[was Re: [i18n PATCH] Adding provider qualifying]
At 2005-05-19 16:41, you wrote:
But, to be honest, I'm a bit disappointed at how this project is being
developed. I feel that i18n would benefit tremendously by reusing instead
of reinventing.
Since Commons Resources and i18n seems to basically
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I _want_ en/decryption support as well. Also, I see
no reason not to provide a backing library that calls
a gpg executable.
Or any other OpenPGP compatible suite, right.
This is GPL-kosher AFAIK (right?).
Executing as an external
Hi,
Section #15 of the release page has me puzzled:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/release.html
What's the point of the first update links bits, and how does this
interact with how maven generates the component's website?
Thanks,
Simon
Hello!
After one week here is the positive result of the voting:
Move out of sandbox:
+1 Simon Kitching
+1 Stephen Colebourne
+1 Dion Gillard
+0 Mark Diggory
+0 Phil Steitz
+1 Mario Ivankovits
User votes:
+1 Filip
Cut Release 1.0:
+0 Stephen Colebourne
+1 Dion
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32801.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
All,
The problem with generating the javadocs is indeed a bug in the maven
javadoc plugin:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=turbine-maven-userm=111654720406621w=2 and
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MPJAVADOC-59
I'll pull down the fix this weekend and generate a new release candidate.
Gary, I
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32380.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
While I've used an checkPreconditions type approach in some of my
Command implementations, I'm not sure I feel like I've got anything
I'd want to codify as best practices in formal interfaces in
commons-chain.
However, when you suggest annotations, I think that sounds pretty
interesting and
At 03:05 5/19/2005, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 17:58 +0200, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
Robert et al.,
Your test cases are self-describing and easy to follow. One can hardly
appreciate the work gone into putting in place something as delicate
and tedious as these test cases. Well done!
Hi,
a while ago there was a discussion about adding support for variable
substitution/interpolation to lang. IIRC Simon Kitching proposed to
extract the interpolation engine of digester. I'd like to know the
current state of this project. Has there already been some work in this
direction?
Re: [Fwd: [commons-email] RFC about improving the code ...FYI...This was
hung in moderation.
--
James Mitchell
Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist
Consulting / Mentoring / Freelance
EdgeTech, Inc.
http://www.edgetechservices.net/
678.910.8017
AIM: jmitchtx
Yahoo: jmitchtx
MSN: [EMAIL
Sorry not to be around so much any more. I got laid off and had to find a
new job.
I'm so sorry to say that my memory leak patch has a big flaw in it. It
should not have caused the tag to be improperly reused.
I'm happy to say that I have a fix (replacement), which is attached. This
patch should
Ok, things have moved on somewhat from when I did my patch from CSV, and my
SVN stuff isn't working right. So, that last parch was from the really old
CVS.
-Original Message-
From: Hans Gilde [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 1:48 AM
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers
13 matches
Mail list logo
