On Thursday 14 April 2005 11:42, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Ok I see your point. There was a support for default values in
> PropertiesConfiguration some time ago but we removed it in favor of
> CompositeConfiguration. For consistency I think we will apply the same
> reasoning for INIConfiguration, th
On Thursday 14 April 2005 11:32, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> > Many application ini files have some kind of default-section.
> > Consider the following ini-file:
>
> [snip]
>
> well, such a behaviour would be different from all other configuration
> implemnetations and I don't think it is worth the hass
Oliver Siegmar wrote:
Many application ini files have some kind of default-section. Consider the
following ini-file:
[default]
foo = 30
val = 50
[section1]
foo = 10
Ok I see your point. There was a support for default values in
Pr
Oliver Siegmar wrote on Thursday, April 14, 2005 11:12 AM:
> On Thursday 14 April 2005 10:55, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Oliver Siegmar wrote:
>>> Does your implementation has default (a.k.a. global, a.k.a. common)
>>> section support?
>>
>> What do you mean by default section exactly ? Currently m
On Thursday 14 April 2005 10:55, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Oliver Siegmar wrote:
> > Does your implementation has default (a.k.a. global, a.k.a. common)
> > section support?
>
> What do you mean by default section exactly ? Currently my
> implementation does the following:
Many application ini files
Oliver Siegmar wrote:
Does your implementation has default (a.k.a. global, a.k.a. common) section
support?
What do you mean by default section exactly ? Currently my
implementation does the following:
- config.addProperty("foo.bar.xyz", "123") creates a [foo] section with
a bar.xyz property:
Hi Emmanuel,
On Thursday 14 April 2005 09:51, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi Oliver, thank you for offering your help. I already started working
> on this. I didn't want to commit it until 1.1 was released, I'll add it
> to SVN as soon as I fix a few remaining issues.
Does your implementation has def
Hi Oliver, thank you for offering your help. I already started working
on this. I didn't want to commit it until 1.1 was released, I'll add it
to SVN as soon as I fix a few remaining issues.
Emmanuel Bourg
Oliver Siegmar wrote:
Hi,
does someone work on the IniFile support? If not, I could do...
Oliver Siegmar wrote on Thursday, April 14, 2005 8:39 AM:
> Hi,
>
> does someone work on the IniFile support? If not, I could do...
You might utilize http://www.ubique.ch/code/inieditor/. Lib comes with BSD
style license and is very small and easy. You should use only the ctors with
the stream
Hi,
does someone work on the IniFile support? If not, I could do...
...just drop me a line.
Cheers,
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10 matches
Mail list logo