Daniel, have you had time to study the unit tests and refactoring proposal
I sent you?
From what I can tell, nothing has been checked in. Do you want me to make
modifications?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34701.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34701.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34701.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34701.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34701.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34702.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34702.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34702.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34702.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34702.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34702.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34701.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34702.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-xml has an issue affecting its community integration.
This
On Sun, 2005-05-01 at 11:57 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Sat, 2005-04-30 at 00:35 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
snip
Analysis of the effectiveness of static in the demonstration scenarios:
1-4: static fails, but that's expected. When using the static approach,
you simply
Author: ebourg
Date: Mon May 2 03:55:17 2005
New Revision: 165618
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165618view=rev
Log:
Removed the dependency on Digester for XMLPropertiesConfiguration (contributed
by Alistair Young)
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34490.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello:
I hate to put a damper on things so late in the game but Clover reports
that we have 0% code coverage for three new 2.1 classes
(MappedMessageFormat, StrBuilder, StrTokenizer.StringMatcher) in the new
to 2.1 package:
http://people.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1/docs/clover/org
Hello:
The Javadoc report:
http://people.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1/docs/javadoc-wa
rnings-report.html
is nonsensical. Could this be a Maven plug-in bug?
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 01, 2005 3:12 PM
To:
Yeah, that is what happens when there are no warnings to report. Though I
don't think it has been reported yet, I'd say it could be considered a bug
in the Maven plug-in. And since I wrote the plug-in, I'll take full
responsibility :)
On 5/2/05, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello:
Author: ggregory
Date: Mon May 2 11:31:49 2005
New Revision: 165657
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165657view=rev
Log:
Fix 120-length warnings reported for 2.1-RC4 here:
http://people.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1/docs/checkstyle-report.html
Modified:
Author: rwinston
Date: Mon May 2 11:57:07 2005
New Revision: 165662
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165662view=rev
Log:
Update version
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/discovery/trunk/project.xml
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/discovery/trunk/project.xml
URL:
Here's step 1: A release candidate...
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-discovery-0.3.jar
I will initiate a vote based on this RC, if it is acceptable.
Regards
Rory
Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org wrote:
we are now three :)
by the ancient apache
Here's step 1: A release candidate...
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-discovery-0.3.jar
I will initiate a vote based on this RC, if it is acceptable.
Regards
Rory
Jakarta Commons Developers List commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org wrote:
we are now three :)
by the ancient apache
+1 from me.
-- dims
On 5/2/05, Rory Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's step 1: A release candidate...
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-discovery-0.3.jar
I will initiate a vote based on this RC, if it is acceptable.
Regards
Rory
Jakarta Commons Developers List
I have placed an RC of Commons-Discovery here:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-discovery-0.3.jar
This should fix some long-standing issues.
Please vote to release (or not). I'm starting with my:
+1
_
Sign up for eircom
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/discovery/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/discovery/tools/PropertiesHolder.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta/commons/proper/discovery/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/discovery/tools/PropertiesHolder.java?rev=165666r1=165665r2=165666view=diff
+1 from me.
On 5/2/05, Rory Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have placed an RC of Commons-Discovery here:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-discovery-0.3.jar
This should fix some long-standing issues.
Please vote to release (or not). I'm starting with my:
+1
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29643.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: rwinston
Date: Mon May 2 12:47:31 2005
New Revision: 165668
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165668view=rev
Log:
Ignore SecurityExceptions (PR 29643)
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/discovery/trunk/maven.xml
Author: olegk
Date: Mon May 2 12:50:15 2005
New Revision: 165669
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165669view=rev
Log:
PR #34583 (DateUtil.formatDate() uses default timezone instead of GMT)
Contributed by Fred Bierhaus fred.bierhaus at vodafone.com
Reviewed by Michael Becke, Ortwin Glck
Author: olegk
Date: Mon May 2 12:52:34 2005
New Revision: 165670
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165670view=rev
Log:
PR #34583
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/release_notes.txt
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/release_notes.txt
URL:
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/net/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/net/nntp/Article.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta/commons/proper/net/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/net/nntp/Article.java?rev=165675r1=165674r2=165675view=diff
Author: rwinston
Date: Mon May 2 13:10:40 2005
New Revision: 165676
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165676view=rev
Log:
Update copyright dates
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/net/trunk/project.xml
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/net/trunk/project.xml
URL:
Steven:
Sorry for not catching this sooner since I was the last committer on
CharEncoding.java. I've fixed the warnings in that file described here:
http://people.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1/docs/checkstyle
-report.html#org/apache/commons/lang/CharEncoding.java
I've also fixed
I have cut a RC of Commons-Net 1.4.0. If anyone has no objections, I would like
to cut a release in the next couple of weeks. The main thrust behind this
release is the FTPClientConfig infractructure added by Steve. I honestly
believe that this addition (plus an extra parser for MVS FTP
Author: rwinston
Date: Mon May 2 14:00:40 2005
New Revision: 165685
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165685view=rev
Log:
Comment out available() check
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/net/trunk/project.properties
Author: rwinston
Date: Mon May 2 14:02:14 2005
New Revision: 165686
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165686view=rev
Log:
Comment out available() check
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/net/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/net/telnet/TelnetClientTest.java
Modified:
Author: ggregory
Date: Mon May 2 14:06:38 2005
New Revision: 165687
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165687view=rev
Log:
Javadoc nit.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/text/StrTokenizer.java
Modified:
When I was cutting the RC for Commons::Net, the TelnetClientTest repeatedly
failed. I tracked this down to the line:
if(is1.available() == 6)
The available() method continually returned 0. When I commented out the
available() check, the test passed as expected. I compiled with Java 5.
The
Author: ggregory
Date: Mon May 2 14:16:58 2005
New Revision: 165694
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165694view=rev
Log:
Replace the Javadoc pattern A Matcher which matches the XXX character. with
Matches the XXX character.. (A matcher matches of course ;-) Use the active
voice or
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34715.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34715.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello:
Clover is pretty but what a pain to set up WRT the license file. I've
looked around and found a ref to getting the license file from the SVN
committers repository, which I cannot locate, can someone point me to a
URL please? I am a committer so I should be able to get it...
Thanks,
Gary
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34717.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34717.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: ggregory
Date: Mon May 2 15:42:45 2005
New Revision: 165706
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165706view=rev
Log:
@version $Id: $
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/codec/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/codec/binary/BinaryCodec.java
Modified:
Author: ggregory
Date: Mon May 2 15:46:07 2005
New Revision: 165708
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165708view=rev
Log:
Normalize @author and @version tag order and add missing @version tags.
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34717.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Gary,
Take a look at the developer's guide in the RC. I added some info on how to
set up the Clover license since I just went through this myself. The
instructions probably aren't complete, but hopefully will be enough to get
you running.
On 5/2/05, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: ggregory
Date: Mon May 2 15:55:31 2005
New Revision: 165710
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=165710view=rev
Log:
A good start for: [Bug 34715][lang] unit test for
org.apache.commons.lang.text.StrBuilder. From [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Added:
Author: ggregory
Date: Mon May 2 16:04:47 2005
New Revision: 166042
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=166042view=rev
Log:
[Bug 34715][lang] unit test for org.apache.commons.lang.text.StrBuilder.
Modified:
Author: ggregory
Date: Mon May 2 16:05:47 2005
New Revision: 166153
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=166153view=rev
Log:
Text test suite was not being invoked.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/build.xml
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/build.xml
URL:
Hello All:
I see that the text package is included in RC4 but that it is not tested
from build.xml. I've fixed that part but I also notice that the new txt
package in not mentioned in RELEASE-NOTES.txt. I also recall some
discussions a while back about text not being fully baked. Is the
inclusion
Steven:
Yes, I've found the guide [1] with the note: Obtain the license file
from the committers svn repository (clover.license)
Where do I go from pointing TortoiseSVN to:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/
?
Thanks,
Gary
[1]
Gotcha. Sorry the write-up wasn't more verbose. I threw that in there
without stopping to think about not everyone knowing what it meant. Try
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/
On 5/2/05, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steven:
Yes, I've found the guide [1] with the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34717.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I was able to checkout from the URL, thanks. Worth a mention in the
dev-guide?
Gary
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 4:30 PM
To: Gary Gregory
Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [lang] New VOTE on lang
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34715.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34715.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Thank you for the code Alistair, I tweaked it a bit and commited it in
SVN. Regarding the includes I'm no longer convinced we should implement
it in XMLPropertiesConfiguration as well. I feel we'd better rely on
CompositeConfiguration/ConfigurationFactory to build a configuration
from several
Rory Winston wrote:
When I was cutting the RC for Commons::Net, the TelnetClientTest repeatedly
failed. I tracked this down to the line:
if(is1.available() == 6)
The available() method continually returned 0. When I commented out the available() check, the test passed as expected. I compiled with
Definitely should be in the dev guide. I'll add it.
On 5/2/05, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was able to checkout from the URL, thanks. Worth a mention in the
dev-guide?
Gary
--
*From:* Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:*
No problem. Glad you checked it before we released.
On 5/2/05, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steven:
Sorry for not catching this sooner since I was the last committer on
CharEncoding.java. I've fixed the warnings in that file described here:
Shouldn't a 'release' be 1.0?
On 5/3/05, Rory Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have placed an RC of Commons-Discovery here:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-discovery-0.3.jar
This should fix some long-standing issues.
Please vote to release (or not). I'm starting with my:
I assume this is built from the code in svn head (trunk) now?
Just my HO, but I think its better to vote on code than binaries.
Phil
On 5/2/05, Rory Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have placed an RC of Commons-Discovery here:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-discovery-0.3.jar
I'm having hanging problems running the functional tests under 1.5, but
1.4.2 works ok. Anyone else seeing this running maven test:functional?
Rory Winston wrote:
I have cut a RC of Commons-Net 1.4.0. If anyone has no objections, I would like
to cut a release in the next couple of weeks. The
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki
for change notification.
The following page has been changed by SimonKitching:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/FrontPage
The comment on the change is:
Minor link fixes
69 matches
Mail list logo
