-201:
---
Hi, what I was looking for is the negative version of util:available. If
ant:available exists, maybe util:available is
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:22:45 +1300, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 16:44 -0700, Travis Stevens wrote:
I just added a Bugzilla entry which includes a patch. What do I need to
do to persuade someone to look at the bug and apply the patch?
Author: dflorey
Date: Tue Feb 15 06:38:33 2005
New Revision: 153937
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153937
Log:
Added JUnit-Test infrastructure
Modified:
jakarta/commons/sandbox/i18n/trunk/project.properties
jakarta/commons/sandbox/i18n/trunk/project.xml
Modified:
Hi Daniel,
Can I help?
Woody
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Woody,
I'm currently trying to improve the maven environment, so that releases and
tests can easily be done.
My goal is to complete the component in the actual state in order to build a
usable release as soon as possible.
I've already had a look at your proposed changes. I'd like to include
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33550.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Date: 2005-02-15T08:13:02
Editor: RajThangaraj
Wiki: Jakarta Commons Wiki
Page: Transaction
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Transaction
Name of the output file in file transaction
New Page:
I wrote the following code to create temp.txt in the stored directory
But
Also, providing a unit test patch with a test is, IMHO, essential. I
like to apply the unit test patch, watch the test fail, apply the patch,
watch the test pass.
Cheers,
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2005 5:26 AM
To:
I've been working with the Eclipse SDK quite a bit lately, Eclipse has a
coding standard where they divide the API up into external and
internal API's. Internal API's are subject to change, while External
API's are more stable and regulated. The division of these API's is usually:
External
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33591.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33591.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I've been working with the Eclipse SDK quite a bit lately, Eclipse has a
coding standard where they divide the API up into external and
internal API's. Internal API's are subject to change, while External
API's are more stable and regulated. The division of these API's is usually:
External API:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33167.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17682.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Eclipse also has a special way of sharing classes with other plugins. You
can prevent outside plugins from using internal packages by tweaking the
export definition in plugin.xml:
runtime
library name=something.jar
export name=*/
/library
/runtime
That seems to be the primary benefit to
On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 08:22, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 16:44 -0700, Travis Stevens wrote:
I just added a Bugzilla entry which includes a patch. What do I need to
do to persuade someone to look at the bug and apply the patch?
Author: burton
Date: Tue Feb 15 14:12:44 2005
New Revision: 153966
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153966
Log:
use a smarter cache policy for DNS requests
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/feedparser/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/feedparser/network/NetworkException.java
Author: burton
Date: Tue Feb 15 14:22:32 2005
New Revision: 153967
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153967
Log:
now extending commons proper projects
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/feedparser/trunk/project.xml
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/feedparser/trunk/project.xml
I'm trying to push out a new version of the FeedParser site at
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/feedparser/
Instead of the commons/sandbox URL.
But I get this error:
site:sshdeploy:
[echo]
siteAddress = jakarta.apache.org
siteDirectory = /www/jakarta.apache.org/commons
Kevin A. Burton wrote:
I'm trying to push out a new version of the FeedParser site at
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/feedparser/
Instead of the commons/sandbox URL.
Oh... also... the above URL still 404s... :-/
I guess I'm doing something wrong ...
Kevin
--
Use Rojo (RSS/Atom aggregator).
The tar uploaded is only 45 bits long. Did you run site before
site:sshdeploy?
I think the siteDirectory should be
/www/jakarta.apache.org/commons/feedparser, not just /commons - that
will stop the attempt to chmod dbcp which must have bad group write
permissions.
- Brett
Kevin A. Burton
Crap...
I just shot myself in the foot. Anyone care to help?
I pushed to the wrong directory and now
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/
is the feedparser documentation.
Can anyone help me regen it?
Maven is confusing...
siteAddress = jakarta.apache.org
siteDirectory =
Kevin A. Burton wrote:
Crap...
I just shot myself in the foot. Anyone care to help?
I pushed to the wrong directory and now
More on this subject btw:
the siteDirectory in commons-build is
/www/jakarta.apache.org/commons
Which is the worst setting right? I think the problem is that I
extended
Kevin A. Burton wrote:
Kevin A. Burton wrote:
Crap...
I just shot myself in the foot. Anyone care to help?
I pushed to the wrong directory and now
More on this subject btw:
the siteDirectory in commons-build is
/www/jakarta.apache.org/commons
Which is the worst setting right?
Brett Porter wrote:
Yes, especially if it differs from the sandbox. I'll fix it. I did point
this out in my other email before this happened...
The sandbox is like that too, and it is necessary to build the base part
of the site, so I won't change it.
It's not wise to inherit the same files
Brett Porter wrote:
I'd suggest maven clean xdoc site:sshdeploy for now - it'll be much
faster and just get the essentials up there.
Sites up and working... I'll rework FeedParser to not extend the
commons-build and add all the essentials.
Sorry for the glitch guys!
Kevin
--
Use Rojo
http://www.osnews.com/files/WinXP-security-guide.pdf
.V
--
Forums, Boards, Blogs and News in RiA http://www.boardVU.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I just realized that LookupCommand returns the return value of
whatever command it looks up and executes. This was
counter-intuitive to what I was trying to achieve, and, I would
argue, limited if not broken.
public boolean execute(Context context) throws Exception {
Command
Hello Daniel,
Yup, the ConfigManager not prove to be very usefull. This class is
increasing the coupling level to give me a few features set (the con
figuration features itself) and gave me much more code to delegate ...
But you don't think necessary some code to configure the behaviours of
this
oops :-[
Wrong link, this is it:
http://www.szegedi.org/articles/memleak.html
It talks about Commons logging, since i'ts open season.
.V
http://www.boardVU.com
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Author: skitching
Date: Tue Feb 15 20:51:55 2005
New Revision: 153990
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153990
Log:
Support target offset feature of CallMethodRule in xmlrules.
Patch by Wendy Smoak (with minor alterations). See bugzilla #33550.
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33550.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 22:50:51 -0600, Vic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oops :-[
Wrong link, this is it:
http://www.szegedi.org/articles/memleak.html
It talks about Commons logging, since i'ts open season.
.V
There's lots of ways to shoot yourself in the foot the same way ...
you don't need JCL
Author: epugh
Date: Tue Feb 15 21:22:10 2005
New Revision: 153994
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=153994
Log:
Fix email address. Test commit privileges under SVN
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/email/trunk/project.xml
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/email/trunk/project.xml
Craig McClanahan wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 22:50:51 -0600, Vic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
oops :-[
Wrong link, this is it:
http://www.szegedi.org/articles/memleak.html
It talks about Commons logging, since i'ts open season.
.V
There's lots of ways to shoot yourself in the foot the same way
Date: 2005-02-15T23:06:14
Editor: KevinBurton
Wiki: Jakarta Commons Wiki
Page: TheSandbox
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TheSandbox
no comment
Change Log:
--
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
*
Maybe this is a stupid question but spending the last 30 minutes I can't
figure out how to import into SVN.
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/UsingSVN
Doesn't document it... and all I can figure out from the above and the
dox is that the import command would be:
svn import
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
svn import
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/sandbox/benchmark/trunk
from inside the directory you have your code locally
Later you need to go to the sandbox checkout of trunks-sandbox and do
svn propedit svn:externals .
and add your
Brett Porter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
svn import
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jakarta/commons/sandbox/benchmark/trunk
from inside the directory you have your code locally
Later you need to go to the sandbox checkout of trunks-sandbox and do
svn propedit
Anyway... I called my newborn connection pool BDCP (basic database
connection pool).
Its about 1/5 the size of DBCP and a LOT easier to maintain.
I built my own connection pool for similar but less informed reasons.
I found DBCP to be simply unworkable for some reason. I may have been
at
62 matches
Mail list logo
