[Validator] RegExpr

2006-06-19 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hey guys, is there any strong feeling from your side to switch the RegExpr. stuff to Java 1.4 ? Regards, matthias -- Matthias Wessendorf Aechterhoek 18 48282 Emsdetten blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Re: [patch?] feedparser (organizing imports)

2005-03-25 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi, I liked the remove unused import statements patch. How did you find this out? Did you use checkstyle or something? No. I used a feature from eclipse regarding that. I'm not sure about the generic import java.xxx.* removal. I prefer this style as it saves a LOT of time over worrying about w

Re: VOTE: feedparser 0.5.0 RC1

2005-03-22 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
I'm working on the "Needs a lot of jars issue" :) cool ;) I didn't get any -1s so I assume its a go. The big issue is that I just haven't had time to do the release... ok... next week I can help, if you want; (being Apache committer (matzew)) this week some other issue are on my plate! -Matthi

Re: VOTE: feedparser 0.5.0 RC1

2005-03-22 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Ok, is there any result on this issue? I played a bit with [feedparser] and it works for me ;) So "+1" for rc1 But needs lot of JARs... ;-( -Matthias Kevin A. Burton wrote: (Sent this out on Friday but it looks like it bounced... ) OK. I took the time tonight and made an FeedParser 0.5.0 RC1 availa

[Feedparser] NoClassDefFoundError

2005-03-20 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi, when I start the "HelloFeedParser" sample, I got: NoClassDefFoundError: org/saxpath/SAXPathException (see below) I loaded the *binary* from http://apache.org/~burton/ here is the SRC of my "HelloFeedParser": http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-commons-sandbox/feedparser/src/java/org/apach

[Feedparser] dependencies of JARs

2005-03-20 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi, I just saw on [1] that [feedparser] depends on lot's of JARs are all of them really needed to "run" applications, based upon [feedparser] ? Thanks, Matthias [1] http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/feedparser/dependencies.html ---

Re: VOTE: feedparser 0.5.0 RC1

2005-03-12 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Kevin, please do a chmod on the files: Forbidden You don't have permission to access /~burton/commons-feedparser-0.5-beta.tar.gz on this server. Apache/2.0.53 (Unix) Server at apache.org Port 80 :-) Kevin A. Burton wrote: OK. I took the time tonight and made an FeedParser 0.5.0 RC1 available fo

Re: [VOTE] [email] promote RC4 to 1.0 status

2005-03-12 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
-8<- [X] +1 Promote RC4 to commons-email-1.0 [ ] +0 In favour of this release [ ] -0 Against this release [ ] -1 Do not release RC4 Thanks Eric! Eric Pugh wrote: Hi all, A co

Re: [VOTE] Release commons email 1.0

2005-03-01 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
[X] +1 Lets release commons-email, it's been too long! [ ] 0 Commons-what? Not ready for release [ ] -1 Don't release. I can't get dumbster (replace with your reason) to work. Matthias thanks Eric! Eric Pugh - To unsubscribe,

Re: [Email] To release or not to release

2005-02-18 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
he dumbster.jar Regards, -Corey On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:05:40 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ok, thanks... build was done. before I now roll the release one question, I got this *test failure* does anyone know more about that? Thanks! Matthias test:te

[commons-el] new release?

2005-01-20 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi folks, on your project site the last release is from 2003. There are some changes in CVS that aren't reflected by the shipped JAR. eg. Logger replaced by [commons-logging] eg. Coercions' methods refactored... Do you plan to roll out a new release? That contains these changes? Thanks, Matthias

RE: [Email] To release or not to release

2005-01-20 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
\poms\commons -email-1.0.pom' BUILD SUCCESSFUL Total time: 1 minutes 13 seconds Finished at: Thu Jan 20 10:03:52 CET 2005 > -Original Message- > From: Joe Germuska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2005 2:58 PM > To: Matthias Wessendorf; 'Jakarta C

RE: [Email] To release or not to release

2005-01-18 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
g. Thanks! > -Original Message- > From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 4:20 PM > To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'; 'Dion Gillard' > Subject: RE: [Email] To release or not to release > > &g

RE: [Email] To release or not to release

2005-01-17 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
+1 > -Original Message- > From: Dion Gillard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, January 17, 2005 11:32 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; Corey Scott > Subject: Re: [Email] To release or not to release > > > I'm +1. > > > On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 17:12:20 +0800, Corey Scott

[solved] [GUMP@brutus]: Project commons-email (in module jakarta-commons) failed

2005-01-15 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi, I included a patch (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32889) now there are e.g two setTo() methods in Email.java: -setTo(java.util.Collection); -setTo(java.lang.String[]); So it bounces inside of EmailTest.java I first removed the patch. All is fine now... again... Btw. I wi

RE: [feedparser] problems

2005-01-13 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
I noticed some new activity on [feedparser]. But some problems I mentioned in this email are still existing. Any thoughts? Thanks! Matthias > -Original Message- > From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 5:45 PM > To:

[feedparser] problems

2004-12-08 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi all, I loaded [feedparser] and saw, that inside of package "org.apache.commons.feedparser.post" are clazzes with package-declaration "org.apache.commons.feedparser" see: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-commons-sandbox/feedparser/src /java/org/apache/commons/feedparser/post/MetaWeblog

[feedparser] nightly build

2004-12-06 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi all, is there a plan to [feedparser] (from sandbox) to nightly build? Best regards Mit freundlichen Grüßen -- Matthias Weßendorf Aechterhoek 18 DE-48282 Emsdetten Germany - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addi

RE: [VOTE][EMAIL] Release Commons-Email 1.0

2004-12-04 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
--- [X] +1 I support this release and am willing to help [ ] +0 I support this release but am unable to help [ ] -0 I do not support this release [ ] -1 I do not support this release, and here are my reasons ---

[email] kama

2004-11-28 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
could anyone add kama for [email] to my Apache account? (matzew) Btw. I am in jakarta-UNIX-Group on c.a.o However, I had had kama for [email] since it was in sandbox. I would like to apply patches, that the tests are runing on unix-systems. Thanks! Best regards Mit freundlichen Grüßen -- Matthi

[email] website

2004-11-27 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi all, the old [email]-site (http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/email/) has a nice layout. but the new has an ugly layout: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/email/ Best regards Mit freundlichen Grüßen -- Matthias Weßendorf Aechterhoek 18 DE-48282 Emsdetten Germany

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/email - Imported sources

2004-11-25 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
> Probably you are using Subversion and not CVS for Myfaces, so > it ran through cvs2svn which preserved history. no, we are using CVS. > cvs import doesn't preserve history. If you wanted to do > that, you'd have to move the *,v files of the server around > (which you did in the MyFaces case

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/email - Imported sources

2004-11-25 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Thursday, November 25, 2004 1:13 PM > To: Matthias Wessendorf > Cc: Commons-Dev > Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/email - Imported sources > > > Possibly.. I just followed the directions in the wiki. I > also didn't manage to import properly the /src/test t

RE: cvs commit: jakarta-commons/email - Imported sources

2004-11-25 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
cool! Eric, I just *surfed* cvs, we lost the cvs-log from sandbox, isn't it? -Matthias > -Original Message- > From: Eric Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 12:10 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; Mark Lowe > Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta-common

RE: [GUMP@brutus]: Project commons-email (in module jakarta-commons-sandbox) failed

2004-11-24 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Craig, > I haven't looked at the sources for the tests, but if you are > trying to start a dummy email server on a port < 1024, this > is guaranteed to fail (unless you are running as root) on any > Unix platform, which is definitely the case for the nightly > builds (Red Hat Linux 9.0). than

RE: [VOTE] Release Validator 1.1.4

2004-11-24 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
I used 1.1.4 inside of Apache MyFaces. works well! However, here is my +1 REgards, Matthias > -Original Message- > From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 10:10 AM > To: Commons Developers Jakarta > Subject: [VOTE] Release Validator 1.1.4 > >

[Email] nightly builds

2004-11-23 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi all, I just saw, that the nightly build of [email] is empty. Did I miss something? Regards, Matthias - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [VOTE] Promote Email to Commons Proper

2004-11-22 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
; > On 18 Nov 2004, at 11:39, Eric Pugh wrote: > > > > > > > Alright.. This thread has somewhat gotton away from me. Since > > > > Dumbster is > > > > now licensed as ASL (despite the website being out of > date), can > > > > we move to a

RE: [VOTE] Promote Email to Commons Proper

2004-11-18 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Henri, > +1 to promotion to Commons proper. > -1 to release until the dumbster site and release we are > dependent on is on a license we can use. > release is still ASL (see cvs): http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/dumbster/dumbster/src/com/dumbster /smtp/SimpleSmtpServer.java?rev=1.3&view=a

RE: [VOTE] Promote Email to Commons Proper

2004-11-16 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
romote Email to Commons Proper > > > I had a peek on SF, and it looks like the developer has changed the > license now: > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/dumbster/dumbster/license.txt?rev= 1.2&view=auto Cheers, Rory Matthias Wessendorf wrote: >yeah Mark, > >n

RE: [VOTE] Promote Email to Commons Proper

2004-11-16 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
yeah Mark, nice deal! I also just surfed to sf.net and figured out email-address of jasionkitchen ;-) so back to vote! ;-) -Matthias - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [VOTE] Promote Email to Commons Proper

2004-11-16 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Commons Proper > > > Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > your #1 should be the easiest way. > > Btw. do you know if the JAMES-folks > > have a facility like dumbster? > > Sorry, what is dumbster? > > -- > Serge Knystautas > Lokitech >> software .

RE: [VOTE] Promote Email to Commons Proper

2004-11-16 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
ah, now I read the rest, well doing such a component is a nice thing. since unit-tests for [email] are a plus. well I don't know how to promote such a component to sandbox, perhaps eric knows more? I guess must post some code, that you will push to Jakarta Commons Sandbox. After that, there will

RE: [VOTE] Promote Email to Commons Proper

2004-11-16 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Corey, yes you are right, main motivation is getting [email] out of sandbox :-) your #1 should be the easiest way. Btw. do you know if the JAMES-folks have a facility like dumbster? Regards, Matthias > -Original Message- > From: Corey Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, No

RE: [VOTE] Promote Email to Commons Proper

2004-11-15 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
+1 Email is indeed a nice *component*, that simplifies the JavaMail-Api. -Matthias > -Original Message- > From: Eric Pugh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 12:10 PM > To: Commons-Dev > Subject: [VOTE] Promote Email to Commons Proper > > > Email exhibits all o

RE: [email] Anyone interested?

2004-10-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
andbox projects are not allowed to have releases so you > would need to get voted into commons proper before releasing 1.0. > > David > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Tu

RE: [email] Anyone interested?

2004-10-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
e in commons-dev list, isn't it? Regards, Matthias > > -----Original Message- > > From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 3:44 PM > > To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'; 'Corey Scott' > > Sub

RE: [email] Anyone interested?

2004-10-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
my +1 too > -Original Message- > From: Corey Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 3:29 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [email] Anyone interested? > > > I think this is a great idea!! > -Corey > > > > Hi, > > These ideas are all very

RE: [email] Anyone interested?

2004-10-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
I guess Corey means only helper classes for [email] - A simple wrapper for validation - configured email-settings, that is in XML. for now, a developer needs to set all the stuff (eg. smtp-server, user,...) with a xml based *config* you could have more easy development. only setting s

RE: [email] Anyone interested?

2004-10-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Corey, are you thinking of introducing preconfigured email-objects as well? -Matthias > -Original Message- > From: Corey Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 10:27 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: [email] Anyone interested? > > > Is anyo

RE: [email] was RE: Validator inside of Email.java (RE: [email] Dumbster failing)

2004-10-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
alidator is a lot... yes! my +1 on remoing this dependency > Eric > > PS, please tag your emails with [email], many folks filter on > that type of tag in commons! sorry just forgotten... Matthias > > -Original Message- > > From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAI

RE: Validator inside of Email.java (RE: [email] Dumbster failing)

2004-10-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Want to say: A object represented by a clazz (subclass) of Email should be a valid Email. The validation should be done *before* creating an object of that class. -Matthias > -Original Message- > From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 2

Validator inside of Email.java (RE: [email] Dumbster failing)

2004-10-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi Eric, I just update my email sources. and looked abit on the patches you are submitting. Cool to have some unittest. Btw. I saw that EmailValidator of Commons Validator is used inside of Email.java; Does it realy make sence to validate an e-mail inside that class? shouldn't this work be done

RE: [email] Current status, etc.

2004-10-23 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Corey, I haven't looked at [Configuration] project. On my current project I have a solution like: -user's config is in xml I wrote a Configuratore, using Digester, and populating the properties of my UserConfig JavaBean. The JavaBean is used on setting up connection to a Server. Regards, Matthia

RE: [email] Current status, etc.

2004-10-23 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
> A project like [email] should not, IMHO, have its own > configuration code. That changes it from a low-level library > usable by all to one that forces a specific configuration > route. This is no good for frameworks like Spring where the > configuration mechanism is part of the framework. J

RE: [email] Current status, etc.

2004-10-23 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Hi Corey, I read your mail and saw that you contributed some unit tests. thanks. I am using email in a webapp for sending ecards. That works fine. I submitted two patches for this project, since I got kamar. One allows you do to pop3BeforeSmtp auth. (thanks to Daniel Perry) the other allows you to

RE: [Sandbox/Email] nightly builds

2004-08-30 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
> Great! Thanks for volunteering your time and machine! +1 -Matze - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Sandbox/Email] - Maven

2004-08-27 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
hi, when I try to run Maven, I got that: WARNING: Failed to download activation-1.0.2.jar. The build cannot continue because of the following unsatisfied dependencies: javamail-1.2.jar (try downloading from http://java.sun.com/products/javamail/) activation-1.0.2.jar (try downloading from http:/

RE: kama for commons/sandbox Email

2004-08-27 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
thanks guys! it was the "/home/cvs"-thing, thank James! Regards, Matthias > -Original Message- > From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 1:58 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: kama for commons/sandbox Email > > > James Mitche

RE: kama for commons/sandbox Email

2004-08-27 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
s/sandbox Email > > > On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 07:43:40 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Martin, > > > > the eclipse-project-properties for CVS tell me, > > that I used my apache-account for module > > "jakarta-commons

RE: kama for commons/sandbox Email

2004-08-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
ommons Developers List > Subject: Re: kama for commons/sandbox Email > > > Make sure you checked out the tree using your Apache account, > and that you're not trying to check in from a tree checked > out using anonymous CVS. > > -- > Martin Cooper > >

Commons-Email: (was Javamail license on geronimo-dev)

2004-07-14 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Does anyone know more on it? since Email uses java-mail from sun. regards, matthias -Original Message- From: Dain Sundstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 4:57 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Javamail license I know Geir has been working on this, but it p

RE: [validator] Why doesn't commons-validator include functional validators?

2004-05-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
that facade method sounds great, i use in JSF-Apps the "business logic" of some commons validators ;-) Cheers, > -Original Message- > From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, May 26, 2004 7:17 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [validator]

RE: [Validator] Niall Pemberton as Committer

2004-05-26 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
+1 > -Original Message- > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 10:16 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: [Validator] Niall Pemberton as Committer > > > Niall Pemberton is an Apache Struts Committer who would like > to apply some patche

RE: [Validator] Don Brown as Committer

2004-05-25 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
read Don's mail about commons-validator and his plans..., so here is my +1 Cheers, > -Original Message- > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 6:19 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: [Validator] Don Brown as Committer > > > Don Brow

RE: [math] Just a test

2004-05-24 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
jupp, noticed the same ... (today) > -Original Message- > From: Mark R. Diggory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 7:25 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: [math] Just a test > > > Unsure why my email is not coming through. > > -

[FileUpload] Utilclass for storing files in a specified directory

2004-05-24 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
I developed a class, that contains two methods, that store files to a specified dir. one methode takes only FormFile as argument, it loads that path for storing form a properties-file. the second takes FormFile and a String, which contains the desired path for storing, if not a properties-file i

RE: [validator] Why doesn't commons-validator include functional validators?

2004-05-21 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Don, (perhaps abit OT) do you know this article? http://weblogs.java.net/pub/wlg/618 and the JSR 94 (Java Rule Engine) http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=94 perhaps you will find something usefull. Cheers, Matze > -Original Message- > From: Don Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent

[Sandbox-Email] pop before smtp

2004-05-21 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
During disscussion with Daniel Perry, we both figured out, that there no Pop3BeforeSmtp-Support in Sandbox-Email Daniel wrotes a nice patch, that supports popBeforeSmtp. he send me his Email.java, that i am now also able to run this "feature" so would it be usefull to integrate the patch in email

RE: [Validator] 1.1.3 Release

2004-04-27 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
works fine with nightly builds from struts thanks! > -Original Message- > From: Robert Leland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 10:20 PM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [Validator] 1.1.3 Release > > > +1, Thanks > > If anyone would lik