[email] dumbster *nix

2004-11-04 Thread Mark Lowe
I've started a new thread as I think it will be more useful as a separate dialogue. I've just tried Corey's unix test (and added the patched jar), and have the same problems. Only very quickly so could be something that i've overlooked. What i cant work out is how the dumbster tests passed when i

RE: [email] dumbster *nix

2004-11-04 Thread Eric Pugh
/mailserver/gettingstarted.html [3] http://james.apache.org/ -Original Message- From: Mark Lowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 11:14 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; Corey Scott; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [email] dumbster *nix I've started a new thread

Re: [email] dumbster *nix

2004-11-04 Thread Mark Lowe
/gettingstarted.html [3] http://james.apache.org/ -Original Message- From: Mark Lowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2004 11:14 AM To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; Corey Scott; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [email] dumbster *nix I've started a new thread as I

Re: [email] dumbster *nix

2004-11-04 Thread Mark Lowe
Developers List; Corey Scott; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [email] dumbster *nix I've started a new thread as I think it will be more useful as a separate dialogue. I've just tried Corey's unix test (and added the patched jar), and have the same problems. Only very quickly so

Re: [email] dumbster *nix

2004-11-04 Thread Corey Scott
In addition to this (and to post to this list, what we have been discussion privately). I have added a method to the dumbster which takes a server socket as an input instead of a port number. The advantage of this is that you can create the server socket using: ServerSocket newSocket = new