Gump 'bot (pretending to be Ted Husted) wrote:
[snip]
Project commons-jjar has an issue affecting it's community integration. The current state is 'Failed', for reason 'Build Failed'
[snip]
BUILD FAILED
/data3/gump/jakarta-commons-sandbox/jjar/build.xml:173: Warning: Could not find file
My fault, I thought it was the other way around for Commons.
Hen
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004, Michael Davey wrote:
Gump 'bot (pretending to be Ted Husted) wrote:
[snip]
Project commons-jjar has an issue affecting it's community integration. The current
state is 'Failed', for reason 'Build
It doesn't matter to Gump which you chose, the main thing is that if the
Gump descriptor for a project references a license filename, and that
filename is missing, it'll complain.
That has caught us on few LICENSE - LICENSE.txt changes recently.
regards
Adam
- Original Message -
From:
I thought that the idea was that the prefered name is without an
extension:
quote href=http://apache.org/dev/apply-license.html;
*Can the LICENSE and NOTICE files be called LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt?*
This is permitted. However the preference is that the files be called
LICENSE and
