Does this mean that I could simply remove gump.xml?
Quinton McCombs
NequalsOne - HealthCare marketing tools
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.NequalsOne.com
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
I was wondering at what point a component would be moved from the
sandbox into commons proper?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have been developing some unit tests for commons-mail. The problem is
that the only way that I have to test is to actually send an email and
inspect it manually. Has anyone else ever tested something like this
before without having to go through the manual inspection?
Thank you!
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:53 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: Karma to sandbox
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Quinton McCombs wrote:
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 13:29:58 -0600
I was hoping to get sufficient karma to commit to the sandbox. My
apache id is quintonm.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have completed the implementation of pool listeners. How should I
submit the patches?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there a commons coding style for commons or does it vary by
component?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The current cvs head does not compile. Is this something that someone
is working on?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, March 03, 2003 3:51 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [DBCP] cvs head does not compile
http://cvs.apache.org/builds/gump/latest/commons-dbcp.html
suggests this is OK. Can you be more specific?
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Quinton McCombs wrote:
The current cvs head does
I have completed the work on implementing pool listeners. I also
corrected a few small defects. Unit tests have been modified to
include testing using listeners as well. I am attaching a
compressed tar file.
Here are the changes:
StackObjectPool.borrowObject():
- Implement listener
I am working on a patch to allow listeners to be added to pools that
will receive notifications on various events. Does anyone object to
having this functionality included?
Here is the design -
I was thinking about adding support for a PoolListener interface for the
pool component. Object
implementing every method.
This way, it is easier to maintain backwards compatibility
in case of
new
listen events being introduced.
-Tim
Quinton McCombs wrote:
I am working on a patch to allow listeners to be added to
pools that
will receive notifications on various events
ignore the failure or to throw an
Exception.
I like the concept.
David
From: Quinton McCombs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [POOL] Pool listeners
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:19:48 -0600
I am working
).
3. The methods shouldn't throw Exception. They should throw
specific exception types or non at all.
I like the concept.
David
From: Quinton McCombs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
is the UK/European spelling.
Hen
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, Quinton McCombs wrote:
PoolAdapter?
-Original Message-
From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 2:01 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [POOL] Pool listeners
15 matches
Mail list logo
