> Rich, can you declare either:
>
> a) declare that the implementation was not copied
> b) supply a reimplementation if it was
>
> Otherwise I will be forced (legally) to remove the code from CVS (which
> I don't really want to do ;-), don't you just love licencing issues)
It looks like a lot of i
Rich, can you declare either:
a) declare that the implementation was not copied
b) supply a reimplementation if it was
Otherwise I will be forced (legally) to remove the code from CVS (which I don't really
want to do ;-), don't you just love licencing issues)
Stephen
> from:"Craig R. McCl
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, Rich Dougherty wrote:
> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 10:34:23 +1300 (NZDT)
> From: Rich Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Collections] NodeCachi
>> Also, I have some concerns about the code for
>> NodeCachingLinkedList. It looks like a lot of the code has been copied
>> from Sun's LinkedList implementation. If I understand correctly, this
>> makes the code unsuitable for inclusion in an Apache project.
>
> I didn't know about these sorts of
