Author: bayard
Date: Sun Apr 30 23:37:14 2006
New Revision: 398536
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=398536view=rev
Log:
Archimedes Trajano offered another method for the class
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/text/CompositeFormat.java
Sandy McArthur wrote:
On 4/30/06, will pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) You often change method names based on the parameter types, e.g.
Archiver.addFile + Archiver.addFileName, setUnpackDestinationName +
setUnpackDestinationFile, etc. It seems more conventional and less
chaotic to give
On 4/30/06, C. Grobmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
here is a new draft for the compress interface:
* http://grobmeier.de/commons-compress-draft-5.zip
My fault for only just joining in etc, but why have the underlying
Tar/Zip classes
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39254.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38846.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38846.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38847.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38847.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 5/1/06, will pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sandy McArthur wrote:
On 4/30/06, will pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) You often change method names based on the parameter types, e.g.
Archiver.addFile + Archiver.addFileName, setUnpackDestinationName +
setUnpackDestinationFile, etc. It
I've been pondering if our critieria for granting committership is out of date.
It used to be, in Jakarta, that a committer was the basic element of
our culture. We didn't have members and we didn't particularly have a
PMC. Becoming a committer meant that you were a part of the fabric,
you
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38846.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 10:46 -0700, Henri Yandell wrote:
I've been pondering if our critieria for granting committership is out of
date.
i'm not sure that we really have any objective criteria: just a
subjective tradition :)
personally speaking, i will not nominate a new committer unless i am
I may be missing some requirements here, but it seems like in light of
the JavaBean bits we were talking about, that it makes sense to restrict
the properties on the actual interface, and have them correspond
directly to JavaBean properties. In addition, I would propose getting
rid of some
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39460.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39460.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 5/1/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 10:46 -0700, Henri Yandell wrote:
I've been pondering if our critieria for granting committership is out of
date.
i'm not sure that we really have any objective criteria: just a
subjective tradition :)
personally
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39460.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: dennisl
Date: Mon May 1 14:39:36 2006
New Revision: 398696
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=398696view=rev
Log:
Correct spelling.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/xdocs/guide.xml
jakarta/commons/proper/logging/trunk/xdocs/tech.xml
robert burrell donkin wrote:
after some investigation, the issue which turned up with RC8 was
determined not to be a bug. notes have been added to the troubleshooting
documentation.
RC10 is available from:
http://people.apache.org/~rdonkin/commons-logging. please download,
check and then
thanks :)
- robert
On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 21:39 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: dennisl
Date: Mon May 1 14:39:36 2006
New Revision: 398696
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=398696view=rev
Log:
Correct spelling.
Modified:
I'm not sure if there is some requirement I'm missing, but
1) It still seems strange to me that we have an interface that does two
things: pack an archive + unpack an archive, yet it has 16 methods on it.
Of these, 9 seem to be some variation of property getters/setters.
As far as I can
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39368.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39368.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39368.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32619.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: bayard
Date: Mon May 1 21:54:18 2006
New Revision: 398807
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=398807view=rev
Log:
Can't believe that Gary meant for the enums.EnumTest to import the
enum.ColorEnum class.
Modified:
Author: ggregory
Date: Mon May 1 21:56:12 2006
New Revision: 398808
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=398808view=rev
Log:
Fix Javadoc nits.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/time/FastDateFormat.java
Modified:
Author: ggregory
Date: Mon May 1 21:58:09 2006
New Revision: 398809
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=398809view=rev
Log:
Fix Javadoc nit: use the active voice.
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/lang/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/lang/time/DateFormatUtils.java
Modified:
Author: bayard
Date: Mon May 1 22:21:00 2006
New Revision: 398812
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=398812view=rev
Log:
Fixing the lack of ClassLoader consideration in the compareTo methods of
enum.Enum and enums.Enum, along with unit tests, as mentioned on Bugzilla entry
#32619 by Kathy
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32619.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: dion
Date: Mon May 1 22:26:34 2006
New Revision: 398813
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=398813view=rev
Log:
Checkstyle ignore
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/jexl/trunk/project.properties
Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/jexl/trunk/project.properties
URL:
Author: dion
Date: Mon May 1 22:39:36 2006
New Revision: 398816
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=398816view=rev
Log:
Checkstyle
Modified:
jakarta/commons/proper/jexl/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/jexl/parser/ASTAssignment.java
Modified:
38 matches
Mail list logo
