svn commit: r369712 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/LogFactory.java

2006-01-16 Thread skitching
Author: skitching Date: Mon Jan 16 23:56:00 2006 New Revision: 369712 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=369712&view=rev Log: Implement feature to load the commons-logging.properties file with the highest priority value, not just the first one found on the classpath. Modified: jakarta/c

svn commit: r369711 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/logging/PathableClassLoader.java

2006-01-16 Thread skitching
Author: skitching Date: Mon Jan 16 23:53:44 2006 New Revision: 369711 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=369711&view=rev Log: Provide facility to add URLs to the classpath. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/logging/PathableClassLoader.java Modifi

svn commit: r369709 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/logging/LoadTestCase.java

2006-01-16 Thread skitching
Author: skitching Date: Mon Jan 16 23:52:41 2006 New Revision: 369709 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=369709&view=rev Log: Remove unused imports Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/logging/LoadTestCase.java Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logg

RE: [all] Commons SCXML, beyond the first promotion vote

2006-01-16 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Rahul, Rahul Akolkar wrote on Tuesday, January 17, 2006 6:03 AM: > Based on Martin's (mvdb) veto against the recent promotion vote for > Commons SCXML, it is obvious that lack of Commons' developers' > interest (other than mine) for this component bothered some of us. As you also pointged out

svn commit: r369705 - /jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/logging/LogFactory.java

2006-01-16 Thread skitching
Author: skitching Date: Mon Jan 16 23:22:21 2006 New Revision: 369705 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=369705&view=rev Log: Simple code cleanup; classloader for LogFactory class is computed once at startup. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/log

svn commit: r369694 - /jakarta/commons/proper/jexl/trunk/project.xml

2006-01-16 Thread rahul
Author: rahul Date: Mon Jan 16 22:08:36 2006 New Revision: 369694 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=369694&view=rev Log: Adding myself to JEXL developers based on Dion's nod in the recent related thread on the commons-dev list. Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jexl/trunk/project.xml Mo

Re: [scxml] a few observations, issues before release

2006-01-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
The email exceeded the maximum length I myself am comfortable with when it comes to list emails, so I've spawned new threads for the two "technical" topics to keep message size manageable. But a couple of things are discussed here as well. On 1/14/06, Tim OBrien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm in

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Promote SCXML to Proper

2006-01-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 1/17/06, Tim OBrien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Add mine to the mix just for the record > > +0 at this time, I don't anticipate this not making it out of sandbox, but > I'd like to help solve > the only one committer issue before we promote. > Cool, feel free to add yourself to the project P

[SCXML] Decoupling Execution Context from the SCXML Model (WAS: [scxml] a few observations, issues before release)

2006-01-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 1/14/06, Tim OBrien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2. Decouple Execution Context from the SCXML Model > > Right now, the Context passed into the class that parses the XML and creates > the SCXML object is > the global execution context. You pass in a JexlContext when you are parsing > the SCXM

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Promote SCXML to Proper

2006-01-16 Thread Tim OBrien
Add mine to the mix just for the record +0 at this time, I don't anticipate this not making it out of sandbox, but I'd like to help solve the only one committer issue before we promote. ...and I just have some questions about committing to this public contract in a 1.0 release. --- Rahul Ak

[SCXML] SCXMLSerializer and package reorganization (WAS: [scxml] a few observations, issues before release)

2006-01-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 1/14/06, Tim OBrien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1. SCXMLSerializer > > Right now the code to serialize an SCXML object is a Visitor pattern that > constructs XML using a > series of StringBuffers. The code to read this XML document alrady uses a > straightforward set of > Digester rules and

[all] The ASF as a W3C member (WAS: [scxml] compliance with SCXML Working Draft)

2006-01-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 1/16/06, Tim OBrien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ...this brings up another issue, I think it would be beneficial for the ASF > to join the W3C, but > we're currently not a Member organization. FWIW, I'd like to see this happen as well. I believe Commons SCXML is an example where we're begi

[SCXML] Usecases (WAS: [VOTE] Promote SCXML to Proper)

2006-01-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 1/13/06, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > In the mean time, if you have browsed through Commons SCXML and have > > suggestions for improvement, let me know. Careful, that might risk > > making you a believer though ;-) > > I'll see if I can free up some time to dig into it,

[all] Commons SCXML, beyond the first promotion vote

2006-01-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
Based on Martin's (mvdb) veto against the recent promotion vote for Commons SCXML, it is obvious that lack of Commons' developers' interest (other than mine) for this component bothered some of us. In that light, Tim's interest towards an SCXML release indicated in his recent posts (pending his num

[RESULT][VOTE] Promote SCXML to Proper

2006-01-16 Thread Rahul Akolkar
There was a veto against this vote, and hence, this vote has failed. -1 mvdb (PMC, hence veto -- primary reason: lack of support from other Commons' developers) +1 rahul (Commons committer) No other votes. -Rahul On 1/12/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It is time for a promotio

svn commit: r369592 - in /jakarta/commons/sandbox/id/trunk/src: java/org/apache/commons/id/serial/ test/org/apache/commons/id/serial/ test/org/apache/commons/id/test/

2006-01-16 Thread joehni
Author: joehni Date: Mon Jan 16 14:31:20 2006 New Revision: 369592 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=369592&view=rev Log: Test serializability of TimeBasedAlphanumericIdentifierGenerator. Added: jakarta/commons/sandbox/id/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/id/test/ jakarta/commons/sa

Re: [id] Review before 1.0 (Summary)

2006-01-16 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Jörg Schaible wrote: The release plan is available now: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/id/1.0ReleasePlan > "Refactor PrefixXXXGeneratorIdentifier implementations" This should be done with great care. id generation is very performance and sync sensitive in many systems. > "Introduce a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38285] - [configuration] Add an option to save multiple values in one line

2006-01-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of "id/1.0ReleasePlan" by JörgSchaible

2006-01-16 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Jakarta-commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by JörgSchaible: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/id/1%2e0ReleasePlan The comment on the change is: Propose @since in javadoc --

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of "TheSandbox" by J örgSchaible

2006-01-16 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Jakarta-commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by JörgSchaible: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/TheSandbox The comment on the change is: Add commons-test

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38285] - [configuration] Add an option to save multiple values in one line

2006-01-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Trivial Update of "id/1.0Release Plan" by JörgSchaible

2006-01-16 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Jakarta-commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by JörgSchaible: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/id/1%2e0ReleasePlan ---

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of "id/1.0ReleasePlan" by JörgSchaible

2006-01-16 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Jakarta-commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by JörgSchaible: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/id/1%2e0ReleasePlan The comment on the change is: Check year of copyright

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38285] - [configuration] Add an option to save multiple values in one line

2006-01-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Cobertura and gump

2006-01-16 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Stefan, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Jörg Schaible > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> E.g c-math is also using cobertura and Gump does not complain, >> although I cannot find any trace for the dependency in Gump's >> metadata ... ?!? > > commons-math uses Ant in Gump, that's w

RE: [id] Review before 1.0 (Summary)

2006-01-16 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi fellows, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Phil Steitz wrote on Monday, January 16, 2006 1:27 AM: [snip] >> In any case, I think we have critical mass to get [id] promoted and >> released, and the API decisions left to make are fairly simple, so we >> should agree on a release plan and get the work do

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38117] - [configuration] XMLConfiguration contructor not loading the resource

2006-01-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of "id/1.0ReleasePlan" by JörgSchaible

2006-01-16 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Jakarta-commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by JörgSchaible: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/id/1%2e0ReleasePlan The comment on the change is: Summary of the release plan for c

Re: Cobertura and gump

2006-01-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > E.g c-math is also using cobertura and Gump does not complain, > although I cannot find any trace for the dependency in Gump's > metadata ... ?!? commons-math uses Ant in Gump, that's why you don't need the plugin. On the other hand

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of "Id" by JörgSchai ble

2006-01-16 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Jakarta-commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by JörgSchaible: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/Id The comment on the change is: Initial text for Commons-Id New page: ##language:

[Jakarta-commons Wiki] Update of "FrontPage" by Jö rgSchaible

2006-01-16 Thread Apache Wiki
Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Jakarta-commons Wiki" for change notification. The following page has been changed by JörgSchaible: http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-commons/FrontPage The comment on the change is: Add commons-id. --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38293] - [net] Cannot delete ftp server file using delteFile(pathtofile)

2006-01-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38288] - [codec] encode/decode fails for "�"

2006-01-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_

Re: Cobertura and gump

2006-01-16 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Brett, Brett Porter wrote: > Is cobertura really run by the other gump builds? Probably they don't > have a dependency on the plugin and you do. It is - and this is what I don't undestand. - Jörg http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta/commons/proper/math/trunk/project.xml?view=markup

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38293] New: - [net] Cannot delete ftp server file using delteFile(pathtofile)

2006-01-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Cobertura and gump

2006-01-16 Thread Brett Porter
Is cobertura really run by the other gump builds? Probably they don't have a dependency on the plugin and you do. - Brett Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi fellows, > > For c-id I've switched the coverage reports from clover to cobertura. > Unfortunately now gump is failing becasue of the dependency to

RE: [scxml] compliance with SCXML Working Draft

2006-01-16 Thread Tim OBrien
Good to hear that a stricter definition is on the way, I noticed that section 5.1 had constraints on attributes, but I didn't see any in 3.1. Let me ask you another question while I've got your attention, any plans to release an XML Schema for the SCXML standard? ...this brings up another issue

Re: [csv] feature and performance analysis

2006-01-16 Thread Stefan Rufer
Nice compilation! Just to let you know: I will try to reserve some Netcetera time to work on commons-csv. Unfortunately the project schedule looks "bad" for the next months, but let's see what we can do. cu Stefan On Sun, 15 Jan 2006, Henri Yandell wrote: From: Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTEC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38288] - [codec] encode/decode fails for "�"

2006-01-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38288] - [codec] encode/decode fails for "�"

2006-01-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_

[net] FTPS or...

2006-01-16 Thread Jose Juan Montiel
...why in org.apache.commons.net.ftp.FTP the variables BufferedReader _controlInput; BufferedWriter _controlOutput; aren't declare protected? Hi everybody, i'm newbee in this list, and i'm trying to impliments SSL-FTPS over Java 1.3.1, using http://sourceforge.net/projects/ufsc implementation of

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38288] New: - ecode/decode fails for "�"

2006-01-16 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_

RE: [scxml] compliance with SCXML Working Draft

2006-01-16 Thread Barnett, James
We hope to have a new working draft of the SCXML spec out soon (i.e. a week or two), which will tighten up the syntactic definition. The 'initialstate' attribute will be required. In general, for conformance issues, we will want to focus on the new draft, rather than the existing one. (But the

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-01-16 Thread commons-jelly-tags-define development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-01-16 Thread commons-jelly-tags-define development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-01-16 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jsl development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-01-16 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jsl development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-01-16 Thread commons-jelly-tags-html development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-01-16 Thread commons-jelly-tags-html development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-swing (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-01-16 Thread JellySwing development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-swing (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-01-16 Thread JellySwing development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-01-16 Thread commons-jelly-tags-xml development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-01-16 Thread commons-jelly-tags-xml development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-01-16 Thread commons-jelly development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-01-16 Thread commons-jelly development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-configuration (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2006-01-16 Thread dIon Gillard
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-configuration has an issue affecting its community integration. This issu

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-configuration (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2006-01-16 Thread dIon Gillard
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-configuration has an issue affecting its community integration. This issu

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-id (in module jakarta-commons-sandbox) failed

2006-01-16 Thread Adam Jack
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-id (in module jakarta-commons-sandbox) failed

2006-01-16 Thread Adam Jack
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-id has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1

Cobertura and gump

2006-01-16 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi fellows, For c-id I've switched the coverage reports from clover to cobertura. Unfortunately now gump is failing becasue of the dependency to the maven-cobertura-plugin. Since c-id is not the first project using cobertura I would like to know how this is managed in other projects? E.g c-math

RE: [id] Review before 1.0 (Summary)

2006-01-16 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Phil, Phil Steitz wrote on Monday, January 16, 2006 1:27 AM: [snip] I know quite some projects that use a snapshot of c-id to generate UUIDs in production (including some of mine). >>> >>> I don't know what we can do to make it more clear that people should >>> *not* depend on code

RE: [id] Review before 1.0 (Summary)

2006-01-16 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Phil, Phil Steitz wrote on Monday, January 16, 2006 1:31 AM: > On 1/15/06, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Phil Steitz wrote: >> >>> On 1/14/06, Michael Heuer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jörg Schaible wrote: > 8/ Prefix generators > > We have 3 generat