Since I'm resending and copying the PMC, I'm also changing Hen's VOTE
from a +0 to a +1 as he has indicated on commons-dev.
This VOTE has passed, [scxml] has been promoted to proper.
Summary: 7 binding +1s, no -1s (see details for +/-0s).
Details:
+1:
Robert Burrell Donkin
Phil Steitz
Dion Gi
On 4/17/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This VOTE has passed, [scxml] has been promoted to proper.
>
> Summary: 6 binding +1s, no -1s (see details for +/-0s).
>
> Details:
>
> +1:
> Robert Burrell Donkin
> Phil Steitz
> Dion Gillard
> Jörg Schaible (non-binding)
> Niall Pemberton
> C
This VOTE has passed, [scxml] has been promoted to proper.
Summary: 6 binding +1s, no -1s (see details for +/-0s).
Details:
+1:
Robert Burrell Donkin
Phil Steitz
Dion Gillard
Jörg Schaible (non-binding)
Niall Pemberton
Craig McClanahan
Martin van den Bemt
+0:
Henri Yandell
-0:
Stephen Colebour
On 1/17/06, Tim OBrien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Add mine to the mix just for the record
>
> +0 at this time, I don't anticipate this not making it out of sandbox, but
> I'd like to help solve
> the only one committer issue before we promote.
>
Cool, feel free to add yourself to the project P
Add mine to the mix just for the record
+0 at this time, I don't anticipate this not making it out of sandbox, but I'd
like to help solve
the only one committer issue before we promote.
...and I just have some questions about committing to this public contract in
a 1.0 release.
--- Rahul Ak
There was a veto against this vote, and hence, this vote has failed.
-1 mvdb (PMC, hence veto -- primary reason: lack of support from
other Commons' developers)
+1 rahul (Commons committer)
No other votes.
-Rahul
On 1/12/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is time for a promotio
