To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help
understanding the request please visit
http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-io has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affect
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I've disabled the problematic code for now. We could increase the
> sleep time up to 2 seconds and it might work, but I don't think
> that's smart and it slows down the unit tests considerably. Ideas
> welcome.
Without looking into
I've disabled the problematic code for now. We could increase the sleep
time up to 2 seconds and it might work, but I don't think that's smart
and it slows down the unit tests considerably. Ideas welcome.
On 14.03.2004 19:32:02 Henri Yandell wrote:
>
> IO seems to pass the test sometimes and not
IO seems to pass the test sometimes and not pass others. I tried 3 times
and got only the one success. Both times it failed on
testCopyFile2WithoutFileDatePreservation, though it looks the same as the
other sleeper tests.
Hen
On 14 Mar 2004, Ted Husted wrote:
> To whom it may engage...
>
> This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For help
understanding the request please visit
http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-io has an issue affecting it's community integration. This issue
affe
