that vote wasn't binding - see rondey's comments in
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=jakarta-commons-dev&m=104411028226767
this thread is an official VOTE (for the archives).
- robert
On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 07:31 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
I have a "deja-vu" sentiment, I remember we
I have a "deja-vu" sentiment, I remember we already voted on this.
But +1 again.
Costin
Jan Luehe wrote:
> Please cast your vote on the promotion of the commons-el package from
> "commons sandbox" to "commons proper".
>
> The commons-el package contains the EL evaluator code from JSP 2.0.
> Se
robert burrell donkin wrote:
> the following concerns me about the proposal:
>
> (4) Initial Committers
> The initial committers will be identical to those of the Standard Taglib
> project.
>
> i'm unhappy with this since it implies that all current taglib committers
> will be grandfathered in.
+1
From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Jan Luehe wrote:
>
> > Robert,
> >
> > > (4) Initial Committers
> > > The initial committers will be identical to those of the Standard
Taglib
> > > project.
> > >
> > > i'm unhappy with this since it implies that all current tagli
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Jan Luehe wrote:
> Robert,
>
> > (4) Initial Committers
> > The initial committers will be identical to those of the Standard Taglib
> > project.
> >
> > i'm unhappy with this since it implies that all current taglib committers
> > will be grandfathered in. a list of the peop
i'm now satisfied :)
+1
- robert
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 06:42 PM, Jan Luehe wrote:
Robert,
(4) Initial Committers
The initial committers will be identical to those of the Standard Taglib
project.
i'm unhappy with this since it implies that all current taglib committers
will be gran
Robert,
> (4) Initial Committers
> The initial committers will be identical to those of the Standard Taglib
> project.
>
> i'm unhappy with this since it implies that all current taglib committers
> will be grandfathered in. a list of the people being proposed would be
> much better.
OK, I've
the following concerns me about the proposal:
(4) Initial Committers
The initial committers will be identical to those of the Standard Taglib
project.
i'm unhappy with this since it implies that all current taglib committers
will be grandfathered in. a list of the people being proposed would be
