Greene')
> GO
>
> Here is the result set:
>
> - ----- ---
> G650 G650 4
>
> (1 row(s) affected)
>
> - - ---
> B432 G650 0
>
> (1 row(s) affected)
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Inger, Matt
ject: RE: [codec] Soundex / Refined Soundex
Any thoughts on the "difference" method?
-Original Message-
From: Gary Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 12:18 PM
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'
Subject: RE: [codec] Soundex /
Any thoughts on the "difference" method?
-Original Message-
From: Gary Gregory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 12:18 PM
To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'
Subject: RE: [codec] Soundex / Refined Soundex
Hello,
Thank you for you
e("testing") returns "T6036084"
Gary
> -Original Message-
> From: Inger, Matthew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 09:08
> To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'
> Subject: [codec] Soundex / Refined Soundex
>
> Can an
Can anyone tell me the difference between these two soundex
implementations? Also, is there any planned support for a
difference algorithm for soundex (similar to the one provided
by SQLServer?)
We are looking for a soundex implementation to use in our
software. Thanks in advance for your help.
