DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34661.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 21:17 -0700, Brian Stansberry wrote:
I've been testing my new implementation of
LogFactoryImpl and it's looking good except it fails
the testInContainer test of o.a.c.l.LoadTest. This
test sets up a parent-last (aka child-first)
classloader hierarchy that has JCL and a
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34661.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34661.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34661.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34661.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 11:34 -0400, Gary Gregory wrote:
Here is what I propose baring any -1s from others: I'll make the changes
noted below while still using the old test invocation style for the
Enum/Enums test. This last class loading problem being a weird one. Hm,
now that I think
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35112.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello,
I'm using commons-dbcp in my project running on a JDK 1.3. It requires
me to use the commons-dbcp library compiled with 'nojdbc3' option. I'm
also using maven to resolve dependencies. Commons-dbcp jar is available
from apache repository (sync with ibiblio), but this is the
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-email has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-email has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Hi,
This is in reference to the org.apache.commons.lang.SerializationUtils
class implementation written you. We are currently using this class to
serialize objects(graph) which are extremely heavy in size. I am looking
forward to optimize this serialization process. Following are few tips I
got
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35118.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-messenger has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-messenger has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-resources has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-resources has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
For me it looks good.
+1 !
Stefan
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Dear community,
after two extensive beta rounds and usage in both Jakarta Slide and
OJB it seems to be time for a final commons transaction 1.1 release.
As there were only very minor changes from the second beta a release
candidate
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-configuration-10 has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-configuration-10 has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35091.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: rdonkin
Date: Mon May 30 02:54:03 2005
New Revision: 179042
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=179042view=rev
Log:
Updated release document
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
URL:
hi deepak
you'll probably get a better response if you prefix your message with
[lang]. for more details on commons netiquette see
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/JakartaCommonsEtiquette.
- robert
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 14:07 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This is in reference
Hi,
This is in reference to the org.apache.commons.lang.SerializationUtils
class implementation written you. We are currently using this class to
serialize objects(graph) which are extremely heavy in size. I am looking
forward to optimize this serialization process. Following are few tips I
got
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Jakarta-commons Wiki
for change notification.
The following page has been changed by RobertBurrellDonkin:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/JakartaCommonsEtiquette
The comment on the change is:
Added section about
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35118.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35119.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35091.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35095.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 23:41 -0400, Dave Brondsema wrote:
It would be useful, I think, to get a keyid from a signature, fetch and
update keys from a keyserver, and get names and email addresses from a
public key.
Just verifying the signature without showing who's key created it (which
Author: oglueck
Date: Mon May 30 05:22:06 2005
New Revision: 179050
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=179050view=rev
Log:
doc
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/httpclient/cookie/IgnoreCookiesSpec.java
Modified:
Hello and have a good time of day!
I have recently discovered that Commons::Daemon 'parent' process
performs
shutdown in case of a fatal error (SIGSEGV, SIGABRT, etc) in the
'child' process
which runs the JVM. It seems to me that a better approach would be to
restart
a failed child (maybe
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35119.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
[I hope I haven't missed something but I could neither find a mailing
list dedicated to commons-digester nor an issue tracking system for
digester (tried bugzilla, scrab and jira).]
ObjectCreateRule uses the Digester's classloader for loading the class
of the object to be created. This may cause
Hello,
I'm using commons-dbcp in my project running on a JDK 1.3. It requires me to use the commons-dbcp library compiled with 'nojdbc3' option. I'm also using maven to resolve dependencies.
Commons-dbcp jar is available from apache repository (sync with ibiblio), but this is the JDK1.4/jdbc3
robert burrell donkin wrote:
Dave Brondsema wrote:
It would be useful, I think, to get a keyid from a signature, fetch and
update keys from a keyserver, and get names and email addresses from a
public key.
automatically fetching a public key from a server and then presenting
the name
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34661.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34661.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 23:41 -0400, Dave Brondsema wrote:
It would be useful, I think, to get a keyid from a signature, fetch and
update keys from a keyserver, and get names and email addresses from a
public key.
Just verifying the signature without showing who's
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 11:18 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
robert burrell donkin wrote:
Dave Brondsema wrote:
It would be useful, I think, to get a keyid from a signature, fetch and
update keys from a keyserver, and get names and email addresses from a
public key.
automatically
robert burrell donkin wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
You might want to involve Ben Laurie in this discussion.
that'd be great. what's the best way to organise this?
Well, cc'ing him as I've done would be one way to invite Ben to participate.
:-) And I'll add that I've already posted URLs to
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32579.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35126.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35118.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: rdonkin
Date: Mon May 30 12:05:57 2005
New Revision: 179134
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=179134view=rev
Log:
Fixed reference to CVS
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/trunk/xdocs/index.xml
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/trunk/xdocs/index.xml
URL:
Author: rdonkin
Date: Mon May 30 12:10:55 2005
New Revision: 179135
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=179135view=rev
Log:
Release branch for betwixt 0.6.1
Added:
jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/branches/RELEASE_0_6_1_BRANCH/
- copied from r179134,
Author: rdonkin
Date: Mon May 30 12:26:32 2005
New Revision: 179137
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=179137view=rev
Log:
Indicated that release is under preparation (for the website).
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/trunk/xdocs/index.xml
Modified:
Author: oheger
Date: Mon May 30 12:50:14 2005
New Revision: 179139
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=179139view=rev
Log:
Fix for issue 35118: XMLConfiguration now always checks its reloading strategy.
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35118.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 18:40 +1200, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 21:17 -0700, Brian Stansberry wrote:
I've been testing my new implementation of
LogFactoryImpl and it's looking good except it fails
the testInContainer test of o.a.c.l.LoadTest. This
test sets up a
Hi Michael,
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 15:48 +0200, Dr. Michael N. Lipp wrote:
[I hope I haven't missed something but I could neither find a mailing
list dedicated to commons-digester nor an issue tracking system for
digester (tried bugzilla, scrab and jira).]
Mailing list
Author: mbecke
Date: Mon May 30 18:09:19 2005
New Revision: 179178
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=179178view=rev
Log:
Ported TestHttpConnectionManager to HttpClientTestBase
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35118.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: ggregory
Date: Mon May 30 19:18:27 2005
New Revision: 179179
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=179179view=rev
Log:
Javadoc method ClassUtilsTest#newSystemClassLoader() while looking for Sun Java
1.3.1 build issues on Windows XP. See
Author: psteitz
Date: Mon May 30 20:04:20 2005
New Revision: 179181
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=179181view=rev
Log:
Added [math] prefix to Bugzilla templates.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/math/trunk/xdocs/developers.xml
Modified:
--- robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 18:40 +1200, Simon Kitching
wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 21:17 -0700, Brian
Stansberry wrote:
I've been testing my new implementation of
LogFactoryImpl and it's looking good except it
fails
the testInContainer
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 21:22 -0700, Brian Stansberry wrote:
I'm not sure if this is a flaw (maybe the child really
wanted jdk logging, and we're giving them log4j), but
basically we're discovering the log method made
available via the TCCL.
I think that if log4j *can* be used, and we find it,
PS:
Robert, you didn't reply on whether you agree with removing the
isXXXAvailable methods or not. Please see second paragraph of comment
#12, and Brian's response in comment#13:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34661
Brian: my comment re copy/paste error in comments for
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10825.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: skitching
Date: Mon May 30 22:14:24 2005
New Revision: 179191
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=179191view=rev
Log:
Fix file to validate against official schema; mostly a matter of
reordering xml elements.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/digester/trunk/project.xml
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34661.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34661.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35131.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35131.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
--- Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 21:22 -0700, Brian Stansberry
wrote:
I'm not sure if this is a flaw (maybe the child
really
wanted jdk logging, and we're giving them log4j),
but
basically we're discovering the log method made
available via the TCCL.
snip
--- Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian: my comment re copy/paste error in comments
for Lumberjack test
refer to this line:
// Other throwables just mean couldn't load the
adapter or j.u.l
in method discoverLogImplementation. I think the or
j.u.l shouldn't be
there?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34661.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 22:44 -0700, Brian Stansberry wrote:
Sorry, wasn't clear about what I meant. The test
classpath used in the ant build includes Log4j, so it
will be discovered (unless we create a special
classpath for this one test). In any case, whether or
not a particular adapter is
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 22:48 -0700, Brian Stansberry wrote:
snip
--- Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian: my comment re copy/paste error in comments
for Lumberjack test
refer to this line:
// Other throwables just mean couldn't load the
adapter or j.u.l
in method
71 matches
Mail list logo
