RE: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Commons Codec 1.2-rc1

2003-11-25 Thread Gary Gregory
OTE][RESULT] Release Commons Codec 1.2-rc1 > > Alright, a better distribution is published, signed, md5'd. > RELEASE-NOTES had a few typos, and was missing some items. A small > detail, but important nonetheless. > > > > Tim O'Brien wrote: > > > That v

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Commons Codec 1.2-rc1

2003-11-24 Thread Tim O'Brien
Alright, a better distribution is published, signed, md5'd. RELEASE-NOTES had a few typos, and was missing some items. A small detail, but important nonetheless. Tim O'Brien wrote: That version of Codec 1.2 I pushed to www.apache.org/dist seems to be alright except for the fact that I bundle

RE: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Commons Codec 1.2-rc1

2003-11-23 Thread Gary Gregory
fixes will see the light of day at some point. Gary > -Original Message- > From: Tim O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 20:07 > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Commons Codec 1.2-rc1 >

RE: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Commons Codec 1.2-rc1

2003-11-21 Thread Gary Gregory
Ok, thanks Tim. Gary > -Original Message- > From: Tim O'Brien [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 20:07 > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Commons Codec 1.2-rc1 > > Alright Gary, thanks for pu