Re: [BeanUtils] PropertyUtils and DynaBeans (getPropertyDescriptors)

2002-04-18 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [BeanUtils] PropertyUtils and DynaBeans (getPropertyDescriptors) From: James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is what I was getting at. If DynaBeans were to become used as the main

Re: [BeanUtils] PropertyUtils and DynaBeans (getPropertyDescriptors)

2002-04-18 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Strachan wrote: Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 13:07:56 +0100 From: James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [BeanUtils] PropertyUtils and DynaBeans (getPropertyDescriptors

Re: [BeanUtils] PropertyUtils and DynaBeans (getPropertyDescriptors)

2002-04-18 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
: James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [BeanUtils] PropertyUtils and DynaBeans (getPropertyDescriptors) From: James Strachan [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [BeanUtils] PropertyUtils and DynaBeans (getPropertyDescriptors)

2002-04-16 Thread James Strachan
Message - From: Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 2:42 PM Subject: Re: [BeanUtils] PropertyUtils and DynaBeans (getPropertyDescriptors) What I am really getting at is whether it would be worth having

Re: [BeanUtils] PropertyUtils and DynaBeans (getPropertyDescriptors)

2002-04-13 Thread Stephen Colebourne
What I am really getting at is whether it would be worth having the ability in beanutils to replace Introspector. What I have in mind (borrowed from a James Strachan idea) is a new class, lets say IntrospectUtils that can be used instead of Introspector. The only method of relevance is

Re: [BeanUtils] PropertyUtils and DynaBeans (getPropertyDescriptors)

2002-04-12 Thread Arron Bates
Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [BeanUtils] PropertyUtils and DynaBeans (getPropertyDescriptors) [apologies - package name now inserted in subject] Folks, Is anyone working towards fixing PropertyUtils to work

Re: [BeanUtils] PropertyUtils and DynaBeans (getPropertyDescriptors)

2002-04-12 Thread Stephen Colebourne
] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [BeanUtils] PropertyUtils and DynaBeans (getPropertyDescriptors) [apologies - package name now inserted in subject] Folks, Is anyone working towards fixing PropertyUtils to work with DynaBeans (ie, where all the FIXME tags are)? What's the status (if any

Re: [BeanUtils] PropertyUtils and DynaBeans (getPropertyDescriptors)

2002-04-12 Thread Arron Bates
From what I understand, the property descriptor really handles the straight invocation of a bean property, not getting a hold of a collection and using it. For example, the IndexedPropertyDescriptor won't get back the Object[] and then get the object from the index, it only takes the Object

Re: [BeanUtils] PropertyUtils and DynaBeans (getPropertyDescriptors)

2002-04-11 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Fri, 12 Apr 2002, Matt Johnson wrote: Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 10:45:39 +1000 From: Matt Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [BeanUtils] PropertyUtils and DynaBeans (getPropertyDescriptors) [apologies