--- Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 20:56 -0700, Brian Stansberry
wrote:
--- Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd be happy with including this approach in the
next release, removing
the redundant isXYZAvailable methods and calling
the
next
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34368.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35017.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35017.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35017.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35017.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34959.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34919.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34918.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Added:
jakarta/commons/proper/logging/branches/simon-1.1/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/NoOpLogger.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta/commons/proper/logging/branches/simon-1.1/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/impl/NoOpLogger.java?rev=177949view=auto
Author: skitching
Date: Mon May 23 04:01:16 2005
New Revision: 177951
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=177951view=rev
Log:
general info.
Added:
jakarta/commons/proper/logging/branches/simon-1.1/README.txt (with props)
Added:
Hi,
As you can see I've committed some code in branches/simon-1.1
I'm not quite ready to swear that it works properly, but it was
definitely time to put it somewhere safe before I lost it :-).
And it shows what *might* be a way to effectively merge SLF4J/JCL
concepts.
But I hope it doesn't
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33786.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Adding a wrapper makes total sense. That way, any RandomGenerator (ours or
someone elses) implementation can be used where Random objects are required.
Likewise, a RandomGenerator that wraps a Random would be a good addition.
Then any Random extension can be used inside commons-math. With
Most projects are very happy to have more interest! That is part of
the reason they are in sandbox, is to build up a group of interested
developers...!
On May 17, 2005, at 8:01 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote:
The convention in the sandbox (and in Commons Proper for that matter)
are to
Dear Jakarta Commons developers,
We are pleased to announce that we have enhanced the Commons-Collections
with Java 1.5 generics support! We have the results hosted on SourceForge:
http://collections.sf.net
We have done our utmost to maintain the exact same functionality as
Collections 3.1.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35028.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi!
I wanted to start the move of VFS from sandbox to proper and wasnt aware
that these questions are not solved yet.
The main question that needs resolving is:
* should the code be MOVED from sandbox to proper, or COPIED?
I would like to tag the current sandbox to /tags/sandbox ...
I
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki
for change notification.
The following page has been changed by MattHall:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Collections
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki
for change notification.
The following page has been changed by MattHall:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Collections_Questions
Hello:
I cannot seem to build (from
http://people.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1/distributions/c
ommons-lang-2.1-RC6-src.zip) with Sun Java 1.2.2_017 and Ant 1.6.4. It
appears to just hang:
C:\temp\commons-lang-2.1-RC6ant clean dist-build-2.1
Buildfile: build.xml
A nonfatal internal
Hello:
RELEASE-NOTES.txt is missing from:
http://people.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1/distributions/c
ommons-lang-2.1-RC6-src.zip
Unzipping the above and running:
ant clean dist-build-2.1
gives the error:
Buildfile: build.xml
clean:
[delete] Deleting directory
That seems odd since I used maven to gen the sources. Will take a look.
Looks like your earlier problem is fixed.
On 5/23/05, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello:
RELEASE-NOTES.txt is missing from:
http://people.apache.org/~stevencaswell/commons-lang-2.1/distributions/c
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34942.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Sorry, I should have been clearer. If by earlier problem you mean the
hanging 1.2.2 build, it is not solved. The build below with the missing
RELEASE-NOTES.txt was run with Sun Java 1.4.2_08.
Gary
From: Steven Caswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
No, my mistake, I should have looked closer. There is a reference to that
version in the javadoc generation output. So I should ask, any progress on
the 1.2.2 issue? I'm trying to imagine how the source would affect that and
I can't see how it would, at least not at the level you are seeing the
As another data point, building with Java 1.3.1_14 ends with the same
error below as with 1.4.2_08:
BUILD FAILED
C:\temp\commons-lang-2.1-RC6\build.xml:120: The following error occurred
while executing this line:
C:\temp\commons-lang-2.1-RC6\build.xml:115: Warning: Could not find file
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 11:13 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 21:05 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
however, having wasted too many hours trying to arguing about
performance, if i get a minute, i'll go through and put checks around
calls just to stop any arguments
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 15:59 -0700, Brian Stansberry wrote:
--- robert burrell donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 01:06 +1200, Simon Kitching
wrote:
Hi All,
I've been working for quite a while now to try to
figure out why users
of JCL have been getting the
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 13:54 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
Hi,
=
I would like to propose the following for jcl 1.0.5:
(a)
That we build diagnostic output into LogFactory/LogFactoryImpl which
users can turn on via a system property. NB: I'm about 80% done with the
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 11:24 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 21:01 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 10:43 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
protected boolean isJdk13LumberjackAvailable() {
+// note: the algorithm here
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 16:29 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 20:56 -0700, Brian Stansberry wrote:
--- Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd be happy with including this approach in the
next release, removing
the redundant isXYZAvailable methods and calling the
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 23:07 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
snip
But I hope it doesn't distract people from getting out a less ambitious
JCL 1.0.5 (or 1.1 if we decide to call it that, in which case I'll have
to rename my branch :-).
hehehe
that's why i choose names without numbers :)
I'm
All,
Gary ran across something that I hadn't run across due to how I was creating
the various distributions, and I'd like to ask for a concensus on how to
handle this. Here is the scenario:
1. Download the source distribution (i.e., commons-lang-2.1-whatever.zip)
2. Attempt to build a binary
Gary,
I suspect building against 1.4.2 and running against 1.2.2 will not work due
to changes in the Java API. The RC binary distribution is in fact build with
1.2.2, so it may be sufficient just to run the downloaded RC6 against your
1.2.2 without building from scratch.
On 5/23/05, Gary
Actually, never mind. I should have looked at the maven.xml first. We are in
fact trying to copy the release notes file, but the maven.xml has
RELEASE-NOTES.html and the file is RELEASE-NOTES.txt. I'll make the fix.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All,
I have replaced the RC6 source distributions with new ones containing the
RELEASE-NOTES.txt file. Thanks to Gary for finding the omission.
On 5/23/05, Steven Caswell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gary,
I suspect building against 1.4.2 and running against 1.2.2 will not work
due to
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 20:58 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-22 at 15:59 -0700, Brian Stansberry wrote:
One unsatisfactory aspect is that instead of throwing
an exception with a nice message and stack trace,
logging would mysteriously be done using an unexpected
logging
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 21:27 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
(b)
That in addition to commons-logging.jar we distribute a
commons-logging-adapters.jar which contains the entire contents of the
impl subdirectory, ie all the logging adapters and the concrete
LogFactory subclasses, but
On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 22:34 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
* Robert, are you ok with ripping out the isXYZAvailable
methods and calling the next release 1.1?
breaking binary compatibility anywhere in JCL would be a very, very big
deal. JCL is used even more widely than
Author: stevencaswell
Date: Mon May 23 16:24:13 2005
New Revision: 178055
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=178055view=rev
Log:
changed preparing source distribution to copy RELEASE-NOTES.txt instead of
RELEASE-NOTES.html
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/maven.xml
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34792.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: skitching
Date: Mon May 23 19:41:04 2005
New Revision: 178062
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=178062view=rev
Log:
Initial testcase stuff.
Added:
jakarta/commons/proper/logging/branches/simon-1.1/src/test/org/apache/commons/logging/BasicTestCase.java
(with props)
Author: skitching
Date: Mon May 23 19:43:20 2005
New Revision: 178063
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=178063view=rev
Log:
General updates.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/logging/branches/simon-1.1/README.txt
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/branches/simon-1.1/README.txt
Author: skitching
Date: Mon May 23 19:46:49 2005
New Revision: 178064
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=178064view=rev
Log:
factory/logger combination for use in unit tests.
Added:
Author: skitching
Date: Mon May 23 19:48:31 2005
New Revision: 178065
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=178065view=rev
Log:
rename LogFactory method getInstance to getFactory
Modified:
Author: skitching
Date: Mon May 23 19:49:54 2005
New Revision: 178066
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=178066view=rev
Log:
Added missing copyright/license info.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/logging/branches/simon-1.1/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/Factory.java
Modified:
Author: skitching
Date: Mon May 23 19:50:49 2005
New Revision: 178067
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=178067view=rev
Log:
Significant changes. This file still needs *major* work though.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/logging/branches/simon-1.1/build.xml
Modified:
Cleaning out some old files from a grad class. I have one- and
two-dimensional FFT code in C, ported to Java. It's from the
Numerical Recipes book so it's limited to 2^n.
It needs unit tests and test cases.
FFT begs the question of generalizing to Discrete Wavelet
transformations (DWT).
I have some interfaces and classes that are a start on modeling
dynamic systems, from a chaos theory class. The user has to
implement two (nearly) placeholder interfaces, StateVector and
Dynamics, and this package defines and implements an Integrator
and binds everything together as a Model.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34690.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi, Bear,
Thanks for your contributionary sentiment. Unfortunately, we cannot accept
code based on _Numerical Recipes_, given their license.
--- Bear Giles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cleaning out some old files from a grad class. I have one- and
two-dimensional FFT code in C, ported to Java.
Hi Rory,
It looks like the dicovery 0.3 release process has stalled. Are you
intending to push on with this in the near future? If so, is there
anything I can help with?
If you don't currently have the time to finish the release process, but
still think a 0.3 release is a good idea then please
Author: psteitz
Date: Mon May 23 22:06:04 2005
New Revision: 178077
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=178077view=rev
Log:
Updated sample deployment repository settings.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/commons-build/trunk/project.properties.sample
Modified:
Author: psteitz
Date: Mon May 23 22:34:18 2005
New Revision: 178079
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=178079view=rev
Log:
Made jar deployment location explicit, added maven jar deploy instructions.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/commons-build/trunk/xdocs/releases/release.xml
Hi Phil,
On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 05:06 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-
-
##
-# Apache Central Repository
+# Deployment Repository Settings
+#
+# 'apache' is the mirrored public release repository
+# 'apachecvs' is the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Simon Kitching wrote:
|
|I believe that maven.repo.apache.privatekey is not needed if your
|private key is in the default location ~/.ssh/id_dsa? And that the
|passphrase is not needed if your key has no passphrase (yes, keys
|should)?
Both correct
Author: brett
Date: Mon May 23 22:49:26 2005
New Revision: 178081
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=178081view=rev
Log:
adjust some properties, remove mixed line endings
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/commons-build/trunk/project.properties.sample
Modified:
On 5/24/05, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Phil,
On Tue, 2005-05-24 at 05:06 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-
-
##
-# Apache Central Repository
+# Deployment Repository Settings
+#
+# 'apache' is
59 matches
Mail list logo
