ey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 8:21 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Scamp: Source Control Abstraction
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 07:43 pm, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Steve Downey wrote:
> > Date: Tue,
TED]> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Proposal] Scamp: Source
> > Control Abstraction
> >
> > On Tuesday 17 September 2002 06:15 pm, Daniel Rall wrote:
> > > In what ways does this differ from DAV?
> >
> >
On Tue, 17 Sep 2002, Steve Downey wrote:
> Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 19:13:59 -0400
> From: Steve Downey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re:
On Tuesday 17 September 2002 06:15 pm, Daniel Rall wrote:
> In what ways does this differ from DAV?
A SCM system can sit on top of DAV, or DAV + deltaV. Subversion, for example,
is using deltaV as the communication protocol between its client and server.
But DAV, in and of itself, isn't a generic
That's a really good thought, I'm adding it to the interface list
-Original Message-
From: Charles Burdick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 3:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Scamp: Source Control Abstraction
This is indeed a
ation needs. I guess I need a sense of what the
community thinks the short vs. long term direction should be.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Lenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 4:28 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Scamp: S
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Downey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 3:07 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [Proposal] Scamp: Source Control Abstraction
>
>
> I think it's a great idea. There'
Hi Lance,
I think this JSR is quite related to your proposal:
http://www.webdav.org/deltav/wvcm/
Albeit inspired by WebDAV/DeltaV, I believe it is supposed to be
generic. Also, AFAIK, it is initiated by an Eclipse team member, so its
implementation is heading open-source.
Weber, Lance wro
This is indeed a great idea.
An associated deliverable I'd love to see is a set of XML DTDs for
describing log entries, etc.
If the API could output to a standard XML format, then each app could
avoid parsing all the text output of each SCM tool.
--- Weber, Lance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Foll
+1. Great idea.
James
---
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
- Original Message -
From: "Jason van Zyl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Proposal] S
On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 13:53, Weber, Lance wrote:
> Following some interesting discussions on the Maven list, I'd like to
> propose starting an SCM abstraction project, tentatively named Scamp.
>
> Proposed Goal:
> Scamp is a Source Control Manager abstraction layer. It provides a standard
> inte
Have you taken a look at how Eclipse handles this?
http://eclipse.org
***
Richard A. Sitze
IBM WebSphere WebServices Development
Following some interesting discussions on the Maven list, I'd like to
propose starting an SCM abstraction project, tentative
Following some interesting discussions on the Maven list, I'd like to
propose starting an SCM abstraction project, tentatively named Scamp.
Proposed Goal:
Scamp is a Source Control Manager abstraction layer. It provides a standard
interface to SCM systems allowing common source control operation
13 matches
Mail list logo
