Henri Yandell wrote:
> Wow, lots of failing tests. Thanks Jörg.
>
> If only we had as many JDKs being tested on the nightly builds.
>
> Any chance you could get these in JIRA? I agree with you that they
> shouldn't hold up the build [and the Konqueror bit is something to add
> under the Commons
Wow, lots of failing tests. Thanks Jörg.
If only we had as many JDKs being tested on the nightly builds.
Any chance you could get these in JIRA? I agree with you that they
shouldn't hold up the build [and the Konqueror bit is something to add
under the Commons All JIRA project].
[In the meantim
Hi Hen,
Henri Yandell wrote:
> On 2/8/07, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> It seems that we cannot format correctly also if the JDK fails. :-/
>
> Ack :(
>
> What kind of environment are you in? timezone/platform/jdk version/locale?
CET/Gentoo Linux/Sun JDK 1.5.0_10/de_DE
On 2/9/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What kind of environment are you in? timezone/platform/jdk version/locale?
Same here
GMT+1/Windows XP/1.4.2_13 and 1.5.0_09/sv_SE
I'll back the unit test out (well comment it out). The issue isn't
resolved in JIRA yet, but no reason to h
Henri Yandell wrote:
On 2/8/07, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Hen,
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Here's the 2nd release candidate for Lang 2.3:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang/commons-lang-2.3-rc2/
>
> Clirr, Jardiff + Site included.
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1
>
> Vote to clo
On 2/8/07, Jörg Schaible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Hen,
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Here's the 2nd release candidate for Lang 2.3:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang/commons-lang-2.3-rc2/
>
> Clirr, Jardiff + Site included.
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1
>
> Vote to close on Saturday if it g
Hi Hen,
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Here's the 2nd release candidate for Lang 2.3:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang/commons-lang-2.3-rc2/
>
> Clirr, Jardiff + Site included.
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] -1
>
> Vote to close on Saturday if it gets that far.
DateFormatUtils.testLang312 still f
Lack of license/notice is a -1.
*grumble at self* thought Lang had that already.
*whines...are we ready for maven2 yet?*
Hen
On 2/7/07, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Its at the RMs discretion as to whether he wants a new RC.
James Carman wrote:
> Is that a -1?
>
> On 2/7/07,
Its at the RMs discretion as to whether he wants a new RC.
James Carman wrote:
Is that a -1?
On 2/7/07, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Missing LICENSE and NOTICE in -sources.jar and -javadoc.jar.
Missing pom.xml in src bundle.
Stephen
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Here's the 2nd re
Is that a -1?
On 2/7/07, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Missing LICENSE and NOTICE in -sources.jar and -javadoc.jar.
Missing pom.xml in src bundle.
Stephen
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Here's the 2nd release candidate for Lang 2.3:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang/c
Missing LICENSE and NOTICE in -sources.jar and -javadoc.jar.
Missing pom.xml in src bundle.
Stephen
Henri Yandell wrote:
Here's the 2nd release candidate for Lang 2.3:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang/commons-lang-2.3-rc2/
Clirr, Jardiff + Site included.
[ ] +1
[ ] -1
Vote to
Not intended, but probably not a blocker.
Hen
On 2/7/07, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1, looks good to me.
Only thing I noticed is that the maven 2 pom is not contained in the
source distribution. Is this intended?
Oliver
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Here's the 2nd release candidate fo
+1, looks good to me.
Only thing I noticed is that the maven 2 pom is not contained in the
source distribution. Is this intended?
Oliver
Henri Yandell wrote:
Here's the 2nd release candidate for Lang 2.3:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang/commons-lang-2.3-rc2/
Clirr, Jardiff +
Here's the 2nd release candidate for Lang 2.3:
http://people.apache.org/~bayard/commons-lang/commons-lang-2.3-rc2/
Clirr, Jardiff + Site included.
[ ] +1
[ ] -1
Vote to close on Saturday if it gets that far.
Hen
-
To unsubs
14 matches
Mail list logo
