behaviour like a bean.
>
> (i'm not a dynabeans expert so hopefully i'll be corrected if i've gone
> wrong.)
>
> - robert
>
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Stephen Colebourne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "Jakarta Comm
27;m not a dynabeans expert so hopefully i'll be corrected if i've gone
wrong.)
- robert
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Colebourne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002
t; used as some kind of workaround for "not map enabled"
frameworks ?
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Colebourne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jakarta Commons Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 9:50 PM
Subject: R
From: "robert burrell donkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> a map could act as a pseudo-bean by having each key-value pair act as a
> pseudo-property. the name of the property corresponds to the key (from the
> pair) and the property value corresponds to the value (from the pair).
FYI, this is part of wha
On Monday, November 25, 2002, at 11:25 PM, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
AFAIK, we've never promised that the BeanUtils or PropertyUtils code
formally support Maps as the *destination* of a property set operation,
even though they are acceptable as the source in certain scenarios. In
addition, if
