thout automation
(or lots of attention to detail!).
Thanks for the assist..
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Corey Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2004 8:05 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [email] rm -
We appreciate all the help we can get :-)
-Corey
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 11:35:04 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 11:14:28 +0100, Eric Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > But, it's not really a big deal. It's only a problem for the nightly build
> > based
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 11:14:28 +0100, Eric Pugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But, it's not really a big deal. It's only a problem for the nightly build
> based on Ant, and as long as Gump is happy (which it should be as they are
> installed as packages) then it doesn't bother me.
If the Ant script
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 9:47 PM
> > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > Subject: [email] rm -r lib/*.jar
> >
> >
> > Apologies for treading on people's toes here, but I wanted to get the
> > problem solved quic
nstalled as packages) then it doesn't bother me.
Eric
> -Original Message-
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 9:47 PM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: [email] rm -r lib/*.jar
>
>
> Apologies for tr
Apologies for treading on people's toes here, but I wanted to get the
problem solved quickly, even if it causes a bad build etc. Making sure
we're good licence-wise is crucial.
Craig raised the issue on the PMC list that the email component had
the activation.jar and the javamail.jar in the cvs re
