-- --
[X] +1 Release Commons FileUpload 1.1-RC2 as Commons FileUpload 1.1
[ ] +0 not too fussed, but OK
[ ] -0 won't block, but think imperfect
[ ] -1 not until xxx is fixed
The only co
On Wed, 2005-12-21 at 09:09 -0800, Martin Cooper wrote:
> On 12/21/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > hi martin
> >
> > does fileupload required 1.4 JDK or higher?
>
>
> From project.properties:
>
> maven.compile.source=1.3
> maven.compile.target=1.3
just checking si
On 12/21/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> hi martin
>
> does fileupload required 1.4 JDK or higher?
>From project.properties:
maven.compile.source=1.3
maven.compile.target=1.3
--
Martin Cooper
(probably the minimum JDK is probably something we should start adding
> to
hi martin
does fileupload required 1.4 JDK or higher?
(probably the minimum JDK is probably something we should start adding
to the release notes.)
- robert
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 22:54 -0800, Martin Cooper wrote:
> While the vote on Release Candidate 1 passed, I have taken the time to clean
> u
+1..
Mvgr,
Martin
Martin Cooper wrote:
While the vote on Release Candidate 1 passed, I have taken the time to clean
up all of the minor issues reported against that candidate build, and to
modify the jar manifest to adhere to recently discussed Commons conventions.
This vote, therefore, is on
While the vote on Release Candidate 1 passed, I have taken the time to clean
up all of the minor issues reported against that candidate build, and to
modify the jar manifest to adhere to recently discussed Commons conventions.
This vote, therefore, is on whether or not the FileUpload 1.1-RC2 build
On 12/11/05, Phil Steitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1 Looks good.
>
> One nit, which is not worth -0 IMHO, but which you might consider.
> Both bin and src distros unpack to the same directory. Some people
> prefer the src distro to unpack to -src.
I did consider this, and swithered about
On 12/11/05, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> I would, however, like to see the deprecations issued in IO 1.1
> removed from the fileupload 1.1 sources. A (minor) patch to that
> effect is available for consideration in bugzilla, item 37865 [1].
Thanks. Fixed.
--
Martin Cooper
+1
I would, however, like to see the deprecations issued in IO 1.1
removed from the fileupload 1.1 sources. A (minor) patch to that
effect is available for consideration in bugzilla, item 37865 [1].
-Rahul
[1] http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37865
On 12/11/05, Martin Cooper <
+1 Looks good.
One nit, which is not worth -0 IMHO, but which you might consider.
Both bin and src distros unpack to the same directory. Some people
prefer the src distro to unpack to -src. This could be accomplished
by adding
to the end of your postGoal on dist:prepare-src-filesyst
On 12/10/05, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1 from me - I have the following minor comments:
>
> 1) On the "Issue Tracking" page the "Submit a Bug" link puts an "[io]"
> prefix in the header rather than "[fileupload]".
Fixed.
2) The links on the "Changes/Developer Activity/File
+0
cheers
--
Torsten
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
+1
Don Brown wrote:
+0
On 12/10/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A new release of Commons FileUpload is long overdue, to say the least, and
I
believe it's ready. The remaining issues are either enhancements or
pending
further input. The distributions for FileUpload 1.1 Release
+0
On 12/10/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A new release of Commons FileUpload is long overdue, to say the least, and
> I
> believe it's ready. The remaining issues are either enhancements or
> pending
> further input. The distributions for FileUpload 1.1 Release Candidate 1
> ar
Niall Pemberton wrote:
3) I upgraded the Struts 1.2.8 example webapp with no problems, except
I initially forgot to add the new Commons IO dependency - IMO it would
be worth mentioning this in the official announcement if/when the 1.1
release is approved.
And this is why I will give it a -0. My o
+1..
There are just too many fixes since 2003 to NOT release :)
Mvgr,
Martin
Martin Cooper wrote:
A new release of Commons FileUpload is long overdue, to say the least, and I
believe it's ready. The remaining issues are either enhancements or pending
further input. The distributions for FileUpl
+1 from me - I have the following minor comments:
1) On the "Issue Tracking" page the "Submit a Bug" link puts an "[io]"
prefix in the header rather than "[fileupload]".
2) The links on the "Changes/Developer Activity/File Activity" report
don't work - this is a bug in the maven plug-in - but cha
A new release of Commons FileUpload is long overdue, to say the least, and I
believe it's ready. The remaining issues are either enhancements or pending
further input. The distributions for FileUpload 1.1 Release Candidate 1 are
now available here:
http://people.apache.org/~martinc/fileupload/v1.1
18 matches
Mail list logo
