Re: [all] why junit 3.7 instead of 3.8.1?

2003-10-18 Thread __matthewHawthorne
1. And if users only have 3.7 then we don't require them to get another jar. Stephen - Original Message - From: "__matthewHawthorne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 6:40 PM Sub

Re: [all] why junit 3.7 instead of 3.8.1?

2003-10-18 Thread Stephen Colebourne
elopers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 6:40 PM Subject: [all] why junit 3.7 instead of 3.8.1? > The subject pretty much says it all... why do the majority of commons > projects depend on junit 3.7 instead of 3.8.1? > > > -

RE: [all] why junit 3.7 instead of 3.8.1?

2003-10-17 Thread Shapira, Yoav
-Original Message- >From: __matthewHawthorne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 1:41 PM >To: Jakarta Commons Developers List >Subject: [all] why junit 3.7 instead of 3.8.1? > >The subject pretty much says it all... why do the majority of commons >proje

[all] why junit 3.7 instead of 3.8.1?

2003-10-17 Thread __matthewHawthorne
The subject pretty much says it all... why do the majority of commons projects depend on junit 3.7 instead of 3.8.1? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]