This vote has closed, a new one based on RC3 has been initiated.
-Rahul
On 3/10/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a vote for the release [io] v1.2
>
> RC2 is here:
> http://people.apache.org/~scolebourne/commons-io/
>
> Site here:
> http://people.apache.org/~scolebourne
On 3/11/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-03-11 at 14:49 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> > robert burrell donkin wrote:
>
> > > 3 the raw jar will need to be signed and summed before it's made
> > > available through the apache java repository.
> > I don't think
On 3/10/06, Gary Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the link. How about a link from:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~scolebourne/commons-io/site/building.html
>
> To:
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/building.html
If we follow Stephen's proposal (which I think has merit), this is
m
TECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 5:18 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release IO 1.2
>
> On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 22:50 -0500, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Hello:
>
> hi gary
>
> > > [X] -1 I do not support this release because...
On Sat, 2006-03-11 at 14:49 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > 2 AFAICT only the java docs (and not the maven documentation) is shipped
> > with the binary distribution. is this intentional?
> The dist is performed using ant to ensure correct JDK building. The an
On Sat, 2006-03-11 at 14:49 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > 3 the raw jar will need to be signed and summed before it's made
> > available through the apache java repository.
> I don't think we are signing yet. A sum will be needed
all new jars must be signed
robert burrell donkin wrote:
1 having the jar in the source distribution seems a little odd. i'd be
interested in the reasons behind this decision.
The jar is the primary goal of downloading, and we all know that
compiliing the jar under the right JDK and build conditions can be
difficult. All
+1
No problems with tests under linux.
One note: The binary distributions created by maven usually contain the
htmls for the whole site in their doc subdirectory, not just the API
docs.Would this be worth a thought?
Oliver
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> This is a vote for the release [io] v1.2
>
+1..
With a note : I like to see a cleanup of issues. Where there is a request for eg a testcase, maybe
just close the issue and if issues (most of the enhancements) could be applicable for this release,
some note on why not added to the current release.
This can be done after the release, but
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 22:50 -0500, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hello:
hi gary
> > [X] -1 I do not support this release because...
>
> The Maven build will fail [1] if you do not have commons-build
> installed.
this flaw has been present in every release made mavenization.
could i ask you to please
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 22:33 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> This is a vote for the release [io] v1.2
>
> RC2 is here:
> http://people.apache.org/~scolebourne/commons-io/
>
> Site here:
> http://people.apache.org/~scolebourne/commons-io/site/
>
> Release notes here:
> http://people.apache.org/
5 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release IO 1.2
>
> On 3/10/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm sorry but I don't think this is a good enough reason for a -1
vote.
> If
> > it is, then its placing
ine.. 26
> Column 69
> C:\temp\commons-build\xdocs\style not found.
> Total time: 4 minutes 38 seconds
> Finished at: Fri Mar 10 18:37:45 PST 2006
>
> C:\temp\commons-io-1.2-RC2-src
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
:45 PST 2006
C:\temp\commons-io-1.2-RC2-src
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 2:33 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: [VOTE] Release IO 1.2
>
> This is a vote for the release [io] v1.2
I guess you already saw, but I tried to document more thoroughly the results
of running IO tests using W2K in bugzilla:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38927
Other than that the release looks good. From what I can see only question
mark against IO actual code (rather than test c
nds
Finished at: Fri Mar 10 18:37:45 PST 2006
C:\temp\commons-io-1.2-RC2-src
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 2:33 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: [VOTE] Release IO 1.2
>
> This i
eCVSAware(FileFil
> terTestCase.java:415)
> at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
>
> Niall
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Stephen Colebourne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List&qu
al Message -
From: "Stephen Colebourne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List"
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 10:33 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release IO 1.2
> This is a vote for the release [io] v1.2
>
> RC2 is here:
> http://people.apache.or
+0
On 3/10/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a vote for the release [io] v1.2
>
> RC2 is here:
> http://people.apache.org/~scolebourne/commons-io/
>
> Site here:
> http://people.apache.org/~scolebourne/commons-io/site/
>
> Release notes here:
> http://people.apache.org/~s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1 (non-binding)
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
> This is a vote for the release [io] v1.2
>
> RC2 is here:
> http://people.apache.org/~scolebourne/commons-io/
>
> Site here:
> http://people.apache.org/~scolebourne/commons-io/site/
>
> Release notes her
This is a vote for the release [io] v1.2
RC2 is here:
http://people.apache.org/~scolebourne/commons-io/
Site here:
http://people.apache.org/~scolebourne/commons-io/site/
Release notes here:
http://people.apache.org/~scolebourne/commons-io/site/upgradeto1_2.html
[ ] +1 I support t
21 matches
Mail list logo
