RE: Using Jira (was RE: [CLI] 2.x Tasks)

2003-11-17 Thread Brett Porter
t; To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: Using Jira (was RE: [CLI] 2.x Tasks) > > > > > On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Rob Oxspring wrote: > > > I'm happy to switch to jira as and when, although I've used > it before > > for reporting the grand total o

Re: Using Jira (was RE: [CLI] 2.x Tasks)

2003-11-17 Thread Henri Yandell
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003, Rob Oxspring wrote: > I'm happy to switch to jira as and when, although I've used it before > for reporting the grand total of 1 bug but I expect it'll be straight > forward. Anything's going to be a bit nicer than bugzilla! Just to throw in my tuppence, I've been using J

Re: [CLI] 2.x Tasks

2003-11-02 Thread John Keyes
Here's a toy example: -topleft -x 10 -y 10 -bottomright -x 20 -y 20 where the group is the x and y Arguments. Does that make any sense? Annoyingly, yes. :) So the problem is that when querying a CommandLine configured by the above we have no way of which -x and -y go with which -topleft and -

Re: [CLI] 2.x Tasks

2003-11-01 Thread John Keyes
Our current group support is limited to mutually exclusive groups. We need to support inclusive groups also. This will allow more than one option to have the same child options. Let me know if you have any thoughts on it. There's currently no problem with assigning the same group as children to

Re: [CLI] 2.x Tasks

2003-11-01 Thread Rob Oxspring
John Keyes wrote: Our current group support is limited to mutually exclusive groups. We need to support inclusive groups also. This will allow more than one option to have the same child options. Let me know if you have any thoughts on it. There's currently no problem with assigning the same gr

Re: Using Jira (was RE: [CLI] 2.x Tasks)

2003-11-01 Thread Rob Oxspring
John Keyes wrote: Now that we have jira on nagoya should we move to use this instead of Bugzilla? No biggy, but it is much a nicer interface than bugzilla. Not yet, please. We're still tuning the installation, and will certainly blow away the current database at least once more before declar

Re: [CLI] 2.x Tasks

2003-11-01 Thread John Keyes
Our current group support is limited to mutually exclusive groups. We need to support inclusive groups also. This will allow more than one option to have the same child options. Let me know if you have any thoughts on it. -John K On 1 Nov 2003, at 14:43, John Keyes wrote: . mandatory groups

Re: Using Jira (was RE: [CLI] 2.x Tasks)

2003-11-01 Thread John Keyes
Now that we have jira on nagoya should we move to use this instead of Bugzilla? No biggy, but it is much a nicer interface than bugzilla. Not yet, please. We're still tuning the installation, and will certainly blow away the current database at least once more before declaring it open. We'll p

Using Jira (was RE: [CLI] 2.x Tasks)

2003-11-01 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> Now that we have jira on nagoya should we move to use this instead of > Bugzilla? No biggy, but it is much a nicer interface than bugzilla. Not yet, please. We're still tuning the installation, and will certainly blow away the current database at least once more before declaring it open. We'll

Re: [CLI] 2.x Tasks

2003-11-01 Thread John Keyes
. mandatory groups I think this can be achieved using min/max with Groups but I might be missing the point. I'm not going to claim that this is well documented or intuitive though so ideas welcome. Doh! Of course. . child Options Parent instances can have a "children" Group - doesn't thi

Re: [CLI] 2.x Tasks

2003-10-31 Thread Rob Oxspring
- Original Message - From: "John Keyes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 11:40 PM Subject: Re: [CLI] 2.x Tasks > We definitely need to add these two tasks as well: >.

Re: [CLI] 2.x Tasks

2003-10-31 Thread John Keyes
List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 11:03 AM Subject: Re: [CLI] 2.x Tasks Great stuff Rob. Does this mean all remaining tasks can be found in Bugzilla? -John K - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [E

Re: [CLI] 2.x Tasks

2003-10-22 Thread John Keyes
> 1.3) Enum Argument Values > > Options should allow a list of possible values to validate against. > Currently this is in StringValidator but would EnumValidator be better name? > StringArrayValidator is also a suggested name. > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-commons-dev&m=102750803

Re: [CLI] 2.x Tasks

2003-10-22 Thread John Keyes
> Minor Enhancements > > 1.1) Posix option parsing should be default > > Posix parsing should be preferred. I.e. -buildfile should be parsed in the > following order of preference > > -b uildfile > -b -u -i -l -d -f -i -l -e. > -buildfile > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=j

Re: [CLI] 2.x Tasks

2003-10-22 Thread Rob Oxspring
- Original Message - From: "Rob Oxspring" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 3:19 PM Subject: [CLI] 2.x Tasks > I've been trawling through the mail archives and open b

[CLI] 2.x Tasks

2003-10-22 Thread Rob Oxspring
I've been trawling through the mail archives and open bugs to try and produce a comprehensive task list for CLI2. The list is broadly broken down into 6 sections and also contains a couple of items from my head. If we can weed out any nonsense and add any missing tasks I'll then go through and cr