Re: [all] Website enhancements [was Release Validator 1.2.0]

2005-11-20 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 11/20/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 22:39 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > > > I'm not forcing anybody into anything :-), but I think these do provide > > benefits to our users if we can share them across more commons > > components. I would like

Re: [all] Website enhancements [was Release Validator 1.2.0]

2005-11-20 Thread robert burrell donkin
On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 22:39 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote: looks good :) > I'm not forcing anybody into anything :-), but I think these do provide > benefits to our users if we can share them across more commons > components. I would like us to try and agree on one naming convention > for

Re: [all] Website enhancements [was Release Validator 1.2.0]

2005-11-14 Thread Brett Porter
Dion Gillard wrote: On 11/15/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Feel free to submit improvements to the original Maven templates as well. I think Dion just volunteered to commit them, right? :) Me, commit on Maven? I'm not a committer. I thought you still had commit on maven-1. My

Re: [all] Website enhancements [was Release Validator 1.2.0]

2005-11-14 Thread Dion Gillard
On 11/15/05, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Feel free to submit improvements to the original Maven templates as > well. I think Dion just volunteered to commit them, right? :) Me, commit on Maven? I'm not a committer. > I think someone had on their queue to backport the Maven 2.0 vers

Re: [all] Website enhancements [was Release Validator 1.2.0]

2005-11-14 Thread Brett Porter
Feel free to submit improvements to the original Maven templates as well. I think Dion just volunteered to commit them, right? :) I think someone had on their queue to backport the Maven 2.0 versions: http://maven.apache.org/source-repository.html http://maven.apache.org/issue-tracking.html http

Re: [all] Website enhancements [was Release Validator 1.2.0]

2005-11-14 Thread Stephen Colebourne
Dion Gillard wrote: Do these reports in Maven provide a way of specifying a custom template? That would be preferable, since the maven default sucks. All I did was create xdocs .xml files with the correct name. Maven then uses those. Feel free to copy from [io], or perhaps [validator] since

Re: [all] Website enhancements [was Release Validator 1.2.0]

2005-11-14 Thread Dion Gillard
Do these reports in Maven provide a way of specifying a custom template? That would be preferable, since the maven default sucks. On 11/15/05, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I spent some of the weekend fine tuning some improvements to the maven > documentation. I'd like to propos

Re: [all] Website enhancements [was Release Validator 1.2.0]

2005-11-14 Thread Niall Pemberton
e.g. "[beanutils]" ) to the subject line. http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/beanutils/issue-tracking.html Niall - Original Message - From: "Stephen Colebourne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 10:39

[all] Website enhancements [was Release Validator 1.2.0]

2005-11-14 Thread Stephen Colebourne
I spent some of the weekend fine tuning some improvements to the maven documentation. I'd like to propose that other components consider the same ideas. 1) Improving cvs-usage: Maven default: http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/digester/cvs-usage.html Improved version: http://jakarta.apache.org/c