[RESULT][VOTE] Validator 1.3.1 Release

2006-12-01 Thread Niall Pemberton
The validator 1.3.1 release received eight +1 votes (all binding) and no other votes: Craig McClanahan Rahul Akolkar Oliver Heger Henri Yandell Stephen Colebourne Jörg Schaible Rory Winston Niall Pemberton Thanks to everyone for taking the time to check out and vote on th

Re: [VOTE] Validator 1.3.1 Release

2006-12-01 Thread Rory Winston
I meant to say, of course, +1 :-) Henri Yandell wrote: +1. pgp good, md5 good, jar in the binary same as the jar for maven, jar created from src has no jardiff with the jar for maven [not sure what else I can really check to compare], and manifest looks good. Hen On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton

Re: [VOTE] Validator 1.3.1 Release

2006-12-01 Thread Rory Winston
+! Henri Yandell wrote: +1. pgp good, md5 good, jar in the binary same as the jar for maven, jar created from src has no jardiff with the jar for maven [not sure what else I can really check to compare], and manifest looks good. Hen On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I h

RE: [VOTE] Validator 1.3.1 Release

2006-11-30 Thread Jörg Schaible
A little late, but nevertheless +1 Niall Pemberton wrote on Tuesday, November 28, 2006 6:49 PM: > This is a vote for the release of Validator 1.3.1 > > RC1 is here: > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/validator-1.3.1-rc1/ > > Site here: > http://people.apache.org/~niallp/validator-1.3.1-rc1/site

Re: [VOTE] Validator 1.3.1 Release

2006-11-29 Thread Stephen Colebourne
+1 Brief check looked good. Stephen Niall Pemberton wrote: This is a vote for the release of Validator 1.3.1 RC1 is here: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/validator-1.3.1-rc1/ Site here: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/validator-1.3.1-rc1/site/ Release notes here: http://people.apache.org/~n

Re: [VOTE] Validator 1.3.1 Release

2006-11-28 Thread Henri Yandell
+1. pgp good, md5 good, jar in the binary same as the jar for maven, jar created from src has no jardiff with the jar for maven [not sure what else I can really check to compare], and manifest looks good. Hen On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have uploaded a new version

Re: [VOTE] Validator 1.3.1 Release

2006-11-28 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have uploaded a new version of validator - which are the proposed final artifacts for the 1.3.1 release if the vote passes - available here: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/validator-1.3.1/ http://people.apache.org/~niallp/validator-

Re: [VOTE] Validator 1.3.1 Release

2006-11-28 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 11/28/06, Henri Yandell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/28/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Follow up comment on something I missed (and will apply to Ra

Re: [VOTE] Validator 1.3.1 Release

2006-11-28 Thread Henri Yandell
On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/28/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Follow up comment on something I missed (and will apply to Rahul's digester > > release candidate as well). Are you pl

Re: [VOTE] Validator 1.3.1 Release

2006-11-28 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have uploaded a new version of validator - which are the proposed final artifacts for the 1.3.1 release if the vote passes - available here: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/validator-1.3.1/ http://people.apache.org/~niallp/validator

Re: [VOTE] Validator 1.3.1 Release

2006-11-28 Thread Niall Pemberton
I have uploaded a new version of validator - which are the proposed final artifacts for the 1.3.1 release if the vote passes - available here: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/validator-1.3.1/ http://people.apache.org/~niallp/validator-1.3.1/site/ Following comments from Rahul and Oliver it ha

Re: [VOTE] Validator 1.3.1 Release

2006-11-28 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 11/28/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/28/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 11/28/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Validator 1.3.1 Release

2006-11-28 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/28/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/28/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

Re: [VOTE] Validator 1.3.1 Release

2006-11-28 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/28/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * We should mark digester (and beanutils) as optional BeanUtils is requried - its not just there for Digester, its used internally in Validator. For digester perhaps, although sin

Re: [VOTE] Validator 1.3.1 Release

2006-11-28 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/28/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/28/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > [X] +1 I support this release > > >

Re: [VOTE] Validator 1.3.1 Release

2006-11-28 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 11/28/06, Oliver Heger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1, looks good to me. One remark: The manifest in the jar states that a JDK 1.5 was used to build the release. How do you guarantee that the jar is really compatible with earlier JDK versions (I mean that no APIs are used that were introduced

Re: [VOTE] Validator 1.3.1 Release

2006-11-28 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 11/28/06, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is a vote for the release of Validator 1.3.1 > > > [X] +1 I support this release > [ ] +0 > [ ] -0 > [ ] -1 I do not support this release because... >

Re: [VOTE] Validator 1.3.1 Release

2006-11-28 Thread Niall Pemberton
On 11/28/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/28/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > [X] +1 I support this release > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -0 > > [ ] -1 I do not support this release because

Re: [VOTE] Validator 1.3.1 Release

2006-11-28 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 11/28/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > [X] +1 I support this release > [ ] +0 > [ ] -0 > [ ] -1 I do not support this release because... > Inspected the artifacts, they all look good

Re: [VOTE] Validator 1.3.1 Release

2006-11-28 Thread Oliver Heger
+1, looks good to me. One remark: The manifest in the jar states that a JDK 1.5 was used to build the release. How do you guarantee that the jar is really compatible with earlier JDK versions (I mean that no APIs are used that were introduced in later JDKs)? Oliver Niall Pemberton wrote: T

Re: [VOTE] Validator 1.3.1 Release

2006-11-28 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is a vote for the release of Validator 1.3.1 [X] +1 I support this release [ ] +0 [ ] -0 [ ] -1 I do not support this release because... Couple of comments: * We should recommend digester 1.7 over 1.6

Re: [VOTE] Validator 1.3.1 Release

2006-11-28 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 11/28/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [X] +1 I support this release [ ] +0 [ ] -0 [ ] -1 I do not support this release because... Inspected the artifacts, they all look good. Also passes the Shale Validator unit tests with 1.3.1-RC1, once I adde

[VOTE] Validator 1.3.1 Release

2006-11-28 Thread Niall Pemberton
This is a vote for the release of Validator 1.3.1 RC1 is here: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/validator-1.3.1-rc1/ Site here: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/validator-1.3.1-rc1/site/ Release notes here: http://people.apache.org/~niallp/validator-1.3.1-rc1/site/changes-report.html -