Re: [clazz] New project? [was Re: [lang] Proposal for *NEXT* version]

On Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 01:23:09PM -0700, Dmitri Plotnikov wrote: > Stephen, > > What was the resolution on this issue? In case you need more votes, > here's mine: > > +1 > > How far along are you? Do you need any help? I am very much iterested > in the outcome and could do a bunch of coding/t

Re: [clazz] New project?

Great, I'm just tidying up what I have at the moment (not vast amounts). It includes some code from Ola berg too. I like the idea of getting together a bit more of a detailed proposal first. We just need to ensure that we come back to the mailing list before too long, so as not to exclude anybody

Re: [clazz] New project?

Stephen, I actually have some time I could dedicate to [clazz] right now. Would you like to do this: you send me your source code. I look at that and write up a draft design proposal (English and/or JavaDoc). I am intimately familiar with introspection in the JDK, [jxpath], [betwixt], [digester]

Re: [clazz] New project?

Its basically about hours in the day primarily. The Apache/Commons reorg discussion has taken up far too much valuable time. Plus I am trying to get a release of my Joda projects date and time code out. Anyway: - so far the name seems to be [clazz] - the proposal (attached) seemed to be accepted -

Re: [clazz] New project? [was Re: [lang] Proposal for *NEXT* version]

Stephen, What was the resolution on this issue? In case you need more votes, here's mine: +1 How far along are you? Do you need any help? I am very much iterested in the outcome and could do a bunch of coding/testing for you. JXPath currently has its own introspection mechanism and I am eage

RE: [clazz] New project? [was Re: [lang] Proposal for *NEXT*vers ion]

> -Original Message- > From: Stephen Colebourne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 12:40 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [clazz] New project? [was Re: [lang] Proposal for *NEXT* > version] > > > From: "B

Re: [clazz] New project? [was Re: [lang] Proposal for *NEXT* version]

m:Juozas Baliuka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 11:45:37 > > to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > subject: Re: [clazz] New project? [was Re: [lang] Proposal for *NEXT* version] > > > > it seems both of them are trade marks: > >

Re: [clazz] New project? [was Re: [lang] Proposal for *NEXT* version]

From: "Berin Loritsch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Not sure about the name, but I like the concept. Maybe we can call it "Klass" > (sounds the same)? Any particular reason for not liking clazz??. Its not that important, I guess klass would be fine. ;-) Stephen -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [clazz] New project? [was Re: [lang] Proposal for *NEXT* version]

Stephen Colebourne wrote: > There seems to be some consensus that a new project is possible here. I have > already been working locally on classes in this area. Below is the > proposal.html file that I was using to control my scope:? > > (0) Rationale > > The Java Reflection Framework provides a

Re: [clazz] New project? [was Re: [lang] Proposal for *NEXT* version]

+1 I will help to code low level stuff. I think we need some high level API (interfaces ?) first and we will find ways how to implement it later BCEL, java.lang.reflect ... .. > There seems to be some consensus that a new project is possible here. I have > already been working locally on classe

[clazz] New project? [was Re: [lang] Proposal for *NEXT* version]

There seems to be some consensus that a new project is possible here. I have already been working locally on classes in this area. Below is the proposal.html file that I was using to control my scope:? (0) Rationale The Java Reflection Framework provides a set of classes for accessing and callin