Re: Logging: SimpleLog not thread-safe

2006-10-15 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi Simon I like this solution. It's short, easy to understand and avoids binary incompatibility. -- Dennis Lundberg Simon Kitching wrote: After some thought, I've changed my mind about the solution. I think the best choice is instead to use a synchronized block: // Append date-time

[jira] Commented: (LANG-285) Wish : method unaccent

2006-10-15 Thread Aldrin Leal (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-285?page=comments#action_12442372 ] Aldrin Leal commented on LANG-285: -- A while ago, I did something on ISO8859-1, but methinks UTF-8 could handle it as well. Sorry about the comments being in

Re: Logging: SimpleLog not thread-safe

2006-10-15 Thread Mario Ivankovits
Hi Simon! I think the best choice is instead to use a synchronized block: This: (a) Avoids any binary-compatibility issues, as the member is still present and still used. Maybe you would like to deprecate the member too, so this can be cleaned up any time later.Though, its not that

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-10-15 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jsl development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

2006-10-15 Thread commons-jelly-tags-jsl development
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

RE: Logging: SimpleLog not thread-safe

2006-10-15 Thread James Carman
+1. I like it. -Original Message- From: Simon Kitching [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 11:12 PM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List Subject: Re: Logging: SimpleLog not thread-safe After some thought, I've changed my mind about the solution. I think the best

Three votes of PMC members required

2006-10-15 Thread Jochen Wiedmann
Hi, AFAIK the policy is still that three votes of PMC members are required. In other words, may I point you to http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11606631873 and ask kindly for positive votes? (Unless you have reason for negative votes, of course.) Jochen -- My wife Mary and I have been

[jira] Created: (EMAIL-59) SSL Support

2006-10-15 Thread Mitch McCuiston (JIRA)
SSL Support --- Key: EMAIL-59 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMAIL-59 Project: Commons Email Issue Type: New Feature Reporter: Mitch McCuiston Attachments: enable-ssl.patch Adding convenience methods

[jira] Updated: (EMAIL-59) SSL Support

2006-10-15 Thread Mitch McCuiston (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMAIL-59?page=all ] Mitch McCuiston updated EMAIL-59: - Attachment: enable-ssl.patch Here is a patch that's been working for me. SSL Support --- Key: EMAIL-59 URL:

[email] trunk build hangs during unit tests

2006-10-15 Thread Bjorn Townsend
Hello all, I'm trying to build commons-email from the source available via the SVN trunk, and while it compiles fine it seems to be hanging when it hits the unit tests: test:test: [junit] Running org.apache.commons.mail.DefaultAuthenticatorTest [junit] Tests run: 1, Failures: 0,

[betwixt] What's needed for a 0.8 release ?

2006-10-15 Thread Thomas Dudziak
Hi folks, as we're reading the 1.0 release of DdlUtils, Martin noticed that we currently use a SVN build of commons-betwixt. Since we very much would like to have a proper released betwixt version instead, I wanted to ask what needs to be done for a 0.8 release. I'd be happy to help getting

[jira] Commented: (SANDBOX-177) close stream when creating a signature

2006-10-15 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-177?page=comments#action_12442430 ] Antoine Levy-Lambert commented on SANDBOX-177: -- Patch is now committed. It looks like I do not have the karma to close the issue myself yet.

[jira] Commented: (SANDBOX-177) close stream when creating a signature

2006-10-15 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-177?page=comments#action_12442433 ] Antoine Levy-Lambert commented on SANDBOX-177: -- No, actually the commit did not work. close stream when creating a signature

[jira] Commented: (LANG-285) Wish : method unaccent

2006-10-15 Thread Gary Gregory (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-285?page=comments#action_12442447 ] Gary Gregory commented on LANG-285: --- There is a more Unicode way to do this as is outlined in this discussion:

[jira] Updated: (CONFIGURATION-230) XPathExpressionEngine nodeKey method create a wrong key for attribute node

2006-10-15 Thread Andy Yeung (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-230?page=all ] Andy Yeung updated CONFIGURATION-230: - Attachment: ConfigTest.java Here is the test case attached. and the console output is You can see that exception is thrown during reload and

Re: [jira] Old comment sent by email ... entries

2006-10-15 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 10/14/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/14/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone know what these are about? There was a mail sent to JIRA admins about this ... guess it might have needed wider distribution. For a fairly long period of time, replies to JIRA's

[jira] Updated: (CONFIGURATION-230) XPathExpressionEngine nodeKey method create a wrong key for attribute node

2006-10-15 Thread Andy Yeung (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-230?page=all ] Andy Yeung updated CONFIGURATION-230: - Attachment: ConfigTest.java Oh, I have modified the testcase so that the test didn't pass when the xml is not reloaded.

Re: [vfs][all] move vfs to maven 2 to setup a vfs-sandbox

2006-10-15 Thread Phil Steitz
On 10/13/06, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Torsten! ...so the real question is is it ok to have a proper component use maven2 ...right? hehe didn't I ask this? Yes, thats the real question! As a compromise I can maintain the maven 1 build for the core only (using the maven