Re: [AltRMI] multiplexing over single connection

2002-02-25 Thread vinaysahil chandran
Paul, So would the right place to export an Object from an API standpoint be : AltrmiFactory.exposeObject(Object o); ? Regards, Vinay --- Paul Hammant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vinay, Yes you are right BEEP looks better. There is a BSD impl on SF :-

Re: [AltRMI] multiplexing over single connection

2002-02-25 Thread Paul Hammant
Vinay, Paul, So would the right place to export an Object from an API standpoint be : AltrmiFactory.exposeObject(Object o); You mean in the context of BEEP and the layer it represents inside AltRMI ? I don't quite understand what you are asking here AltrmiFactory is a client-side class,

Re: [AltRMI] multiplexing over single connection

2002-02-25 Thread Paul Hammant
Vinay, Paul, I was aiming along the lines of UnicastRemoteObject.exportObject(Remote obj) . For the EventNotifier example I was trying to come with , the Subscriber exports itself and passes the reference of it to the Server. Subscriber: // SubscriberInterface.java public interface

Re: [AltRMI] multiplexing over single connection

2002-02-25 Thread vinaysahil chandran
Hey dude, you're scaring me with RMI interfaces! Sorry not my intention but somehow couldn't stop thinking of this example over Altrmi without much of an modification... Pub/Sub is just an fancy name for callbacks not so? Are we not talking about the same thing? We are ... Maybe I

Re: [AltRMI] multiplexing over single connection

2002-02-21 Thread Paul Hammant
Vinay, Yes you are right BEEP looks better. There is a BSD impl on SF :- http://sourceforge.net/projects/beepcore-java/ I don't think it is an issue for Request/Reply as it is a layer between AltrmiInvocationHandler and the true streaming mechanism... - Paul Hi, dghmux seems kewl, However