1. And if users only have 3.7 then we don't require them to get another
jar.
Stephen
- Original Message -
From: "__matthewHawthorne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 6:40 PM
Sub
elopers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 6:40 PM
Subject: [all] why junit 3.7 instead of 3.8.1?
> The subject pretty much says it all... why do the majority of commons
> projects depend on junit 3.7 instead of 3.8.1?
>
>
> -
-Original Message-
>From: __matthewHawthorne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 1:41 PM
>To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
>Subject: [all] why junit 3.7 instead of 3.8.1?
>
>The subject pretty much says it all... why do the majority of commons
>proje
The subject pretty much says it all... why do the majority of commons
projects depend on junit 3.7 instead of 3.8.1?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]